Mental well-being, health, and locus of control in Danish adults before and during COVID-19.

IF 3.8 4区 医学 Q1 Medicine
Acta Neuropsychiatrica Pub Date : 2022-04-01 Epub Date: 2021-11-24 DOI:10.1017/neu.2021.37
Hanne Würtzen, Line Helene Clausen, Peter Birkelund Andersen, Ziggi Ivan Santini, Jakob Erkmen, Heidi Frølund Pedersen
{"title":"Mental well-being, health, and locus of control in Danish adults before and during COVID-19.","authors":"Hanne Würtzen,&nbsp;Line Helene Clausen,&nbsp;Peter Birkelund Andersen,&nbsp;Ziggi Ivan Santini,&nbsp;Jakob Erkmen,&nbsp;Heidi Frølund Pedersen","doi":"10.1017/neu.2021.37","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate the possible impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on general health, mental well-being, and experiences of control compared to pre-pandemic populations. Our hypotheses were that we would observe a significantly lower level of psychological well-being and general health in the 2020 sample compared to the pre-pandemic samples, and that we would observe younger age groups to be the most affected.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Two representative Danish populations (2016, n = 1656) and (2017, n = 3366) were compared to a representative Danish population (2020, n = 1538) sampled during the first lockdown in May 2020. Two-tailed tests of proportions were used to investigate possible differences between samples in proportions reporting poorer mental well-being measured by 5-item World Health Organization Well-Being Index, general health, and internal locus of control.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Younger men (aged 18-24) and younger women (aged 18-44) as well as elderly women (aged 65-74) reported lower mental well-being during the early phase of the pandemic compared to the population from 2016. Both women and men in 2020 reported significantly lower levels of internal locus of control compared to the 2017 sample. This was especially true for younger men and women. There were no statistically significant differences in general health between populations.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study partly supports the hypothesis that the Covid-19 pandemic affected mental well-being negatively among younger persons. However, longitudinal studies are needed to investigate possible long-term effects of the pandemic on mental health and well-being. Further, qualitative studies are needed to investigate the in-depth consequences of Covid-19.</p>","PeriodicalId":7066,"journal":{"name":"Acta Neuropsychiatrica","volume":"34 2","pages":"93-98"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Neuropsychiatrica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/neu.2021.37","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/11/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate the possible impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on general health, mental well-being, and experiences of control compared to pre-pandemic populations. Our hypotheses were that we would observe a significantly lower level of psychological well-being and general health in the 2020 sample compared to the pre-pandemic samples, and that we would observe younger age groups to be the most affected.

Method: Two representative Danish populations (2016, n = 1656) and (2017, n = 3366) were compared to a representative Danish population (2020, n = 1538) sampled during the first lockdown in May 2020. Two-tailed tests of proportions were used to investigate possible differences between samples in proportions reporting poorer mental well-being measured by 5-item World Health Organization Well-Being Index, general health, and internal locus of control.

Results: Younger men (aged 18-24) and younger women (aged 18-44) as well as elderly women (aged 65-74) reported lower mental well-being during the early phase of the pandemic compared to the population from 2016. Both women and men in 2020 reported significantly lower levels of internal locus of control compared to the 2017 sample. This was especially true for younger men and women. There were no statistically significant differences in general health between populations.

Discussion: This study partly supports the hypothesis that the Covid-19 pandemic affected mental well-being negatively among younger persons. However, longitudinal studies are needed to investigate possible long-term effects of the pandemic on mental health and well-being. Further, qualitative studies are needed to investigate the in-depth consequences of Covid-19.

新冠肺炎前后丹麦成年人的心理健康、健康和控制点。
目的:本研究的目的是调查与大流行前人群相比,Covid-19大流行对总体健康、心理健康和控制经历的可能影响。我们的假设是,与大流行前的样本相比,我们将观察到2020年样本中的心理健康和总体健康水平明显较低,并且我们将观察到年轻年龄组受到的影响最大。方法:将两个具有代表性的丹麦人群(2016年,n = 1656)和(2017年,n = 3366)与2020年5月第一次封锁期间抽样的具有代表性的丹麦人群(2020年,n = 1538)进行比较。采用比例双尾检验来调查报告较差心理健康的样本之间可能存在的差异,该比例由世界卫生组织幸福指数、一般健康状况和内部控制点的五项指标衡量。结果:与2016年的人口相比,在大流行的早期阶段,年轻男性(18-24岁)、年轻女性(18-44岁)以及老年女性(65-74岁)报告的心理健康状况较低。与2017年的样本相比,2020年的女性和男性都报告了明显较低的内部控制点水平。这对年轻的男性和女性来说尤其如此。人群之间的总体健康状况没有统计学上的显著差异。讨论:本研究在一定程度上支持了Covid-19大流行对年轻人心理健康产生负面影响的假设。然而,需要进行纵向研究,以调查大流行对心理健康和福祉可能产生的长期影响。此外,需要进行定性研究,以深入调查Covid-19的后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
Acta Neuropsychiatrica 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
5.30%
发文量
30
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Neuropsychiatrica is an international journal focussing on translational neuropsychiatry. It publishes high-quality original research papers and reviews. The Journal''s scope specifically highlights the pathway from discovery to clinical applications, healthcare and global health that can be viewed broadly as the spectrum of work that marks the pathway from discovery to global health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信