{"title":"Methods and efficacy of social support interventions in preventing suicide: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Xiaofei Hou, Jiali Wang, Jing Guo, Xinxu Zhang, Jiahai Liu, Linmao Qi, Liang Zhou","doi":"10.1136/ebmental-2021-300318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Question: </strong>Suicide is a global public and mental health problem. The effectiveness of social support interventions has not been widely demonstrated in the prevention of suicide. We aimed to describe the methods of social support interventions in preventing suicide and examine the efficacy of them.</p><p><strong>Study selection and analysis: </strong>We searched literature databases and conducted clinical trials. The inclusion criteria for the summary of intervention methods were as follows: (1) studies aimed at preventing suicide through method(s) that directly provide social support; (2) use of one or more method(s) to directly provide social support. The additional inclusion criteria for meta-analysis on the efficacy of these interventions included: (1) suicide, suicide attempt or social support-related outcome was measured; (2) randomised controlled trial design and (3) using social support intervention as the main/only method.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>In total, 22 656 records and 185 clinical trials were identified. We reviewed 77 studies in terms of intervention methods, settings, support providers and support recipients. There was a total of 18 799 person-years among the ten studies measuring suicide. The number of suicides was significantly reduced in the intervention group (risk ratio (RR)=0.48, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.85). In 14 studies with a total of 14 469 person-years, there was no significant reduction of suicide attempts in the overall pooled RR of 0.88 (95% CI 0.73 to 1.07).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Social support interventions were recommended as a suicide prevention strategy for those with elevated suicide risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":12233,"journal":{"name":"Evidence Based Mental Health","volume":" ","pages":"29-35"},"PeriodicalIF":11.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/36/48/ebmental-2021-300318.PMC8788249.pdf","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence Based Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ebmental-2021-300318","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/12/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9
Abstract
Question: Suicide is a global public and mental health problem. The effectiveness of social support interventions has not been widely demonstrated in the prevention of suicide. We aimed to describe the methods of social support interventions in preventing suicide and examine the efficacy of them.
Study selection and analysis: We searched literature databases and conducted clinical trials. The inclusion criteria for the summary of intervention methods were as follows: (1) studies aimed at preventing suicide through method(s) that directly provide social support; (2) use of one or more method(s) to directly provide social support. The additional inclusion criteria for meta-analysis on the efficacy of these interventions included: (1) suicide, suicide attempt or social support-related outcome was measured; (2) randomised controlled trial design and (3) using social support intervention as the main/only method.
Findings: In total, 22 656 records and 185 clinical trials were identified. We reviewed 77 studies in terms of intervention methods, settings, support providers and support recipients. There was a total of 18 799 person-years among the ten studies measuring suicide. The number of suicides was significantly reduced in the intervention group (risk ratio (RR)=0.48, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.85). In 14 studies with a total of 14 469 person-years, there was no significant reduction of suicide attempts in the overall pooled RR of 0.88 (95% CI 0.73 to 1.07).
Conclusions: Social support interventions were recommended as a suicide prevention strategy for those with elevated suicide risk.
问:自杀是一个全球性的公共和精神卫生问题。社会支持干预在预防自杀方面的有效性尚未得到广泛证明。我们的目的是描述预防自杀的社会支持干预方法,并检验其有效性。研究选择与分析:检索文献数据库并进行临床试验。干预方法总结的纳入标准为:(1)通过直接提供社会支持的方法预防自杀的研究;(2)使用一种或多种方法直接提供社会支持。对这些干预措施效果进行meta分析的附加纳入标准包括:(1)测量自杀、自杀未遂或社会支持相关的结果;(2)随机对照试验设计;(3)以社会支持干预为主要/唯一方法。结果:共纳入22 656份记录和185项临床试验。我们回顾了77项关于干预方法、设置、支持提供者和支持接受者的研究。在这10项研究中,总共有18799人年自杀。干预组的自杀人数显著减少(风险比(RR)=0.48, 95% CI 0.27 ~ 0.85)。在14项共14469人年的研究中,自杀企图没有显著减少,总合并RR为0.88 (95% CI 0.73至1.07)。结论:社会支持干预被推荐为自杀风险高的自杀预防策略。
期刊介绍:
Evidence-Based Mental Health alerts clinicians to important advances in treatment, diagnosis, aetiology, prognosis, continuing education, economic evaluation and qualitative research in mental health. Published by the British Psychological Society, the Royal College of Psychiatrists and the BMJ Publishing Group the journal surveys a wide range of international medical journals applying strict criteria for the quality and validity of research. Clinicians assess the relevance of the best studies and the key details of these essential studies are presented in a succinct, informative abstract with an expert commentary on its clinical application.Evidence-Based Mental Health is a multidisciplinary, quarterly publication.