Impedance-based Real-time Monitoring of Neural Stem Cell Differentiation.

Q3 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Journal of Electrical Bioimpedance Pub Date : 2021-11-20 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.2478/joeb-2021-0006
F J Shah, C Caviglia, K Zór, M Carminati, G Ferrari, M Sampietro, A Martínez-Serrano, J K Emnéus, A R Heiskanen
{"title":"Impedance-based Real-time Monitoring of Neural Stem Cell Differentiation.","authors":"F J Shah,&nbsp;C Caviglia,&nbsp;K Zór,&nbsp;M Carminati,&nbsp;G Ferrari,&nbsp;M Sampietro,&nbsp;A Martínez-Serrano,&nbsp;J K Emnéus,&nbsp;A R Heiskanen","doi":"10.2478/joeb-2021-0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We present here the first impedance-based characterization of the differentiation process of two human mesencephalic fetal neural stem lines. The two dopaminergic neural stem cell lines used in this study, Lund human mesencephalic (LUHMES) and human ventral mesencephalic (hVM1 Bcl-X<sub>L</sub>), have been developed for the study of Parkinsonian pathogenesis and its treatment using cell replacement therapy. We show that if only relying on impedance magnitude analysis, which is by far the most usual approach in, e.g., cytotoxicity evaluation and drug screening applications, one may not be able to distinguish whether the neural stem cells in a population are proliferating or differentiating. However, the presented results highlight that equivalent circuit analysis can provide detailed information on cellular behavior, e.g. simultaneous changes in cell morphology, cell-cell contacts, and cell adhesion during formation of neural projections, which are the fundamental behavioral differences between proliferating and differentiating neural stem cells. Moreover, our work also demonstrates the sensitivity of impedance-based monitoring with capability to provide information on changes in cellular behavior in relation to proliferation and differentiation. For both of the studied cell lines, in already two days (one day after induction of differentiation) equivalent circuit analysis was able to show distinction between proliferation and differentiation conditions, which is significantly earlier than by microscopic imaging. This study demonstrates the potential of impedance-based monitoring as a technique of choice in the study of stem cell behavior, laying the foundation for screening assays to characterize stem cell lines and testing the efficacy epigenetic control.</p>","PeriodicalId":38125,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Electrical Bioimpedance","volume":"12 1","pages":"34-49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8667812/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Electrical Bioimpedance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/joeb-2021-0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We present here the first impedance-based characterization of the differentiation process of two human mesencephalic fetal neural stem lines. The two dopaminergic neural stem cell lines used in this study, Lund human mesencephalic (LUHMES) and human ventral mesencephalic (hVM1 Bcl-XL), have been developed for the study of Parkinsonian pathogenesis and its treatment using cell replacement therapy. We show that if only relying on impedance magnitude analysis, which is by far the most usual approach in, e.g., cytotoxicity evaluation and drug screening applications, one may not be able to distinguish whether the neural stem cells in a population are proliferating or differentiating. However, the presented results highlight that equivalent circuit analysis can provide detailed information on cellular behavior, e.g. simultaneous changes in cell morphology, cell-cell contacts, and cell adhesion during formation of neural projections, which are the fundamental behavioral differences between proliferating and differentiating neural stem cells. Moreover, our work also demonstrates the sensitivity of impedance-based monitoring with capability to provide information on changes in cellular behavior in relation to proliferation and differentiation. For both of the studied cell lines, in already two days (one day after induction of differentiation) equivalent circuit analysis was able to show distinction between proliferation and differentiation conditions, which is significantly earlier than by microscopic imaging. This study demonstrates the potential of impedance-based monitoring as a technique of choice in the study of stem cell behavior, laying the foundation for screening assays to characterize stem cell lines and testing the efficacy epigenetic control.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

基于阻抗的神经干细胞分化实时监测。
我们在这里提出了两个人类中脑胎儿神经干系分化过程的第一个基于阻抗的表征。本研究中使用的两种多巴胺能神经干细胞系Lund human mesencephalic (LUHMES)和human腹侧mesencephalic (hVM1 Bcl-XL)已被开发用于研究帕金森病的发病机制及其使用细胞替代疗法的治疗。我们表明,如果只依赖阻抗大小分析,这是迄今为止最常用的方法,例如,细胞毒性评估和药物筛选应用,人们可能无法区分群体中的神经干细胞是增殖还是分化。然而,目前的研究结果强调等效电路分析可以提供细胞行为的详细信息,例如在神经投射形成过程中细胞形态、细胞间接触和细胞粘附的同时变化,这是增殖和分化神经干细胞之间的基本行为差异。此外,我们的工作还证明了基于阻抗的监测的敏感性,能够提供与增殖和分化相关的细胞行为变化的信息。对于两种被研究的细胞系,等效电路分析已经在两天(诱导分化后一天)就能够显示增殖和分化条件之间的区别,这明显早于显微镜成像。这项研究表明,基于阻抗的监测作为干细胞行为研究的一种选择技术的潜力,为干细胞系的筛选分析和表观遗传控制的有效性测试奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Electrical Bioimpedance
Journal of Electrical Bioimpedance Engineering-Biomedical Engineering
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信