Jutta M Stoffers-Winterling, Ole Jakob Storebø, Mickey T Kongerslev, Erlend Faltinsen, Adan Todorovac, Mie Sedoc Jørgensen, Christian P Sales, Henriette Edemann Callesen, Johanne Pereira Ribeiro, Birgit A Völlm, Klaus Lieb, Erik Simonsen
{"title":"Psychotherapies for borderline personality disorder: a focused systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Jutta M Stoffers-Winterling, Ole Jakob Storebø, Mickey T Kongerslev, Erlend Faltinsen, Adan Todorovac, Mie Sedoc Jørgensen, Christian P Sales, Henriette Edemann Callesen, Johanne Pereira Ribeiro, Birgit A Völlm, Klaus Lieb, Erik Simonsen","doi":"10.1192/bjp.2021.204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A recently updated Cochrane review supports the efficacy of psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder (BPD).</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To evaluate the effects of standalone and add-on psychotherapeutic treatments more concisely.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We applied the same methods as the 2020 Cochrane review, but focused on adult samples and comparisons of active treatments and unspecific control conditions. Standalone treatments (i.e. necessarily including individual psychotherapy as either the sole or one of several treatment components) and add-on interventions (i.e. complementing any ongoing individual BPD treatment) were analysed separately. Primary outcomes were BPD severity, self-harm, suicide-related outcomes and psychosocial functioning. Secondary outcomes were remaining BPD diagnostic criteria, depression and attrition.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-one randomised controlled trials totalling 1870 participants were identified. Among standalone treatments, statistically significant effects of low overall certainty were observed for dialectical behaviour therapy (self-harm: standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.54, <i>P</i> = 0.006; psychosocial functioning: SMD -0.51, <i>P</i> = 0.01) and mentalisation-based treatment (self-harm: risk ratio 0.51, <i>P</i> < 0.0007; suicide-related outcomes: risk ratio 0.10, <i>P</i> < 0.0001). For adjunctive interventions, moderate-quality evidence of beneficial effects was observed for DBT skills training (BPD severity: SMD -0.66, <i>P</i> = 0.002; psychosocial functioning: SMD -0.45, <i>P</i> = 0.002), and statistically significant low-certainty evidence was observed for the emotion regulation group (BPD severity: mean difference -8.49, <i>P</i> < 0.00001), manual-assisted cognitive therapy (self-harm: mean difference -3.03, <i>P</i> = 0.03; suicide-related outcomes: SMD -0.96, <i>P</i> = 0.005) and the systems training for emotional predictability and problem-solving (BPD severity: SMD -0.48, <i>P</i> = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is reasonable evidence to conclude that psychotherapeutic interventions are helpful for individuals with BPD. Replication studies are needed to enhance the certainty of findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":520791,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science","volume":" ","pages":"538-552"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2021.204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19
Abstract
Background: A recently updated Cochrane review supports the efficacy of psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder (BPD).
Aims: To evaluate the effects of standalone and add-on psychotherapeutic treatments more concisely.
Method: We applied the same methods as the 2020 Cochrane review, but focused on adult samples and comparisons of active treatments and unspecific control conditions. Standalone treatments (i.e. necessarily including individual psychotherapy as either the sole or one of several treatment components) and add-on interventions (i.e. complementing any ongoing individual BPD treatment) were analysed separately. Primary outcomes were BPD severity, self-harm, suicide-related outcomes and psychosocial functioning. Secondary outcomes were remaining BPD diagnostic criteria, depression and attrition.
Results: Thirty-one randomised controlled trials totalling 1870 participants were identified. Among standalone treatments, statistically significant effects of low overall certainty were observed for dialectical behaviour therapy (self-harm: standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.54, P = 0.006; psychosocial functioning: SMD -0.51, P = 0.01) and mentalisation-based treatment (self-harm: risk ratio 0.51, P < 0.0007; suicide-related outcomes: risk ratio 0.10, P < 0.0001). For adjunctive interventions, moderate-quality evidence of beneficial effects was observed for DBT skills training (BPD severity: SMD -0.66, P = 0.002; psychosocial functioning: SMD -0.45, P = 0.002), and statistically significant low-certainty evidence was observed for the emotion regulation group (BPD severity: mean difference -8.49, P < 0.00001), manual-assisted cognitive therapy (self-harm: mean difference -3.03, P = 0.03; suicide-related outcomes: SMD -0.96, P = 0.005) and the systems training for emotional predictability and problem-solving (BPD severity: SMD -0.48, P = 0.002).
Conclusions: There is reasonable evidence to conclude that psychotherapeutic interventions are helpful for individuals with BPD. Replication studies are needed to enhance the certainty of findings.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
