Latent Semantic Structure of the WMS-III Verbal Paired-Associates.

Rachel T Furey, Vilija Petrauskas, Stephen C Bowden, Leonie C Simpson, Catherine E Meade, Brooke M Davis, Wendyl J D'Souza
{"title":"Latent Semantic Structure of the WMS-III Verbal Paired-Associates.","authors":"Rachel T Furey,&nbsp;Vilija Petrauskas,&nbsp;Stephen C Bowden,&nbsp;Leonie C Simpson,&nbsp;Catherine E Meade,&nbsp;Brooke M Davis,&nbsp;Wendyl J D'Souza","doi":"10.1093/arclin/acab093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the factor structure of the verbal paired-associates (VPA) subtest in the WMS-III using a theoretically driven model of semantic processing previously found to be well-fitting for the WMS-IV version of the test.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Archival data were used from 267 heterogeneous neurosciences patients and 223 seizure disorder patients who completed the WMS-III as part of a standard neuropsychological evaluation. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to test theoretically driven models for VPA based on principles of semantic processing. Four nested models of different complexities were examined and compared for goodness-of-fit using chi-squared difference testing. Measurement invariance testing was conducted across heterogeneous neuroscience and seizure disorder samples to test generality of the factor model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After removing items with limited variability (very easy or very hard; 12 of 40 items), a four-factor model was found to be best-fitting in the present patient samples. The four factors were \"recreational\", \"functional\", \"material\", and \"symbolic\", each representing semantic knowledge associated with the function of the target word referent. This model subsequently met the criteria for the strict measurement invariance, showing good overall fit when factor loadings, thresholds, and residuals were held to equality across samples.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this study provide further evidence that \"arbitrary\" associations between word pairs in VPA items have an underlying semantic structure, challenging the idea that unrelated hard-pairs are semantic-free. These results suggest that a semantic-structure model may be implemented as an alternative scoring in future editions of the WMS to facilitate interpretation.</p>","PeriodicalId":520564,"journal":{"name":"Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists","volume":" ","pages":"970-980"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acab093","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the factor structure of the verbal paired-associates (VPA) subtest in the WMS-III using a theoretically driven model of semantic processing previously found to be well-fitting for the WMS-IV version of the test.

Method: Archival data were used from 267 heterogeneous neurosciences patients and 223 seizure disorder patients who completed the WMS-III as part of a standard neuropsychological evaluation. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to test theoretically driven models for VPA based on principles of semantic processing. Four nested models of different complexities were examined and compared for goodness-of-fit using chi-squared difference testing. Measurement invariance testing was conducted across heterogeneous neuroscience and seizure disorder samples to test generality of the factor model.

Results: After removing items with limited variability (very easy or very hard; 12 of 40 items), a four-factor model was found to be best-fitting in the present patient samples. The four factors were "recreational", "functional", "material", and "symbolic", each representing semantic knowledge associated with the function of the target word referent. This model subsequently met the criteria for the strict measurement invariance, showing good overall fit when factor loadings, thresholds, and residuals were held to equality across samples.

Conclusions: The results of this study provide further evidence that "arbitrary" associations between word pairs in VPA items have an underlying semantic structure, challenging the idea that unrelated hard-pairs are semantic-free. These results suggest that a semantic-structure model may be implemented as an alternative scoring in future editions of the WMS to facilitate interpretation.

WMS-III词汇配对联想的潜在语义结构
目的:利用一种理论驱动的语义加工模型,研究WMS-III中言语配对联想(VPA)子测试的因素结构,该模型先前被发现非常适合于WMS-IV版本的测试。方法:档案资料来自267名异质神经科学患者和223名癫痫患者,他们完成了WMS-III作为标准神经心理学评估的一部分。采用验证性因子分析对基于语义处理原理的VPA理论驱动模型进行检验。使用卡方差异检验对四个不同复杂性的嵌套模型进行检验并比较拟合优度。测量不变性检验进行跨异质神经科学和癫痫发作障碍的样本,以检验因素模型的一般性。结果:变异性有限的物品(非常容易或非常困难)取出后;40项中的12项),发现四因素模型最适合目前的患者样本。这四个因素分别是“娱乐性”、“功能性”、“物质性”和“象征性”,分别代表与目标词所指功能相关的语义知识。该模型随后满足严格测量不变性的标准,当因子负载,阈值和残差在样本中保持相等时,显示出良好的整体拟合。结论:本研究结果进一步证明了VPA项目中词对之间的“任意”关联具有潜在的语义结构,挑战了不相关的硬对是无语义的观点。这些结果表明,语义结构模型可以在未来版本的WMS中作为一种替代评分方法来实现,以促进解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信