The D-Health Trial: a randomised controlled trial of the effect of vitamin D on mortality.

The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology Pub Date : 2022-02-01 Epub Date: 2022-01-10 DOI:10.1016/S2213-8587(21)00345-4
Rachel E Neale, Catherine Baxter, Briony Duarte Romero, Donald S A McLeod, Dallas R English, Bruce K Armstrong, Peter R Ebeling, Gunter Hartel, Michael G Kimlin, Rachel O'Connell, Jolieke C van der Pols, Alison J Venn, Penelope M Webb, David C Whiteman, Mary Waterhouse
{"title":"The D-Health Trial: a randomised controlled trial of the effect of vitamin D on mortality.","authors":"Rachel E Neale,&nbsp;Catherine Baxter,&nbsp;Briony Duarte Romero,&nbsp;Donald S A McLeod,&nbsp;Dallas R English,&nbsp;Bruce K Armstrong,&nbsp;Peter R Ebeling,&nbsp;Gunter Hartel,&nbsp;Michael G Kimlin,&nbsp;Rachel O'Connell,&nbsp;Jolieke C van der Pols,&nbsp;Alison J Venn,&nbsp;Penelope M Webb,&nbsp;David C Whiteman,&nbsp;Mary Waterhouse","doi":"10.1016/S2213-8587(21)00345-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The effect of supplementing unscreened adults with vitamin D<sub>3</sub> on mortality is unclear. We aimed to determine whether monthly doses of vitamin D<sub>3</sub> influenced mortality in older Australians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We did a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of oral vitamin D<sub>3</sub> supplementation (60 000 IU per month) in Australians 60 years or older who were recruited across the country via the Commonwealth electoral roll. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1), using automated computer-generated permuted block randomisation, to receive one oral gel capsule of either 60 000 IU vitamin D<sub>3</sub> or placebo once a month for 5 years. Participants, staff, and investigators were blinded to study group allocation. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality assessed in all participants who were randomly assigned. We also analysed mortality from cancer, cardiovascular disease, and other causes. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs were generated using flexible parametric survival models. This trial is registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12613000743763.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Between Feb 14, 2014, and June 17, 2015, we randomly assigned 21 315 participants, including 10 662 to the vitamin D group and 10 653 to the placebo group. In 4441 blood samples collected from randomly sampled participants (N=3943) during follow-up, mean serum 25-hydroxy-vitamin D concentrations were 77 (SD 25) in the placebo group and 115 (SD 30) nmol/L in the vitamin D group. Following 5 years of intervention (median follow-up 5·7 years [IQR 5·4-6·7]), 1100 deaths were recorded (placebo 538 [5·1%]; vitamin D 562 [5·3%]). 10 661 participants in the vitamin D group and 10 649 participants in the placebo group were included in the primary analysis. Five participants (one in the vitamin D group and four in the placebo group) were not included as they requested to be withdrawn and their data to be destroyed. The HR of vitamin D<sub>3</sub> effect on all-cause mortality was 1.04 [95% CI 0·93 to 1·18]; p=0·47)and the HR of vitamin D<sub>3</sub> effect on cardiovascular disease mortality was 0·96 (95% CI 0·72 to 1·28; p=0·77). The HR for cancer mortality was 1·15 (95% CI 0·96 to 1·39; p=0·13) and for mortality from other causes it was 0·83 (95% CI 0·65 to 1·07; p=0·15). The odds ratio for the per-protocol analysis was OR 1·18 (95% CI 1·00 to 1·40; p=0·06). In exploratory analyses excluding the first 2 years of follow-up, those randomly assigned to receive vitamin D had a numerically higher hazard of cancer mortality than those in the placebo group (HR 1·24 [95% CI 1·01-1·54]; p=0·05).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Administering vitamin D<sub>3</sub> monthly to unscreened older people did not reduce all-cause mortality. Point estimates and exploratory analyses excluding the early follow-up period were consistent with an increased risk of death from cancer. Pending further evidence, the precautionary principle would suggest that this dosing regimen might not be appropriate in people who are vitamin D-replete.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>The D-Health Trial is funded by National Health and Medical Research Council.</p>","PeriodicalId":519532,"journal":{"name":"The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology","volume":" ","pages":"120-128"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"59","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(21)00345-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 59

Abstract

Background: The effect of supplementing unscreened adults with vitamin D3 on mortality is unclear. We aimed to determine whether monthly doses of vitamin D3 influenced mortality in older Australians.

Methods: We did a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of oral vitamin D3 supplementation (60 000 IU per month) in Australians 60 years or older who were recruited across the country via the Commonwealth electoral roll. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1), using automated computer-generated permuted block randomisation, to receive one oral gel capsule of either 60 000 IU vitamin D3 or placebo once a month for 5 years. Participants, staff, and investigators were blinded to study group allocation. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality assessed in all participants who were randomly assigned. We also analysed mortality from cancer, cardiovascular disease, and other causes. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs were generated using flexible parametric survival models. This trial is registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12613000743763.

Findings: Between Feb 14, 2014, and June 17, 2015, we randomly assigned 21 315 participants, including 10 662 to the vitamin D group and 10 653 to the placebo group. In 4441 blood samples collected from randomly sampled participants (N=3943) during follow-up, mean serum 25-hydroxy-vitamin D concentrations were 77 (SD 25) in the placebo group and 115 (SD 30) nmol/L in the vitamin D group. Following 5 years of intervention (median follow-up 5·7 years [IQR 5·4-6·7]), 1100 deaths were recorded (placebo 538 [5·1%]; vitamin D 562 [5·3%]). 10 661 participants in the vitamin D group and 10 649 participants in the placebo group were included in the primary analysis. Five participants (one in the vitamin D group and four in the placebo group) were not included as they requested to be withdrawn and their data to be destroyed. The HR of vitamin D3 effect on all-cause mortality was 1.04 [95% CI 0·93 to 1·18]; p=0·47)and the HR of vitamin D3 effect on cardiovascular disease mortality was 0·96 (95% CI 0·72 to 1·28; p=0·77). The HR for cancer mortality was 1·15 (95% CI 0·96 to 1·39; p=0·13) and for mortality from other causes it was 0·83 (95% CI 0·65 to 1·07; p=0·15). The odds ratio for the per-protocol analysis was OR 1·18 (95% CI 1·00 to 1·40; p=0·06). In exploratory analyses excluding the first 2 years of follow-up, those randomly assigned to receive vitamin D had a numerically higher hazard of cancer mortality than those in the placebo group (HR 1·24 [95% CI 1·01-1·54]; p=0·05).

Interpretation: Administering vitamin D3 monthly to unscreened older people did not reduce all-cause mortality. Point estimates and exploratory analyses excluding the early follow-up period were consistent with an increased risk of death from cancer. Pending further evidence, the precautionary principle would suggest that this dosing regimen might not be appropriate in people who are vitamin D-replete.

Funding: The D-Health Trial is funded by National Health and Medical Research Council.

D-健康试验:一项维生素D对死亡率影响的随机对照试验。
背景:未筛查的成年人补充维生素D3对死亡率的影响尚不清楚。我们的目的是确定每月服用维生素D3是否会影响澳大利亚老年人的死亡率。方法:我们进行了一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的口服维生素D3补充剂试验(每月60000国际单位),试验对象为60岁或以上的澳大利亚人,他们是通过英联邦选举名册在全国招募的。参与者被随机分配(1:1),使用自动计算机生成的排列块随机化,每月一次接受60000 IU维生素D3口服凝胶胶囊或安慰剂,为期5年。参与者、工作人员和调查人员对研究组的分配不知情。主要终点是评估随机分配的所有参与者的全因死亡率。我们还分析了癌症、心血管疾病和其他原因造成的死亡率。使用灵活参数生存模型生成风险比(hr)和95% ci。该试验已在澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心注册,编号为ACTRN12613000743763。研究结果:在2014年2月14日至2015年6月17日期间,我们随机分配了21,315名参与者,其中维生素D组为10,662人,安慰剂组为10,653人。在随访期间随机抽取的4441份血样(N=3943)中,安慰剂组的平均血清25-羟基维生素D浓度为77 (SD 25),维生素D组的平均血清25-羟基维生素D浓度为115 (SD 30) nmol/L。干预5年后(中位随访5·7年[IQR 5·4-6·7]),记录了1100例死亡(安慰剂组538例[5.1%];维生素D 562[5.3%])。最初的分析包括10661名维生素D组的参与者和10649名安慰剂组的参与者。五名参与者(一名维生素D组和四名安慰剂组)没有被包括在内,因为他们要求退出研究,并销毁他们的数据。维生素D3对全因死亡率影响的HR为1.04 [95% CI 0.93 ~ 1.18];p= 0.47),维生素D3对心血管疾病死亡率影响的HR为0.96 (95% CI为0.72 ~ 1.28;p = 0·77)。癌症死亡率的HR为1.15 (95% CI为0.96 ~ 1.39;p= 0.13),其他原因的死亡率为0.83 (95% CI 0.65 ~ 1.07;p = 0·15)。每个方案分析的优势比为OR 1.18 (95% CI 1.00 ~ 1.40;p = 0·06)。在排除前2年随访的探索性分析中,随机分配接受维生素D治疗的患者的癌症死亡率高于安慰剂组(HR 1.24 [95% CI 1.01 - 1.54];p = 0·05)。解释:每月给未筛查的老年人服用维生素D3并没有降低全因死亡率。排除早期随访期的点估计和探索性分析与癌症死亡风险增加一致。在进一步的证据之前,预防原则表明,这种剂量方案可能不适合维生素d充足的人。资助:D-Health试验由国家卫生和医学研究委员会资助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信