Evaluating an automated machine learning model that predicts visual acuity outcomes in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

Abdallah Abbas, Ciara O'Byrne, Dun Jack Fu, Gabriella Moraes, Konstantinos Balaskas, Robbert Struyven, Sara Beqiri, Siegfried K Wagner, Edward Korot, Pearse A Keane
{"title":"Evaluating an automated machine learning model that predicts visual acuity outcomes in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration.","authors":"Abdallah Abbas, Ciara O'Byrne, Dun Jack Fu, Gabriella Moraes, Konstantinos Balaskas, Robbert Struyven, Sara Beqiri, Siegfried K Wagner, Edward Korot, Pearse A Keane","doi":"10.1007/s00417-021-05544-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) is a major global cause of blindness. Whilst anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) treatment is effective, response varies considerably between individuals. Thus, patients face substantial uncertainty regarding their future ability to perform daily tasks. In this study, we evaluate the performance of an automated machine learning (AutoML) model which predicts visual acuity (VA) outcomes in patients receiving treatment for nAMD, in comparison to a manually coded model built using the same dataset. Furthermore, we evaluate model performance across ethnic groups and analyse how the models reach their predictions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Binary classification models were trained to predict whether patients' VA would be 'Above' or 'Below' a score of 70 one year after initiating treatment, measured using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart. The AutoML model was built using the Google Cloud Platform, whilst the bespoke model was trained using an XGBoost framework. Models were compared and analysed using the What-if Tool (WIT), a novel model-agnostic interpretability tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our study included 1631 eyes from patients attending Moorfields Eye Hospital. The AutoML model (area under the curve [AUC], 0.849) achieved a highly similar performance to the XGBoost model (AUC, 0.847). Using the WIT, we found that the models over-predicted negative outcomes in Asian patients and performed worse in those with an ethnic category of Other. Baseline VA, age and ethnicity were the most important determinants of model predictions. Partial dependence plot analysis revealed a sigmoidal relationship between baseline VA and the probability of an outcome of 'Above'.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We have described and validated an AutoML-WIT pipeline which enables clinicians with minimal coding skills to match the performance of a state-of-the-art algorithm and obtain explainable predictions.</p>","PeriodicalId":520634,"journal":{"name":"Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie","volume":" ","pages":"2461-2473"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9325856/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-021-05544-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/2/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) is a major global cause of blindness. Whilst anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) treatment is effective, response varies considerably between individuals. Thus, patients face substantial uncertainty regarding their future ability to perform daily tasks. In this study, we evaluate the performance of an automated machine learning (AutoML) model which predicts visual acuity (VA) outcomes in patients receiving treatment for nAMD, in comparison to a manually coded model built using the same dataset. Furthermore, we evaluate model performance across ethnic groups and analyse how the models reach their predictions.

Methods: Binary classification models were trained to predict whether patients' VA would be 'Above' or 'Below' a score of 70 one year after initiating treatment, measured using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart. The AutoML model was built using the Google Cloud Platform, whilst the bespoke model was trained using an XGBoost framework. Models were compared and analysed using the What-if Tool (WIT), a novel model-agnostic interpretability tool.

Results: Our study included 1631 eyes from patients attending Moorfields Eye Hospital. The AutoML model (area under the curve [AUC], 0.849) achieved a highly similar performance to the XGBoost model (AUC, 0.847). Using the WIT, we found that the models over-predicted negative outcomes in Asian patients and performed worse in those with an ethnic category of Other. Baseline VA, age and ethnicity were the most important determinants of model predictions. Partial dependence plot analysis revealed a sigmoidal relationship between baseline VA and the probability of an outcome of 'Above'.

Conclusion: We have described and validated an AutoML-WIT pipeline which enables clinicians with minimal coding skills to match the performance of a state-of-the-art algorithm and obtain explainable predictions.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

评估预测新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性患者视力结果的自动机器学习模型。
目的:新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性(nAMD)是全球失明的主要原因。虽然抗血管内皮生长因子(anti-VEGF)治疗是有效的,但个体之间的反应差异很大。因此,患者在未来执行日常任务的能力方面面临着很大的不确定性。在这项研究中,我们评估了自动机器学习(AutoML)模型的性能,该模型预测了接受nAMD治疗的患者的视力(VA)结果,并与使用相同数据集构建的手动编码模型进行了比较。此外,我们评估了不同种族群体的模型性能,并分析了模型如何实现预测。方法:使用早期治疗糖尿病视网膜病变研究(ETDRS)图表,训练二元分类模型来预测患者的VA在开始治疗一年后是“高于”还是“低于”70分。AutoML模型是使用谷歌云平台构建的,而定制模型是使用XGBoost框架进行训练的。使用假设工具(What-if Tool, WIT)对模型进行比较和分析,这是一种新颖的模型不可知的可解释性工具。结果:我们的研究包括来自Moorfields眼科医院的患者的1631只眼睛。AutoML模型(曲线下面积[AUC], 0.849)与XGBoost模型(AUC, 0.847)的性能非常相似。使用WIT,我们发现该模型过度预测了亚洲患者的负面结果,而在其他种族类别的患者中表现更差。基线VA、年龄和种族是模型预测的最重要决定因素。部分依赖图分析显示基线VA与结果“高于”的概率之间呈s型关系。结论:我们已经描述并验证了一个AutoML-WIT管道,它使临床医生用最少的编码技能来匹配最先进的算法的性能,并获得可解释的预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信