Prevalence, Pattern, Risks Factors and Consequences of Antibiotic Resistance in COPD: A Systematic Review.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Daniel Smith, Arran Gill, Lewis Hall, Alice M Turner
{"title":"Prevalence, Pattern, Risks Factors and Consequences of Antibiotic Resistance in COPD: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Daniel Smith,&nbsp;Arran Gill,&nbsp;Lewis Hall,&nbsp;Alice M Turner","doi":"10.1080/15412555.2021.2000957","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A concern of antibiotic use in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the emergence and propagation of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). A systematic review was conducted to determine prevalence, pattern, risk factors and consequences of AMR in COPD. Bibliographic databases were searched from inception to November 2020, with no language restrictions, including studies of any design that included patients with COPD and reported prevalence and pattern of AMR. 2748 unique titles and abstracts were identified, of which 63 articles, comprising 26,387 patients, met inclusion criteria. Forty-four (69.8%) studies were performed during acute exacerbation. The median prevalence of AMR ranged from 0-100% for <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Moraxella catarrhalis, Klebsiella pneumoniae</i> and <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i>. Median resistance rates of <i>H influenzae</i> and <i>S pneumoniae</i> were lower by comparison, with maximum rates ≤40% and ≤46%, respectively, and higher for <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i>. There was a trend towards higher rates of AMR in patients with poorer lung function and greater incidence of previous antibiotic exposure and hospitalisation. The impact of AMR on mortality was unclear. Data regarding antimicrobial susceptibility testing techniques and the impact of other risk factors or consequences of AMR were variable or not reported. This is the first review to systematically unify data regarding AMR in COPD. AMR is relatively common and strategies to optimise antibiotic use could be valuable to prevent the currently under-investigated potential adverse consequences of AMR.Supplemental data for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/15412555.2021.2000957 .</p>","PeriodicalId":10704,"journal":{"name":"COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","volume":"18 6","pages":"672-682"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15412555.2021.2000957","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

A concern of antibiotic use in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the emergence and propagation of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). A systematic review was conducted to determine prevalence, pattern, risk factors and consequences of AMR in COPD. Bibliographic databases were searched from inception to November 2020, with no language restrictions, including studies of any design that included patients with COPD and reported prevalence and pattern of AMR. 2748 unique titles and abstracts were identified, of which 63 articles, comprising 26,387 patients, met inclusion criteria. Forty-four (69.8%) studies were performed during acute exacerbation. The median prevalence of AMR ranged from 0-100% for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Moraxella catarrhalis, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Acinetobacter baumannii. Median resistance rates of H influenzae and S pneumoniae were lower by comparison, with maximum rates ≤40% and ≤46%, respectively, and higher for Staphylococcus aureus. There was a trend towards higher rates of AMR in patients with poorer lung function and greater incidence of previous antibiotic exposure and hospitalisation. The impact of AMR on mortality was unclear. Data regarding antimicrobial susceptibility testing techniques and the impact of other risk factors or consequences of AMR were variable or not reported. This is the first review to systematically unify data regarding AMR in COPD. AMR is relatively common and strategies to optimise antibiotic use could be valuable to prevent the currently under-investigated potential adverse consequences of AMR.Supplemental data for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/15412555.2021.2000957 .

慢性阻塞性肺病的患病率、模式、危险因素和抗生素耐药性的后果:一项系统综述。
慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)中抗生素使用的一个问题是抗菌素耐药性(AMR)的出现和传播。进行了一项系统综述,以确定慢性阻塞性肺病患者AMR的患病率、模式、危险因素和后果。从成立到2020年11月检索文献数据库,没有语言限制,包括包括COPD患者和报告的AMR患病率和模式的任何设计的研究。2748个独特的标题和摘要被确定,其中63篇文章,包括26387名患者,符合纳入标准。44项(69.8%)研究在急性加重期进行。铜绿假单胞菌、卡他莫拉菌、肺炎克雷伯菌和鲍曼不动杆菌的中位AMR患病率为0-100%。相比之下,流感嗜血杆菌和肺炎链球菌的中位耐药率较低,最大耐药率分别≤40%和≤46%,而金黄色葡萄球菌的耐药率较高。肺功能较差、既往抗生素暴露和住院发生率较高的患者有较高的AMR发生率的趋势。抗菌素耐药性对死亡率的影响尚不清楚。有关抗菌素敏感性试验技术和其他风险因素或抗菌素耐药性后果的影响的数据是可变的或未报告的。这是第一个系统地统一COPD中AMR数据的综述。抗菌素耐药性相对普遍,优化抗生素使用的策略对于预防目前尚未充分研究的抗菌素耐药性潜在不良后果可能很有价值。本文的补充数据可在https://doi.org/10.1080/15412555.2021.2000957上在线获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: From pathophysiology and cell biology to pharmacology and psychosocial impact, COPD: Journal Of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease publishes a wide range of original research, reviews, case studies, and conference proceedings to promote advances in the pathophysiology, diagnosis, management, and control of lung and airway disease and inflammation - providing a unique forum for the discussion, design, and evaluation of more efficient and effective strategies in patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信