[Dual or triple combination antiretrovirals?]

Q3 Medicine
Petr Husa, Svatava Snopková
{"title":"[Dual or triple combination antiretrovirals?]","authors":"Petr Husa,&nbsp;Svatava Snopková","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since the beginning of the antiretroviral therapy (ART) era, its extraordinary effect in terms of morbidity and mortality has been linked to a three-drug combination HIV treatment strategy, which has been perceived as a constant paradigm for many years. However, epidemiological studies over the past decade have clearly shown that ART does not result in complete normalization of all biomarkers, and some degree of systemic immune activation and inflammation, including endothelial dysfunction, persist. It is generally accepted that these pathophysiological processes are the cause of non-AIDS diseases, which are clinically manifested in people living with HIV on average 10 years earlier than in the general HIV-negative population. HIV treatment is not eradicative but only inhibitive and requires regular daily medication. This increases the risk of the cumulative impact of side effects and drug toxicity. In addition, it is expected that there will be a significant increase in the number of patients with various other non-AIDS comorbidities that will require multiple medication in the coming years. In particular, the higher genetic barrier of the new generation of drugs and an improved safety profile have raised the question of the effectiveness of two-drug combination regimens with the fundamental goal of reducing the burden on the human body by different drugs while maintaining high efficacy fully comparable to the current three-drug combination strategy. However, the question of whether dual combination regimens can sufficiently suppress the persistence of chronic inflammation and immune activation remains unanswered. To answer such a question, robust data from large prospective randomized studies are needed, which are still lacking. This review discusses the principle of systemic immune activation, its regenerative potential in ART, the expected causes leading to systemic immune activation, intervention options to influence it, as well as the limitations of studies to date.</p>","PeriodicalId":17909,"journal":{"name":"Klinicka mikrobiologie a infekcni lekarstvi","volume":"27 3","pages":"116-123"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Klinicka mikrobiologie a infekcni lekarstvi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since the beginning of the antiretroviral therapy (ART) era, its extraordinary effect in terms of morbidity and mortality has been linked to a three-drug combination HIV treatment strategy, which has been perceived as a constant paradigm for many years. However, epidemiological studies over the past decade have clearly shown that ART does not result in complete normalization of all biomarkers, and some degree of systemic immune activation and inflammation, including endothelial dysfunction, persist. It is generally accepted that these pathophysiological processes are the cause of non-AIDS diseases, which are clinically manifested in people living with HIV on average 10 years earlier than in the general HIV-negative population. HIV treatment is not eradicative but only inhibitive and requires regular daily medication. This increases the risk of the cumulative impact of side effects and drug toxicity. In addition, it is expected that there will be a significant increase in the number of patients with various other non-AIDS comorbidities that will require multiple medication in the coming years. In particular, the higher genetic barrier of the new generation of drugs and an improved safety profile have raised the question of the effectiveness of two-drug combination regimens with the fundamental goal of reducing the burden on the human body by different drugs while maintaining high efficacy fully comparable to the current three-drug combination strategy. However, the question of whether dual combination regimens can sufficiently suppress the persistence of chronic inflammation and immune activation remains unanswered. To answer such a question, robust data from large prospective randomized studies are needed, which are still lacking. This review discusses the principle of systemic immune activation, its regenerative potential in ART, the expected causes leading to systemic immune activation, intervention options to influence it, as well as the limitations of studies to date.

[双重或三重联合抗逆转录病毒药物?]
自抗逆转录病毒疗法(ART)时代开始以来,其在发病率和死亡率方面的非凡效果与三种药物联合治疗艾滋病毒战略有关,该战略多年来一直被视为一种恒定的范例。然而,过去十年的流行病学研究清楚地表明,抗逆转录病毒治疗并没有导致所有生物标志物的完全正常化,一定程度的全身免疫激活和炎症,包括内皮功能障碍,仍然存在。人们普遍认为,这些病理生理过程是导致非艾滋病疾病的原因,这些疾病在艾滋病毒感染者身上的临床表现平均比一般艾滋病毒阴性人群早10年。艾滋病毒治疗不是根除性的,而只是抑制性的,需要每天定期用药。这增加了副作用和药物毒性累积影响的风险。此外,预计在未来几年,需要多种药物治疗的各种其他非艾滋病合并症患者数量将显著增加。特别是新一代药物具有更高的遗传屏障和安全性,这使得人们对双药联合方案的有效性提出了疑问,其根本目标是减轻不同药物对人体的负担,同时保持与目前三药联合策略完全相当的高疗效。然而,双重联合治疗方案是否能够充分抑制慢性炎症和免疫激活的持续存在仍然没有答案。为了回答这个问题,需要来自大型前瞻性随机研究的可靠数据,而这些数据仍然缺乏。这篇综述讨论了全身免疫激活的原理,它在抗逆转录病毒治疗中的再生潜力,导致全身免疫激活的预期原因,影响它的干预选择,以及迄今为止研究的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Klinicka mikrobiologie a infekcni lekarstvi
Klinicka mikrobiologie a infekcni lekarstvi Medicine-Infectious Diseases
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信