Embracing or relinquishing sources of power in interprofessional communication: implications for patient-centered speaking up.

IF 18 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2021-11-07 DOI:10.1080/13561820.2021.1975665
Susan E Farrell, Naike Bochatay, Sara Kim
{"title":"Embracing or relinquishing sources of power in interprofessional communication: implications for patient-centered speaking up.","authors":"Susan E Farrell, Naike Bochatay, Sara Kim","doi":"10.1080/13561820.2021.1975665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Health professionals working in an interprofessional work environment are entrusted to speak up on behalf of patients. However, that environment is comprised of dynamic intra- and interprofessional hierarchies, characterized by power differentials that affect speaking up behaviors. Drawing on the social bases of power and on power/interaction theory, we analyzed focus group and interview transcripts of 62 health professionals' accounts of speaking up. We focused on their primary sources of power, and described factors associated with health professionals' embracing power to speak up for patient safety, as well as those associated with relinquishing power and remaining silent. Nurses primarily employed direct patient information as a source of power to advocate for patients. Senior nurses and attending physicians exercised their legitimate power through titles or expertise, and when embracing that power, often influenced the healthcare team's speaking up behaviors and the team environment. Physician trainees perceived to have limited sources of power. Participants reported using hospital policies, relationships, and humor for engaging in speaking up behavior. Relinquishing power and remaining silent were associated with fear, anxiety, and lack of confidence. Given the complex, hierarchical environment in healthcare, leaders' inclusive behaviors for setting a culture for speaking up, including modeling speaking up, are critical.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":" ","pages":"738-745"},"PeriodicalIF":18.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2021.1975665","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/11/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Health professionals working in an interprofessional work environment are entrusted to speak up on behalf of patients. However, that environment is comprised of dynamic intra- and interprofessional hierarchies, characterized by power differentials that affect speaking up behaviors. Drawing on the social bases of power and on power/interaction theory, we analyzed focus group and interview transcripts of 62 health professionals' accounts of speaking up. We focused on their primary sources of power, and described factors associated with health professionals' embracing power to speak up for patient safety, as well as those associated with relinquishing power and remaining silent. Nurses primarily employed direct patient information as a source of power to advocate for patients. Senior nurses and attending physicians exercised their legitimate power through titles or expertise, and when embracing that power, often influenced the healthcare team's speaking up behaviors and the team environment. Physician trainees perceived to have limited sources of power. Participants reported using hospital policies, relationships, and humor for engaging in speaking up behavior. Relinquishing power and remaining silent were associated with fear, anxiety, and lack of confidence. Given the complex, hierarchical environment in healthcare, leaders' inclusive behaviors for setting a culture for speaking up, including modeling speaking up, are critical.

在跨专业交流中拥抱或放弃权力来源:以患者为中心大声说话的意义。
在跨专业工作环境中工作的医疗专业人员受托代表患者大声疾呼。然而,这种环境是由动态的专业内和专业间等级制度组成的,其特点是权力差异会影响直言不讳的行为。根据权力的社会基础和权力/互动理论,我们分析了 62 名医疗专业人员关于大声疾呼的焦点小组和访谈记录。我们重点研究了他们的主要权力来源,并描述了与医护人员拥护权力、为患者安全大声疾呼相关的因素,以及与放弃权力、保持沉默相关的因素。护士主要将患者的直接信息作为为患者代言的权力来源。资深护士和主治医师通过职称或专业知识行使其合法权力,在行使权力时,往往会影响医护团队的大声疾呼行为和团队环境。实习医生认为他们的权力来源有限。学员们报告说,他们利用医院政策、人际关系和幽默感来参与畅所欲言行为。放弃权力和保持沉默与恐惧、焦虑和缺乏自信有关。鉴于医疗行业复杂的等级环境,领导者在建立畅所欲言文化方面的包容性行为(包括树立畅所欲言的榜样)至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书