Co-creating a local environmental epidemiology study: the case of citizen science for investigating air pollution and related health risks in Barcelona, Spain.

Florence Gignac, Valeria Righi, Raül Toran, Lucía Paz Errandonea, Rodney Ortiz, Mark Nieuwenhuijsen, Javier Creus, Xavier Basagaña, Mara Balestrini
{"title":"Co-creating a local environmental epidemiology study: the case of citizen science for investigating air pollution and related health risks in Barcelona, Spain.","authors":"Florence Gignac,&nbsp;Valeria Righi,&nbsp;Raül Toran,&nbsp;Lucía Paz Errandonea,&nbsp;Rodney Ortiz,&nbsp;Mark Nieuwenhuijsen,&nbsp;Javier Creus,&nbsp;Xavier Basagaña,&nbsp;Mara Balestrini","doi":"10.1186/s12940-021-00826-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While the health risks of air pollution attract considerable attention, both scholarly and within the general population, citizens are rarely involved in environmental health research, beyond participating as data subjects. Co-created citizen science is an approach that fosters collaboration between scientists and lay people to engage the latter in all phases of research. Currently, this approach is rare in environmental epidemiology and when co-creation processes do take place, they are often not documented. This paper describes the first stages of an ongoing co-created citizen science epidemiological project in Barcelona (Spain), that included identifying topics that citizens wish to investigate as regards air pollution and health, formulating their concerns into research questions and co-designing the study protocol. This paper also reflects key trade-offs between scientific rigor and public engagement and provides suggestions to consider when applying citizen science to environmental health studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Experts created an online survey and analyzed responses with descriptive statistics and qualitative coding. A pop-up intervention was held to discuss with citizens their concerns about air pollution and health. Later on, a community meeting was organized to narrow down the research topics and list potential research questions. In an online survey, citizens were asked to vote for the research question they would like to investigate with the experts. A workshop was held to choose a study design in which citizens would like to partake to answer their preferred research question.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>According to 488 respondents from the first survey, cognitive and mental health were the main priorities of investigation. Based on the second survey, with 27% of the votes from 556 citizens, the most popular research question was, \"How does air pollution together with noise and green/blue spaces affect mental health?\". The study design selected was an observational study in which citizens provide daily repeated measures of different cognitive and mental health outcomes and relate them to the air pollution concentrations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on the co-creation activities and the results obtained, we conclude that applying citizen science in an environmental health project is valuable for researchers despite some challenges such as engaging citizens and maximizing representativity.</p>","PeriodicalId":520610,"journal":{"name":"Environmental health : a global access science source","volume":" ","pages":"11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8753829/pdf/","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental health : a global access science source","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-021-00826-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Background: While the health risks of air pollution attract considerable attention, both scholarly and within the general population, citizens are rarely involved in environmental health research, beyond participating as data subjects. Co-created citizen science is an approach that fosters collaboration between scientists and lay people to engage the latter in all phases of research. Currently, this approach is rare in environmental epidemiology and when co-creation processes do take place, they are often not documented. This paper describes the first stages of an ongoing co-created citizen science epidemiological project in Barcelona (Spain), that included identifying topics that citizens wish to investigate as regards air pollution and health, formulating their concerns into research questions and co-designing the study protocol. This paper also reflects key trade-offs between scientific rigor and public engagement and provides suggestions to consider when applying citizen science to environmental health studies.

Methods: Experts created an online survey and analyzed responses with descriptive statistics and qualitative coding. A pop-up intervention was held to discuss with citizens their concerns about air pollution and health. Later on, a community meeting was organized to narrow down the research topics and list potential research questions. In an online survey, citizens were asked to vote for the research question they would like to investigate with the experts. A workshop was held to choose a study design in which citizens would like to partake to answer their preferred research question.

Results: According to 488 respondents from the first survey, cognitive and mental health were the main priorities of investigation. Based on the second survey, with 27% of the votes from 556 citizens, the most popular research question was, "How does air pollution together with noise and green/blue spaces affect mental health?". The study design selected was an observational study in which citizens provide daily repeated measures of different cognitive and mental health outcomes and relate them to the air pollution concentrations.

Conclusions: Based on the co-creation activities and the results obtained, we conclude that applying citizen science in an environmental health project is valuable for researchers despite some challenges such as engaging citizens and maximizing representativity.

共同开展一项地方环境流行病学研究:用公民科学调查西班牙巴塞罗那的空气污染和相关健康风险的案例。
背景:虽然空气污染的健康风险在学术界和普通民众中都引起了相当大的关注,但公民很少参与环境卫生研究,只是作为数据主体参与。共同创造的公民科学是一种促进科学家和非专业人员之间的合作,使后者参与研究的所有阶段的方法。目前,这种方法在环境流行病学中很少见,当共同创造过程确实发生时,它们通常没有记录。本文描述了在巴塞罗那(西班牙)正在进行的共同创建的公民科学流行病学项目的第一阶段,其中包括确定公民希望调查的关于空气污染和健康的主题,将他们的关注纳入研究问题并共同设计研究方案。本文还反映了科学严谨性和公众参与之间的关键权衡,并提供了将公民科学应用于环境健康研究时应考虑的建议。方法:专家们创建了一个在线调查,并使用描述性统计和定性编码对反馈进行分析。政府举行了一次弹出式干预活动,与市民讨论他们对空气污染和健康的担忧。随后,组织了一次社区会议,以缩小研究主题并列出潜在的研究问题。在一项在线调查中,市民被要求为他们想要与专家一起调查的研究问题投票。举办了一个研讨会,以选择公民愿意参与的研究设计,以回答他们喜欢的研究问题。结果:根据第一次调查的488名受访者,认知和心理健康是调查的主要重点。在第二项调查中,556名市民中有27%的人投票,最受欢迎的研究问题是“空气污染、噪音和绿色/蓝色空间如何影响心理健康?”所选择的研究设计是一项观察性研究,在这项研究中,公民每天重复提供不同的认知和心理健康结果,并将其与空气污染浓度联系起来。结论:基于共同创造活动和获得的结果,我们得出结论,尽管存在一些挑战,如吸引公民和最大化代表性,但在环境健康项目中应用公民科学对研究人员来说是有价值的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信