Effectiveness of Biofeedback Therapy in Patients with Bowel Dysfunction Following Rectal Cancer Surgery: A Systemic Review with Meta-Analysis.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2022-02-02 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.2147/TCRM.S344375
Haoze Li, Ce Guo, Jiale Gao, Hongwei Yao
{"title":"Effectiveness of Biofeedback Therapy in Patients with Bowel Dysfunction Following Rectal Cancer Surgery: A Systemic Review with Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Haoze Li,&nbsp;Ce Guo,&nbsp;Jiale Gao,&nbsp;Hongwei Yao","doi":"10.2147/TCRM.S344375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify, systematically review and synthesize the evidence on the effectiveness of biofeedback therapy in patients with bowel dysfunction following rectal cancer surgery.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Four electronic databases (PubMed 1974-2021; Embase1980-2021; Cochrane databases and the trial registers) were systematically searched by reviewers from inception through March 2021.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies, and case series studies were included for adults with bowel dysfunction following rectal cancer surgery. All participants received an intervention of biofeedback treatment. Any outcomes that can evaluate the patient's bowel function were the primary research endpoint, while the quality of life was the second endpoint. The disagreements between the two reviewers were resolved after discussion and the third independent reviewer's ruling. As a result, 12 of 185 studies met selection criteria and were included in the review.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>We designed an electronic data extraction form and data were extracted independently. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias, the MINORS scale, and the Institute of Health Economics scale.</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>Meta-analyses were conducted for case series only and narrative syntheses were completed. Key findings included significant improvements in bowel function as well as health-related quality of life after biofeedback therapy. (Wexner score: t=7, MD=3.33; 95% CI [2.48, 4.18]) and (Vaizey score: t=3, MD=2.46; 95% CI [1.98, 2.93]). Subgroup analysis of Wexner score: receiving electrical stimulation therapy (t=3, MD=2.36; 95% CI [1.51, 3.22]), not receiving electrical stimulation (t=4, MD=3.79;95% CI[2.66, 4.93]); not receiving adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (t=3, MD=2.42;95% CI[1.61, 3.24]), chemotherapy and radiotherapy (t=1, MD=4.10; 95% CI [2.90, 5.30]), radiotherapy and chemotherapy on parts of patients (t=2, MD=3.46;95% CI [1.41, 5.51]), chemotherapy (t=1, MD=4.81; 95% CI [3.38, 6.24]); performing ISR (t=2, MD=3.32;95% CI [0.37, 6.27]), performing AR (t=4, MD=3.08; 95% CI [2.12, 4.04]), performing PLRAS surgery (t=1, MD=4.10;95% CI[2.90, 5.30]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although biofeedback therapy may improve intestinal function and quality of life as well as anal function reflected by ARM after surgery, patient satisfaction is still unclear. Due to the scarcity of data, good-quality research is required to delve deeper.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration number: </strong>CRD42020192658.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/bb/e4/tcrm-18-71.PMC8819167.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S344375","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objective: To identify, systematically review and synthesize the evidence on the effectiveness of biofeedback therapy in patients with bowel dysfunction following rectal cancer surgery.

Data sources: Four electronic databases (PubMed 1974-2021; Embase1980-2021; Cochrane databases and the trial registers) were systematically searched by reviewers from inception through March 2021.

Study selection: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies, and case series studies were included for adults with bowel dysfunction following rectal cancer surgery. All participants received an intervention of biofeedback treatment. Any outcomes that can evaluate the patient's bowel function were the primary research endpoint, while the quality of life was the second endpoint. The disagreements between the two reviewers were resolved after discussion and the third independent reviewer's ruling. As a result, 12 of 185 studies met selection criteria and were included in the review.

Data extraction: We designed an electronic data extraction form and data were extracted independently. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias, the MINORS scale, and the Institute of Health Economics scale.

Data synthesis: Meta-analyses were conducted for case series only and narrative syntheses were completed. Key findings included significant improvements in bowel function as well as health-related quality of life after biofeedback therapy. (Wexner score: t=7, MD=3.33; 95% CI [2.48, 4.18]) and (Vaizey score: t=3, MD=2.46; 95% CI [1.98, 2.93]). Subgroup analysis of Wexner score: receiving electrical stimulation therapy (t=3, MD=2.36; 95% CI [1.51, 3.22]), not receiving electrical stimulation (t=4, MD=3.79;95% CI[2.66, 4.93]); not receiving adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (t=3, MD=2.42;95% CI[1.61, 3.24]), chemotherapy and radiotherapy (t=1, MD=4.10; 95% CI [2.90, 5.30]), radiotherapy and chemotherapy on parts of patients (t=2, MD=3.46;95% CI [1.41, 5.51]), chemotherapy (t=1, MD=4.81; 95% CI [3.38, 6.24]); performing ISR (t=2, MD=3.32;95% CI [0.37, 6.27]), performing AR (t=4, MD=3.08; 95% CI [2.12, 4.04]), performing PLRAS surgery (t=1, MD=4.10;95% CI[2.90, 5.30]).

Conclusion: Although biofeedback therapy may improve intestinal function and quality of life as well as anal function reflected by ARM after surgery, patient satisfaction is still unclear. Due to the scarcity of data, good-quality research is required to delve deeper.

Clinical trial registration number: CRD42020192658.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

生物反馈疗法在直肠癌手术后肠功能障碍患者中的有效性:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
目的:对生物反馈疗法治疗直肠癌术后肠功能障碍的有效性进行识别、系统回顾和综合。数据来源:四个电子数据库(PubMed 1974-2021;embase1980 - 2021;从研究开始到2021年3月,审稿人系统地检索了Cochrane数据库和试验注册库。研究选择:随机对照试验(RCTs)、队列研究和病例系列研究纳入了直肠癌手术后肠功能障碍的成年人。所有参与者均接受生物反馈治疗干预。任何能够评估患者肠道功能的结果都是主要研究终点,而生活质量是第二终点。两位审稿人之间的分歧在经过讨论和第三位独立审稿人的裁决后得到解决。结果,185项研究中有12项符合选择标准,被纳入本综述。数据提取:设计电子数据提取表,数据独立提取。采用Cochrane偏倚风险量表、未成年人量表和卫生经济学研究所量表评估纳入研究的方法学质量。数据综合:仅对病例系列进行meta分析,并完成叙事综合。主要发现包括生物反馈治疗后肠道功能和健康相关生活质量的显著改善。(Wexner评分:t=7, MD=3.33;95% CI[2.48, 4.18])和(Vaizey评分:t=3, MD=2.46;95% ci[1.98, 2.93])。Wexner评分亚组分析:接受电刺激治疗(t=3, MD=2.36;95% CI[1.51, 3.22]),未接受电刺激(t=4, MD=3.79;95% CI[2.66, 4.93]);未接受辅助放化疗(t=3, MD=2.42;95% CI[1.61, 3.24]),化疗和放疗(t=1, MD=4.10;95% CI[2.90, 5.30])、部分患者放化疗(t=2, MD=3.46;95% CI[1.41, 5.51])、化疗(t=1, MD=4.81;95% ci [3.38, 6.24]);进行ISR (t=2, MD=3.32;95% CI[0.37, 6.27]),进行AR (t=4, MD=3.08;95% CI[2.12, 4.04]),行PLRAS手术(t=1, MD=4.10;95% CI[2.90, 5.30])。结论:虽然生物反馈疗法可以改善术后肠道功能和生活质量以及ARM反映的肛门功能,但患者满意度尚不清楚。由于数据的稀缺性,需要进行高质量的深入研究。临床试验注册号:CRD42020192658。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信