Sustaining effective research/operational collaborations: Lessons learned from a National Partnered Evaluation Initiative

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Nicholas W. Bowersox , Veronica Williams , Linda Kawentel , Amy M. Kilbourne
{"title":"Sustaining effective research/operational collaborations: Lessons learned from a National Partnered Evaluation Initiative","authors":"Nicholas W. Bowersox ,&nbsp;Veronica Williams ,&nbsp;Linda Kawentel ,&nbsp;Amy M. Kilbourne","doi":"10.1016/j.hjdsi.2021.100588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Effective research-operational partnerships require that researchers ask questions targeting top clinical operational priorities. However, disconnects exist between healthcare researchers and operational leadership that result in significant delays between discovery and implementation of breakthroughs in healthcare.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Using the Veterans Health Administration Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI) Partnered Evaluation Initiative (PEI) as a case study, we identified relationship characteristics of collaborative research projects designed to address the research/operations gap.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>An interview guide was developed focusing on areas identified as essential for effective research/operational partnerships from previous research. Investigators (N = 14) and their operational leadership partners (N = 14) representing 16 PEIs were interviewed by phone related to the characteristics of their partnerships. All investigators had had advanced degrees in fields related to healthcare delivery and administration and were affiliated with VHA research institutes. All operational partners served in national leadership roles within VHA operational offices. Detailed interview notes collected from interviews were coded and themes identified using thematic analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Eight relationship themes were identified: leadership support, shared understanding, investment, trust, agreement on products, mutual benefit, adaptability, and collaboration. Most operational and investigator partners discussed the importance of leadership support, shared understanding, investment, trust and product agreement, suggesting that these may be more essential than other areas in supporting effective operations/research collaborations. One theme (mutual benefit) was mentioned by most investigators but only some operations partners, pointing to potential differences related to this area between the two groups. Facilitators of effective collaboration included obtaining formal leadership support, developing a shared understanding of partner priorities and needs, ongoing discussions about resource needs, expanding collaborations beyond the initial project, having a clearly defined plan, planning for flexibility, plans for regular communication, and active participation in project meetings.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Partnership characteristics that facilitate effective collaboration include leadership support, shared understanding of planned work, investment, trust, and product agreement. Future research should assess the overall impact of partnered approaches to healthcare improvement within other large healthcare systems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":29963,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare-The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation","volume":"9 4","pages":"Article 100588"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare-The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213076421000713","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Introduction

Effective research-operational partnerships require that researchers ask questions targeting top clinical operational priorities. However, disconnects exist between healthcare researchers and operational leadership that result in significant delays between discovery and implementation of breakthroughs in healthcare.

Objective

Using the Veterans Health Administration Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI) Partnered Evaluation Initiative (PEI) as a case study, we identified relationship characteristics of collaborative research projects designed to address the research/operations gap.

Methods

An interview guide was developed focusing on areas identified as essential for effective research/operational partnerships from previous research. Investigators (N = 14) and their operational leadership partners (N = 14) representing 16 PEIs were interviewed by phone related to the characteristics of their partnerships. All investigators had had advanced degrees in fields related to healthcare delivery and administration and were affiliated with VHA research institutes. All operational partners served in national leadership roles within VHA operational offices. Detailed interview notes collected from interviews were coded and themes identified using thematic analysis.

Results

Eight relationship themes were identified: leadership support, shared understanding, investment, trust, agreement on products, mutual benefit, adaptability, and collaboration. Most operational and investigator partners discussed the importance of leadership support, shared understanding, investment, trust and product agreement, suggesting that these may be more essential than other areas in supporting effective operations/research collaborations. One theme (mutual benefit) was mentioned by most investigators but only some operations partners, pointing to potential differences related to this area between the two groups. Facilitators of effective collaboration included obtaining formal leadership support, developing a shared understanding of partner priorities and needs, ongoing discussions about resource needs, expanding collaborations beyond the initial project, having a clearly defined plan, planning for flexibility, plans for regular communication, and active participation in project meetings.

Conclusions

Partnership characteristics that facilitate effective collaboration include leadership support, shared understanding of planned work, investment, trust, and product agreement. Future research should assess the overall impact of partnered approaches to healthcare improvement within other large healthcare systems.

维持有效的研究/业务合作:从国家伙伴评价倡议中吸取的经验教训
有效的研究-业务伙伴关系要求研究人员提出针对最高临床业务优先事项的问题。然而,医疗保健研究人员和运营领导之间存在脱节,导致医疗保健突破的发现和实施之间存在重大延迟。目的:以退伍军人健康管理局质量提升研究计划(QUERI)合作评估计划(PEI)为例,探讨旨在解决研究/运营差距的合作研究项目的关系特征。方法制定了一份访谈指南,重点关注从以前的研究中确定的有效研究/业务伙伴关系至关重要的领域。通过电话对代表16个pei的调查人员(N = 14)及其业务领导伙伴(N = 14)进行了与其合作伙伴关系特征相关的访谈。所有调查人员都拥有与医疗服务和管理相关领域的高级学位,并隶属于VHA研究机构。所有业务合作伙伴都在VHA业务办事处担任国家领导职务。从访谈中收集的详细访谈笔记被编码,并使用主题分析确定主题。结果确定了8个关系主题:领导支持、共同理解、投资、信任、产品协议、互利、适应性和协作。大多数业务和研究者合作伙伴讨论了领导支持、共同理解、投资、信任和产品协议的重要性,表明这些可能比其他领域更重要,以支持有效的业务/研究合作。大多数调查人员提到了一个主题(互惠互利),但只有一些业务合作伙伴提到了这一主题,这表明两组之间在这一领域存在潜在差异。有效协作的促进因素包括获得正式的领导支持,对合作伙伴的优先级和需求形成共同的理解,对资源需求进行持续的讨论,在初始项目之外扩展合作,有一个明确定义的计划,为灵活性制定计划,为定期沟通制定计划,并积极参与项目会议。促进有效协作的伙伴关系特征包括领导支持、对计划工作的共同理解、投资、信任和产品协议。未来的研究应评估合作方法对其他大型医疗保健系统内医疗保健改善的总体影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: HealthCare: The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation is a quarterly journal. The journal promotes cutting edge research on innovation in healthcare delivery, including improvements in systems, processes, management, and applied information technology. The journal welcomes submissions of original research articles, case studies capturing "policy to practice" or "implementation of best practices", commentaries, and critical reviews of relevant novel programs and products. The scope of the journal includes topics directly related to delivering healthcare, such as: ● Care redesign ● Applied health IT ● Payment innovation ● Managerial innovation ● Quality improvement (QI) research ● New training and education models ● Comparative delivery innovation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信