{"title":"Placement accuracy of the second electrode in bilateral deep brain stimulation surgery.","authors":"Krishnapundha Bunyaratavej, Onanong Phokaewvarangkul, Piyanat Wangsawatwong","doi":"10.1080/02688697.2021.2019677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Due to brain shift during bilateral deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery, placement of the second electrode may be subjected to more error than that of the first electrode. The authors aimed to investigate the accuracy of second electrode placement in this setting.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Fifty-five patients with Parkinson's disease who underwent bilateral DBS surgery (110 electrodes) were retrospectively evaluated. The targets were subthalamic nucleus (STN) and globus pallidus interna (GPi) in 40 and 15 cases, respectively. Preoperative planning and postoperative electrode images were co-registered to compare the error margin between the two sides.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There is a statistically significant difference in the directional axis error along the <i>y</i> axis only when comparing each laterality (posterior 0.04 ± 1.21 mm vs anterior 0.41 ± 1.07 mm, <i>p</i> = 0.006). There is no significant difference of other error parameters, final track location, and number of microelectrode recording passes between the two sides. In a subgroup analysis, there is a significant difference in directional axis error along the <i>y</i> axis only in the STN subgroup (posterior 0.40 ± 1.05 mm vs anterior 0.18 ± 1.04 mm, <i>p</i> = 0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although a statistically significant difference in directional axis error along the <i>y</i> axis was found between first and second electrode placements in the STN group but not in the GPi group, its magnitude is well below the clinically significant threshold.</p>","PeriodicalId":9261,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Neurosurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02688697.2021.2019677","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/12/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Due to brain shift during bilateral deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery, placement of the second electrode may be subjected to more error than that of the first electrode. The authors aimed to investigate the accuracy of second electrode placement in this setting.
Materials and methods: Fifty-five patients with Parkinson's disease who underwent bilateral DBS surgery (110 electrodes) were retrospectively evaluated. The targets were subthalamic nucleus (STN) and globus pallidus interna (GPi) in 40 and 15 cases, respectively. Preoperative planning and postoperative electrode images were co-registered to compare the error margin between the two sides.
Results: There is a statistically significant difference in the directional axis error along the y axis only when comparing each laterality (posterior 0.04 ± 1.21 mm vs anterior 0.41 ± 1.07 mm, p = 0.006). There is no significant difference of other error parameters, final track location, and number of microelectrode recording passes between the two sides. In a subgroup analysis, there is a significant difference in directional axis error along the y axis only in the STN subgroup (posterior 0.40 ± 1.05 mm vs anterior 0.18 ± 1.04 mm, p = 0.003).
Conclusion: Although a statistically significant difference in directional axis error along the y axis was found between first and second electrode placements in the STN group but not in the GPi group, its magnitude is well below the clinically significant threshold.
期刊介绍:
The British Journal of Neurosurgery is a leading international forum for debate in the field of neurosurgery, publishing original peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality, along with comment and correspondence on all topics of current interest to neurosurgeons worldwide.
Coverage includes all aspects of case assessment and surgical practice, as well as wide-ranging research, with an emphasis on clinical rather than experimental material. Special emphasis is placed on postgraduate education with review articles on basic neurosciences and on the theory behind advances in techniques, investigation and clinical management. All papers are submitted to rigorous and independent peer-review, ensuring the journal’s wide citation and its appearance in the major abstracting and indexing services.