Eran Diamant, Amram Torgeman, Eyal Epstein, Adva Mechaly, Alon Ben David, Lilach Levin, Arieh Schwartz, Eyal Dor, Meni Girshengorn, Ada Barnea, Ohad Mazor, Ran Zichel
{"title":"A cell-based alternative to the mouse potency assay for pharmaceutical type E botulinum antitoxins.","authors":"Eran Diamant, Amram Torgeman, Eyal Epstein, Adva Mechaly, Alon Ben David, Lilach Levin, Arieh Schwartz, Eyal Dor, Meni Girshengorn, Ada Barnea, Ohad Mazor, Ran Zichel","doi":"10.14573/altex.2105251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The pharmacopeia mouse neutralization assay (PMNA) is the standard method for determining the potency of pharmaceutical botulinum antitoxins. However, a PMNA requires a large number of mice, and, thus, an alternative in vitro method to replace it is needed. Herein, we developed an in vitro SiMa cell line-based neutralization assay (SBNA), compatible with a PMNA design, for therapeutic antitoxins against type E botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT/E). The SBNA measures the residual cellular activity of BoNT/E following antitoxin neutralization in the SiMa lysate using a specific quantitative sandwich ELISA for its cleaved cellular target protein SNAP-25. The potencies of different pharmaceutical antitoxin preparations were determined by applying two different quantification approaches: (1) a cutoff value, in accordance with the pharmacopeia concept, and (2) nonlinear regression of a standard curve generated by serial dilutions of a standard antitoxin. Both approaches achieved accurate potencies compared to the PMNA (average %RE of ~16%). Furthermore, the SBNA was able to determine in vitro, for the first time, the accurate neutralizing activity (%RE ≤ 20) of next-generation equine and rabbit therapeutic antitoxins. Collectively, a high correlation between SBNA and PMNA results was obtained for all antitoxin preparations (r = 0.99, P < 0.0001 for the standard curve approach, and r = 0.97, p < 0.0001 for the cutoff approach). In conclusion, the SBNA can potentially replace the PMNA and markedly reduce the need for laboratory animals for the approval of botulinum antitoxin preparations.</p>","PeriodicalId":520550,"journal":{"name":"ALTEX","volume":" ","pages":"113-122"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ALTEX","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.2105251","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/11/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
The pharmacopeia mouse neutralization assay (PMNA) is the standard method for determining the potency of pharmaceutical botulinum antitoxins. However, a PMNA requires a large number of mice, and, thus, an alternative in vitro method to replace it is needed. Herein, we developed an in vitro SiMa cell line-based neutralization assay (SBNA), compatible with a PMNA design, for therapeutic antitoxins against type E botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT/E). The SBNA measures the residual cellular activity of BoNT/E following antitoxin neutralization in the SiMa lysate using a specific quantitative sandwich ELISA for its cleaved cellular target protein SNAP-25. The potencies of different pharmaceutical antitoxin preparations were determined by applying two different quantification approaches: (1) a cutoff value, in accordance with the pharmacopeia concept, and (2) nonlinear regression of a standard curve generated by serial dilutions of a standard antitoxin. Both approaches achieved accurate potencies compared to the PMNA (average %RE of ~16%). Furthermore, the SBNA was able to determine in vitro, for the first time, the accurate neutralizing activity (%RE ≤ 20) of next-generation equine and rabbit therapeutic antitoxins. Collectively, a high correlation between SBNA and PMNA results was obtained for all antitoxin preparations (r = 0.99, P < 0.0001 for the standard curve approach, and r = 0.97, p < 0.0001 for the cutoff approach). In conclusion, the SBNA can potentially replace the PMNA and markedly reduce the need for laboratory animals for the approval of botulinum antitoxin preparations.