Patient Satisfaction With Care Is Associated With Better Outcomes in Function and Pain 1 Year After Lumbar Spine Surgery.

IF 1.6 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews Pub Date : 2022-01-17 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.17294/2330-0698.1883
Björn Knutsson, Bakir Kadum, Ted Eneqvist, Sebastian Mukka, Arkan S Sayed-Noor
{"title":"Patient Satisfaction With Care Is Associated With Better Outcomes in Function and Pain 1 Year After Lumbar Spine Surgery.","authors":"Björn Knutsson,&nbsp;Bakir Kadum,&nbsp;Ted Eneqvist,&nbsp;Sebastian Mukka,&nbsp;Arkan S Sayed-Noor","doi":"10.17294/2330-0698.1883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>There has been increasing interest in patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) to evaluate the patient experience and satisfaction with care. We conducted a prospective multicenter cohort study to determine any association between patients' satisfaction of care and their outcomes 1 year after lumbar spine surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Satisfaction with care was recorded through telephone interviews and a standardized questionnaire. Baseline data collection (300 patients) and 1-year follow-up (209 patients) were conducted through The Swedish National Register for Spine Surgery (Swespine). Exposures were patient experiences, health care professional (HCP) attitudes, shared decision-making, and overall satisfaction with care. Associations were evaluated using adjusted analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Satisfaction with HCP attitudes was not associated with improvements at 1 year in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) or back pain; however a significantly greater improvement in leg pain score was reported by patients who were highly satisfied (3.0 points) versus the moderate/low satisfaction group (1.3 points; P=0.008). For shared decision-making, high satisfaction was associated with significantly greater improvements, as compared to moderate/low satisfaction, in ODI (20 vs 11 points; P=0.001), back pain (2.6 vs 1.7 points; P=0.05), and leg pain (3.2 vs 1.9 points, P=0.007). Similarly, high overall satisfaction with care was associated with significantly greater improvements in ODI (18 vs 10 points; P=0.02), back pain (3.2 vs 0.6 points; P<0.001), and leg pain (2.6 vs 1.1 points; P=0.009).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings indicate that shared decision-making on perioperative care and patients' overall satisfaction with care were associated with better health outcomes 1 year after lumbar spine surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":16724,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8772612/pdf/jpcrr-9.1.7.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17294/2330-0698.1883","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Purpose: There has been increasing interest in patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) to evaluate the patient experience and satisfaction with care. We conducted a prospective multicenter cohort study to determine any association between patients' satisfaction of care and their outcomes 1 year after lumbar spine surgery.

Methods: Satisfaction with care was recorded through telephone interviews and a standardized questionnaire. Baseline data collection (300 patients) and 1-year follow-up (209 patients) were conducted through The Swedish National Register for Spine Surgery (Swespine). Exposures were patient experiences, health care professional (HCP) attitudes, shared decision-making, and overall satisfaction with care. Associations were evaluated using adjusted analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) models.

Results: Satisfaction with HCP attitudes was not associated with improvements at 1 year in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) or back pain; however a significantly greater improvement in leg pain score was reported by patients who were highly satisfied (3.0 points) versus the moderate/low satisfaction group (1.3 points; P=0.008). For shared decision-making, high satisfaction was associated with significantly greater improvements, as compared to moderate/low satisfaction, in ODI (20 vs 11 points; P=0.001), back pain (2.6 vs 1.7 points; P=0.05), and leg pain (3.2 vs 1.9 points, P=0.007). Similarly, high overall satisfaction with care was associated with significantly greater improvements in ODI (18 vs 10 points; P=0.02), back pain (3.2 vs 0.6 points; P<0.001), and leg pain (2.6 vs 1.1 points; P=0.009).

Conclusions: Findings indicate that shared decision-making on perioperative care and patients' overall satisfaction with care were associated with better health outcomes 1 year after lumbar spine surgery.

患者对护理的满意度与腰椎手术后1年功能和疼痛的改善相关。
目的:人们对患者报告体验测量(PREMs)越来越感兴趣,以评估患者的体验和护理满意度。我们进行了一项前瞻性多中心队列研究,以确定腰椎手术后1年患者护理满意度与其预后之间的关系。方法:采用电话访谈和标准化问卷调查的方式记录护理满意度。基线数据收集(300例患者)和1年随访(209例患者)通过瑞典国家脊柱外科登记(Swespine)进行。暴露因素包括患者经历、卫生保健专业人员(HCP)的态度、共同决策和对护理的总体满意度。使用协方差校正分析(ANCOVA)模型评估相关性。结果:对HCP态度的满意度与1年后Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)或背部疼痛的改善无关;然而,高满意度组(3.0分)与中/低满意度组(1.3分;P = 0.008)。在共同决策方面,与中等/低满意度相比,在ODI方面,高满意度与显著更大的改善相关(20分vs 11分;P=0.001),背部疼痛(2.6 vs 1.7;P=0.05),腿部疼痛(3.2 vs 1.9, P=0.007)。同样,对护理的高总体满意度与ODI的显著改善相关(18分vs 10分;P=0.02),背部疼痛(3.2 vs 0.6分;结论:研究结果表明,围手术期护理的共同决策和患者对护理的总体满意度与腰椎手术后1年更好的健康结局相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews
Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
自引率
5.90%
发文量
35
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信