Observation Variation in Ultrasonography Assessment of Thyroid Nodules.

Q3 Medicine
Yasaman Sharifi, Susan Shafiei, Hamed Tabesh, Behzad Aminzadeh, Parvaneh Layegh, Abolfazl Mahmoodzadeh, Seyed Rasoul Zakavi, Saeid Eslami
{"title":"Observation Variation in Ultrasonography Assessment of Thyroid Nodules.","authors":"Yasaman Sharifi,&nbsp;Susan Shafiei,&nbsp;Hamed Tabesh,&nbsp;Behzad Aminzadeh,&nbsp;Parvaneh Layegh,&nbsp;Abolfazl Mahmoodzadeh,&nbsp;Seyed Rasoul Zakavi,&nbsp;Saeid Eslami","doi":"10.22038/AOJNMB.2021.59283.1411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Accurate detection and competent management of thyroid nodules, as a common disease, basically depends on the reliability of the ultrasonography (US) report. In this research, we evaluated inter and intra-observer variation among ultrasonography reporters, based on ACR-TIRADS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, 345 thyroid US images of 150 patients were reviewed. Three clinicians with at least 6-year experience in thyroid US reviewed the images twice at 6-8 weeks' intervals. Composition, echogenicity, shape, margin, and echogenic foci based on ACR-TIRADS were reported, independently. Inter and intra-observer variations were calculated based on Cohen's Kappa statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>345 ultrasonography images of 150 patients with thyroid nodules (83 women and 67 men) with a mean age of 65 years were reviewed. Moderate to the substantial intra-observer agreement was achieved with the highest Kapa value in the category of shape (k=0.61-0.77). For TIRADS level, the moderate intra-observer agreement was observed (k=0.42-0.46). Inter-observer agreement for the US category of thyroid nodules was obtained slightly to moderate. Composition (k=0.42 and 0.51) and echogenicity (k=0.45 and 0.46) showed the highest overall agreement and margin showed the lowest overall agreement (k=0.18 and 0.19). In assessing TIRADS level of nodules, a fair agreement was obtained (k=0.23 and 0.29).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Moderate to substantial intra-observer agreement and slight to moderate inter-observer variation for evaluation of thyroid nodules; shows the need for a computer-aided diagnosis system based on artificial intelligence to assist our physicians in differentiating thyroid nodule characteristics based on explicit image features. An additional training course based on ACR-TIRADS for physicians can be another useful recommendation.</p>","PeriodicalId":8503,"journal":{"name":"Asia Oceania Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8742860/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Oceania Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/AOJNMB.2021.59283.1411","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Accurate detection and competent management of thyroid nodules, as a common disease, basically depends on the reliability of the ultrasonography (US) report. In this research, we evaluated inter and intra-observer variation among ultrasonography reporters, based on ACR-TIRADS.

Methods: In this retrospective study, 345 thyroid US images of 150 patients were reviewed. Three clinicians with at least 6-year experience in thyroid US reviewed the images twice at 6-8 weeks' intervals. Composition, echogenicity, shape, margin, and echogenic foci based on ACR-TIRADS were reported, independently. Inter and intra-observer variations were calculated based on Cohen's Kappa statistics.

Results: 345 ultrasonography images of 150 patients with thyroid nodules (83 women and 67 men) with a mean age of 65 years were reviewed. Moderate to the substantial intra-observer agreement was achieved with the highest Kapa value in the category of shape (k=0.61-0.77). For TIRADS level, the moderate intra-observer agreement was observed (k=0.42-0.46). Inter-observer agreement for the US category of thyroid nodules was obtained slightly to moderate. Composition (k=0.42 and 0.51) and echogenicity (k=0.45 and 0.46) showed the highest overall agreement and margin showed the lowest overall agreement (k=0.18 and 0.19). In assessing TIRADS level of nodules, a fair agreement was obtained (k=0.23 and 0.29).

Conclusion: Moderate to substantial intra-observer agreement and slight to moderate inter-observer variation for evaluation of thyroid nodules; shows the need for a computer-aided diagnosis system based on artificial intelligence to assist our physicians in differentiating thyroid nodule characteristics based on explicit image features. An additional training course based on ACR-TIRADS for physicians can be another useful recommendation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

甲状腺结节超声诊断的差异观察。
目的:甲状腺结节作为一种常见病,能否准确发现和有效处理,主要取决于超声(US)报告的可靠性。在这项研究中,我们基于ACR-TIRADS评估了超声报告者之间和观察者内部的差异。方法:对150例患者的345张甲状腺超声图像进行回顾性分析。三名具有至少6年甲状腺超声检查经验的临床医生每隔6-8周复查两次影像。基于ACR-TIRADS的组成、回声强度、形状、边缘和回声灶被独立报道。根据Cohen的Kappa统计计算观察者之间和观察者内部的变化。结果:回顾了150例甲状腺结节患者的超声图像345张,其中女性83例,男性67例,平均年龄65岁。在形状类别中,以最高的Kapa值(k=0.61-0.77)实现了中度至实质性的观察者内部协议。对于TIRADS水平,观察到中度的观察者间一致性(k=0.42-0.46)。美国甲状腺结节分类的观察者间一致性为轻度至中度。组成(k=0.42和0.51)和回声度(k=0.45和0.46)表现出最高的总体一致性,边缘表现出最低的总体一致性(k=0.18和0.19)。在评估结节的TIRADS水平时,获得了公平的一致性(k=0.23和0.29)。结论:对于甲状腺结节的评估,观察者内部的一致性中等至实质性,观察者之间的差异轻微至中度;显示了基于人工智能的计算机辅助诊断系统的需求,以帮助我们的医生根据明确的图像特征区分甲状腺结节的特征。对医生进行基于ACR-TIRADS的额外培训课程可能是另一个有用的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asia Oceania Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Biology
Asia Oceania Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Biology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信