Sophie J Baker, Mike Jackson, Hannah Jongsma, Christopher W N Saville
{"title":"The ethnic density effect in psychosis: a systematic review and multilevel meta-analysis.","authors":"Sophie J Baker, Mike Jackson, Hannah Jongsma, Christopher W N Saville","doi":"10.1192/bjp.2021.96","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An 'ethnic' or 'group' density effect in psychosis has been observed, whereby the risk of psychosis in minority group individuals is inversely related to neighbourhood-level proportions of others belonging to the same group. However, there is conflicting evidence over whether this effect differs between minority groups and limited investigation into other moderators.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To conduct a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of the group density effect in psychosis and examine moderators.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Four databases were systematically searched. A narrative review was conducted and a three-level meta-analysis was performed. The potential moderating effect of crudely and specifically defined minority groups was assessed. Country, time, area size and whether studies used clinical or non-clinical outcomes were also tested as moderators.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-two studies were included in the narrative review and ten in the meta-analysis. A 10 percentage-point decrease in own-group density was associated with a 20% increase in psychosis risk (OR = 1.20, 95% CI 1.09-1.32, P < 0.001). This was moderated by crudely defined minority groups (F6,68 = 6.86, P < 0.001), with the strongest associations observed in Black populations, followed by a White Other sample. Greater heterogeneity was observed when specific minority groups were assessed (F25,49 = 7.26, P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first review to provide meta-analytic evidence that the risk of psychosis posed by lower own-group density varies across minority groups, with the strongest associations observed in Black individuals. Heterogeneity in effect sizes may reflect distinctive social experiences of specific minority groups. Potential mechanisms are discussed, along with the implications of findings and suggestions for future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":520791,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science","volume":" ","pages":"632-643"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8636614/pdf/","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2021.96","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18
Abstract
Background: An 'ethnic' or 'group' density effect in psychosis has been observed, whereby the risk of psychosis in minority group individuals is inversely related to neighbourhood-level proportions of others belonging to the same group. However, there is conflicting evidence over whether this effect differs between minority groups and limited investigation into other moderators.
Aims: To conduct a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of the group density effect in psychosis and examine moderators.
Method: Four databases were systematically searched. A narrative review was conducted and a three-level meta-analysis was performed. The potential moderating effect of crudely and specifically defined minority groups was assessed. Country, time, area size and whether studies used clinical or non-clinical outcomes were also tested as moderators.
Results: Thirty-two studies were included in the narrative review and ten in the meta-analysis. A 10 percentage-point decrease in own-group density was associated with a 20% increase in psychosis risk (OR = 1.20, 95% CI 1.09-1.32, P < 0.001). This was moderated by crudely defined minority groups (F6,68 = 6.86, P < 0.001), with the strongest associations observed in Black populations, followed by a White Other sample. Greater heterogeneity was observed when specific minority groups were assessed (F25,49 = 7.26, P < 0.001).
Conclusions: This is the first review to provide meta-analytic evidence that the risk of psychosis posed by lower own-group density varies across minority groups, with the strongest associations observed in Black individuals. Heterogeneity in effect sizes may reflect distinctive social experiences of specific minority groups. Potential mechanisms are discussed, along with the implications of findings and suggestions for future research.
背景:已经观察到精神病的“种族”或“群体”密度效应,即少数群体个体的精神病风险与属于同一群体的其他人的社区水平比例呈负相关。然而,关于这种效应在少数群体之间是否不同以及对其他调节因子的有限调查存在矛盾的证据。目的:对精神病患者群体密度效应进行全面的系统回顾和荟萃分析,并检查调节因子。方法:系统检索4个数据库。进行叙述性回顾,并进行三级元分析。评估了粗略和具体定义的少数群体的潜在调节作用。国家、时间、面积大小以及研究是否使用临床或非临床结果也作为调节因素进行了测试。结果:32项研究被纳入叙述性综述,10项研究被纳入meta分析。自组密度降低10个百分点与精神病风险增加20%相关(OR = 1.20, 95% CI 1.09-1.32, P < 0.001)。这被粗略定义的少数群体所缓和(F6,68 = 6.86, P < 0.001),在黑人群体中观察到最强的关联,其次是白人其他样本。当评估特定的少数群体时,观察到更大的异质性(F25,49 = 7.26, P < 0.001)。结论:这是第一个提供荟萃分析证据的综述,表明低本群体密度引起的精神病风险在少数群体中有所不同,在黑人个体中观察到最强的关联。效应大小的异质性可能反映了特定少数群体的独特社会经验。讨论了潜在的机制,以及研究结果的含义和对未来研究的建议。