AYUSH-64 as an add-on to standard care in asymptomatic and mild cases of COVID-19: A randomized controlled trial.

Ayu Pub Date : 2020-04-01 Epub Date: 2021-10-23 DOI:10.4103/ayu.ayu_14_21
R Govind Reddy, Rajesh Vithal Gosavi, Babita Yadav, Amit Kumar Rai, Madhuri Prashant Holay, Manisha Talekar, Sophia Jameela, Bhagwan Sahay Sharma, Shruti Khanduri, Rakesh Rana, Arunabh Tripathi, Bhogavalli Chandrasekhararao, Narayanam Srikanth, Kartar S Dhiman
{"title":"AYUSH-64 as an add-on to standard care in asymptomatic and mild cases of COVID-19: A randomized controlled trial.","authors":"R Govind Reddy,&nbsp;Rajesh Vithal Gosavi,&nbsp;Babita Yadav,&nbsp;Amit Kumar Rai,&nbsp;Madhuri Prashant Holay,&nbsp;Manisha Talekar,&nbsp;Sophia Jameela,&nbsp;Bhagwan Sahay Sharma,&nbsp;Shruti Khanduri,&nbsp;Rakesh Rana,&nbsp;Arunabh Tripathi,&nbsp;Bhogavalli Chandrasekhararao,&nbsp;Narayanam Srikanth,&nbsp;Kartar S Dhiman","doi":"10.4103/ayu.ayu_14_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The evidence on the efficacy and safety of Ayurveda interventions as an add-on to the standard conventional care for coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) is limited.</p><p><strong>Aim and objective: </strong>This study was planned to explore the potential of AYUSH-64 as an add-on to conventional care in improving the clinical recovery and negative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) conversion in asymptomatic and mild COVID-19 cases.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An open-label randomized controlled study was conducted at Government Medical College, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India, with a sample size of 60 participants. In this study, asymptomatic or mild COVID-19 patients were randomized and allocated into intervention and control groups (CG) in a 1:1 ratio. AYUSH-64 two capsules (500 mg each) were administered thrice daily, after food with water for 30 days along with standard care in the intervention group (IG), while the CG received only standard care. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants who turned RT-PCR negative for COVID-19 at 7<sup>th</sup>, 15<sup>th</sup>, 22<sup>nd</sup> and 30<sup>th</sup> days. Secondary outcomes were the proportion of participants who attained clinical recovery at 7<sup>th</sup>, 15<sup>th</sup>, 22<sup>nd</sup> and 30<sup>th</sup> days, change in laboratory parameters on the 30<sup>th</sup> day and incidence of adverse drug reactions/adverse events. The data were compared within group using paired sample <i>t</i>-test/Wilcoxon signed-rank test and between group using independent sample <i>t</i>-test/Mann-Whitney test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Statistically significant difference was not observed in the proportion of participants who turned RT-PCR negative during each of the follow-ups (<i>P</i> = 0.134) and both groups demonstrated comparable efficacy. The clinical recovery in terms of complete relief in symptoms in the symptomatic participants was 60% and 37% on day 15 (<i>P</i> = 0.098) and 100% and 85.2% on day 30 (<i>P</i> = 0.112) in the intervention and CG, respectively. The improvement in the inflammatory markers such as interleukin (IL)-6, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and D-dimer was statistically significant (<i>P</i> < 0.05) in the IG, whereas in the CG, it was statistically significant for D-dimer only. None of the participants developed any complications nor were any significant ADR/AE observed in the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with asymptomatic and mild COVID-19, AYUSH-64, as add-on to standard conventional care, contributed to improved clinical recovery and demonstrated potential in reducing the levels of pro-inflammatory markers such as IL-6 and TNF-α. Further, both the groups demonstrated comparable efficacy regarding negative RT-PCR for COVID-19.</p>","PeriodicalId":8720,"journal":{"name":"Ayu","volume":"41 2","pages":"107-116"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/46/93/AYU-41-107.PMC8614205.pdf","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ayu","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ayu.ayu_14_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/10/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Background: The evidence on the efficacy and safety of Ayurveda interventions as an add-on to the standard conventional care for coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) is limited.

Aim and objective: This study was planned to explore the potential of AYUSH-64 as an add-on to conventional care in improving the clinical recovery and negative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) conversion in asymptomatic and mild COVID-19 cases.

Materials and methods: An open-label randomized controlled study was conducted at Government Medical College, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India, with a sample size of 60 participants. In this study, asymptomatic or mild COVID-19 patients were randomized and allocated into intervention and control groups (CG) in a 1:1 ratio. AYUSH-64 two capsules (500 mg each) were administered thrice daily, after food with water for 30 days along with standard care in the intervention group (IG), while the CG received only standard care. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants who turned RT-PCR negative for COVID-19 at 7th, 15th, 22nd and 30th days. Secondary outcomes were the proportion of participants who attained clinical recovery at 7th, 15th, 22nd and 30th days, change in laboratory parameters on the 30th day and incidence of adverse drug reactions/adverse events. The data were compared within group using paired sample t-test/Wilcoxon signed-rank test and between group using independent sample t-test/Mann-Whitney test.

Results: Statistically significant difference was not observed in the proportion of participants who turned RT-PCR negative during each of the follow-ups (P = 0.134) and both groups demonstrated comparable efficacy. The clinical recovery in terms of complete relief in symptoms in the symptomatic participants was 60% and 37% on day 15 (P = 0.098) and 100% and 85.2% on day 30 (P = 0.112) in the intervention and CG, respectively. The improvement in the inflammatory markers such as interleukin (IL)-6, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and D-dimer was statistically significant (P < 0.05) in the IG, whereas in the CG, it was statistically significant for D-dimer only. None of the participants developed any complications nor were any significant ADR/AE observed in the groups.

Conclusions: In patients with asymptomatic and mild COVID-19, AYUSH-64, as add-on to standard conventional care, contributed to improved clinical recovery and demonstrated potential in reducing the levels of pro-inflammatory markers such as IL-6 and TNF-α. Further, both the groups demonstrated comparable efficacy regarding negative RT-PCR for COVID-19.

Abstract Image

AYUSH-64作为无症状和轻度COVID-19病例标准治疗的补充:一项随机对照试验
背景:阿育吠陀干预措施作为冠状病毒病-2019 (COVID-19)标准常规护理的补充措施的有效性和安全性证据有限。目的和目的:本研究旨在探讨AYUSH-64作为常规治疗的补充药物在改善无症状和轻度COVID-19患者的临床康复和逆转录-聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)阴性转化方面的潜力。材料和方法:在印度马哈拉施特拉邦那格浦尔政府医学院进行了一项开放标签随机对照研究,样本量为60名参与者。本研究将无症状或轻度COVID-19患者随机分为干预组和对照组(CG),比例为1:1。干预组(IG)给予AYUSH-64两粒胶囊(每粒500毫克),每天三次,在食物加水后给予30天,同时给予标准治疗,而CG组只接受标准治疗。主要结果是在第7天、第15天、第22天和第30天COVID-19 RT-PCR阴性的参与者比例。次要结局为第7、15、22、30天临床康复的比例,第30天实验室参数的变化,药物不良反应/不良事件的发生率。组内比较采用配对样本t检验/Wilcoxon符号秩检验,组间比较采用独立样本t检验/Mann-Whitney检验。结果:每次随访时,RT-PCR阴性的参与者比例无统计学差异(P = 0.134),两组疗效相当。干预组和CG组的临床症状完全缓解率在第15天分别为60%和37% (P = 0.098),在第30天分别为100%和85.2% (P = 0.112)。IG组炎症标志物如白细胞介素(IL)-6、肿瘤坏死因子-α (TNF-α)和d -二聚体的改善有统计学意义(P < 0.05),而CG组仅d -二聚体有统计学意义。所有参与者均未出现任何并发症,也未观察到任何显著的ADR/AE。结论:在无症状和轻度COVID-19患者中,AYUSH-64作为标准常规护理的补充,有助于改善临床恢复,并显示出降低IL-6和TNF-α等促炎标志物水平的潜力。此外,两组对COVID-19的RT-PCR阴性均表现出相当的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ayu
Ayu
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信