Predicting persistence of hallucinations from childhood to adolescence.

Lisa R Steenkamp, Henning Tiemeier, Laura M E Blanken, Manon H J Hillegers, Steven A Kushner, Koen Bolhuis
{"title":"Predicting persistence of hallucinations from childhood to adolescence.","authors":"Lisa R Steenkamp,&nbsp;Henning Tiemeier,&nbsp;Laura M E Blanken,&nbsp;Manon H J Hillegers,&nbsp;Steven A Kushner,&nbsp;Koen Bolhuis","doi":"10.1192/bjp.2021.115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Psychotic experiences predict adverse health outcomes, particularly if they are persistent. However, it is unclear what distinguishes persistent from transient psychotic experiences.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>In a large population-based cohort, we aimed to (a) describe the course of hallucinatory experiences from childhood to adolescence, (b) compare characteristics of youth with persistent and remittent hallucinatory experiences, and (c) examine prediction models for persistence.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Youth were assessed longitudinally for hallucinatory experiences at mean ages of 10 and 14 years (n = 3473). Multi-informant-rated mental health problems, stressful life events, self-esteem, non-verbal IQ and parental psychopathology were examined in relation to absent, persistent, remittent and incident hallucinatory experiences. We evaluated two prediction models for persistence with logistic regression and assessed discrimination using the area under the curve (AUC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The persistence rate of hallucinatory experiences was 20.5%. Adolescents with persistent hallucinatory experiences had higher baseline levels of hallucinatory experiences, emotional and behavioural problems, as well as lower self-esteem and non-verbal IQ scores than youth with remittent hallucinatory experiences. Although the prediction model for persistence versus absence of hallucinatory experiences demonstrated excellent discriminatory power (AUC-corrected = 0.80), the prediction model for persistence versus remittance demonstrated poor accuracy (AUC-corrected = 0.61).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides support for the dynamic expression of childhood hallucinatory experiences and suggests increased neurodevelopmental vulnerability in youth with persistent hallucinatory experiences. Despite the inclusion of a wide array of psychosocial parameters, a prediction model discriminated poorly between youth with persistent versus remittent hallucinatory experiences, confirming that persistent hallucinatory experiences are a complex multifactorial trait.</p>","PeriodicalId":520791,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science","volume":" ","pages":"670-677"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8674728/pdf/","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2021.115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Background: Psychotic experiences predict adverse health outcomes, particularly if they are persistent. However, it is unclear what distinguishes persistent from transient psychotic experiences.

Aims: In a large population-based cohort, we aimed to (a) describe the course of hallucinatory experiences from childhood to adolescence, (b) compare characteristics of youth with persistent and remittent hallucinatory experiences, and (c) examine prediction models for persistence.

Method: Youth were assessed longitudinally for hallucinatory experiences at mean ages of 10 and 14 years (n = 3473). Multi-informant-rated mental health problems, stressful life events, self-esteem, non-verbal IQ and parental psychopathology were examined in relation to absent, persistent, remittent and incident hallucinatory experiences. We evaluated two prediction models for persistence with logistic regression and assessed discrimination using the area under the curve (AUC).

Results: The persistence rate of hallucinatory experiences was 20.5%. Adolescents with persistent hallucinatory experiences had higher baseline levels of hallucinatory experiences, emotional and behavioural problems, as well as lower self-esteem and non-verbal IQ scores than youth with remittent hallucinatory experiences. Although the prediction model for persistence versus absence of hallucinatory experiences demonstrated excellent discriminatory power (AUC-corrected = 0.80), the prediction model for persistence versus remittance demonstrated poor accuracy (AUC-corrected = 0.61).

Conclusions: This study provides support for the dynamic expression of childhood hallucinatory experiences and suggests increased neurodevelopmental vulnerability in youth with persistent hallucinatory experiences. Despite the inclusion of a wide array of psychosocial parameters, a prediction model discriminated poorly between youth with persistent versus remittent hallucinatory experiences, confirming that persistent hallucinatory experiences are a complex multifactorial trait.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

预测幻觉从童年持续到青春期。
背景:精神病经历预示着不良的健康结果,特别是如果它们是持续的。然而,目前还不清楚是什么区分了持续的和短暂的精神症状。目的:在一个以人群为基础的大队列中,我们的目的是(a)描述从童年到青春期的幻觉经历的过程,(b)比较持续和缓解幻觉经历的青少年的特征,以及(c)检验持久性的预测模型。方法:对平均年龄为10岁和14岁的青少年进行幻觉经历的纵向评估(n = 3473)。对多被调查者评定的心理健康问题、压力生活事件、自尊、非语言智商和父母精神病理与缺席、持续、缓解和偶发幻觉经历的关系进行了检查。我们用逻辑回归评估了两种预测模型的持久性,并使用曲线下面积(AUC)评估了歧视。结果:幻觉体验持续率为20.5%。与持续性幻觉经历的青少年相比,持续性幻觉经历的青少年在幻觉经历、情绪和行为问题、自尊和非语言智商得分方面的基线水平更高。尽管持续与不存在幻觉体验的预测模型显示出出色的区分能力(auc校正= 0.80),但持续与汇款的预测模型显示出较差的准确性(auc校正= 0.61)。结论:本研究为儿童幻觉经历的动态表达提供了支持,并提示持续幻觉经历的青少年神经发育脆弱性增加。尽管包含了一系列广泛的社会心理参数,但预测模型在持续幻觉经历和缓解幻觉经历的青少年之间的区分很差,证实了持续幻觉经历是一个复杂的多因素特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信