Ethics and antibiotic resistance.

IF 6.7 2区 医学 Q1 Medicine
Euzebiusz Jamrozik, George S Heriot
{"title":"Ethics and antibiotic resistance.","authors":"Euzebiusz Jamrozik, George S Heriot","doi":"10.1093/bmb/ldab030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction or background: </strong>Antibiotic resistance raises ethical issues due to the severe and inequitably distributed consequences caused by individual actions and policies.</p><p><strong>Sources of data: </strong>Synthesis of ethical, scientific and clinical literature.</p><p><strong>Areas of agreement: </strong>Ethical analyses have focused on the moral responsibilities of patients to complete antibiotic courses, resistance as a tragedy of the commons and attempts to limit use through antibiotic stewardship.</p><p><strong>Areas of controversy: </strong>Each of these analyses has significant limitations and can result in self-defeating or overly narrow implications for policy.</p><p><strong>Growing points: </strong>More complex analyses focus on ethical implications of ubiquitous asymptomatic carriage of resistant bacteria, non-linear outcomes within and between patients over time and global variation in resistant disease burdens.</p><p><strong>Areas timely for developing research: </strong>Neglected topics include the harms of antibiotic use, including off-target effects on the human microbiome, and the lack of evidence guiding most antibiotic prescription decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":9280,"journal":{"name":"British medical bulletin","volume":"141 1","pages":"4-14"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8935610/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British medical bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldab030","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction or background: Antibiotic resistance raises ethical issues due to the severe and inequitably distributed consequences caused by individual actions and policies.

Sources of data: Synthesis of ethical, scientific and clinical literature.

Areas of agreement: Ethical analyses have focused on the moral responsibilities of patients to complete antibiotic courses, resistance as a tragedy of the commons and attempts to limit use through antibiotic stewardship.

Areas of controversy: Each of these analyses has significant limitations and can result in self-defeating or overly narrow implications for policy.

Growing points: More complex analyses focus on ethical implications of ubiquitous asymptomatic carriage of resistant bacteria, non-linear outcomes within and between patients over time and global variation in resistant disease burdens.

Areas timely for developing research: Neglected topics include the harms of antibiotic use, including off-target effects on the human microbiome, and the lack of evidence guiding most antibiotic prescription decisions.

Abstract Image

伦理与抗生素耐药性
导言或背景:抗生素耐药性引发了伦理问题,因为个人行为和政策造成了严重且分布不均的后果:数据来源:伦理、科学和临床文献综述:伦理分析侧重于患者完成抗生素疗程的道德责任、抗药性是公地悲剧以及通过抗生素管理限制使用的尝试:这些分析都有很大的局限性,可能会导致自食其果或对政策的影响过于狭隘:增长点:更复杂的分析侧重于无处不在的无症状耐药细菌携带的伦理影响、病人内部和病人之间随时间变化的非线性结果以及耐药疾病负担的全球变化:被忽视的课题包括抗生素使用的危害,包括对人类微生物组的非目标效应,以及大多数抗生素处方决策缺乏证据指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British medical bulletin
British medical bulletin 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
1.50%
发文量
24
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: British Medical Bulletin is a multidisciplinary publication, which comprises high quality reviews aimed at generalist physicians, junior doctors, and medical students in both developed and developing countries. Its key aims are to provide interpretations of growing points in medicine by trusted experts in the field, and to assist practitioners in incorporating not just evidence but new conceptual ways of thinking into their practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信