Breathing new life into clinical testing and diagnostics: perspectives on volatile biomarkers from breath.

IF 6.6 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Jordan J Haworth, Charlotte K Pitcher, Giuseppe Ferrandino, Anthony R Hobson, Kirk L Pappan, Jonathan L D Lawson
{"title":"Breathing new life into clinical testing and diagnostics: perspectives on volatile biomarkers from breath.","authors":"Jordan J Haworth,&nbsp;Charlotte K Pitcher,&nbsp;Giuseppe Ferrandino,&nbsp;Anthony R Hobson,&nbsp;Kirk L Pappan,&nbsp;Jonathan L D Lawson","doi":"10.1080/10408363.2022.2038075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Human breath offers several benefits for diagnostic applications, including simple, noninvasive collection. Breath is a rich source of clinically-relevant biological information; this includes a volatile fraction, where greater than 1,000 volatile organic compounds (VOCs) have been described so far, and breath aerosols that carry nucleic acids, proteins, signaling molecules, and pathogens. Many of these factors, especially VOCs, are delivered to the lung by the systemic circulation, and diffusion of candidate biomarkers from blood into breath allows systematic profiling of organismal health. Biomarkers on breath offer the capability to advance early detection and precision medicine in areas of global clinical need. Breath tests are noninvasive and can be performed at home or in a primary care setting, which makes them well-suited for the kind of public screening program that could dramatically improve the early detection of conditions such as lung cancer. Since measurements of VOCs on breath largely report on metabolic changes, this too aids in the early detection of a broader range of illnesses and can be used to detect metabolic shifts that could be targeted through precision medicine. Furthermore, the ability to perform frequent sampling has envisioned applications in monitoring treatment responses. Breath has been investigated in respiratory, liver, gut, and neurological diseases and in contexts as diverse as infectious diseases and cancer. Preclinical research studies using breath have been ongoing for some time, yet only a few breath-based diagnostics tests are currently available and in widespread clinical use. Most recently, tests assessing the gut microbiome using hydrogen and methane on breath, in addition to tests using urea to detect <i>Helicobacter pylori</i> infections have been released, yet there are many more applications of breath tests still to be realized. Here, we discuss the strengths of breath as a clinical sampling matrix and the technical challenges to be addressed in developing it for clinical use. Historically, a lack of standardized methodologies has delayed the discovery and validation of biomarker candidates, resulting in a proliferation of early-stage pilot studies. We will explore how advancements in breath collection and analysis are in the process of driving renewed progress in the field, particularly in the context of gastrointestinal and chronic liver disease. Finally, we will provide a forward-looking outlook for developing the next generation of clinically relevant breath tests and how they may emerge into clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":10760,"journal":{"name":"Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences","volume":"59 5","pages":"353-372"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10408363.2022.2038075","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/2/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

Human breath offers several benefits for diagnostic applications, including simple, noninvasive collection. Breath is a rich source of clinically-relevant biological information; this includes a volatile fraction, where greater than 1,000 volatile organic compounds (VOCs) have been described so far, and breath aerosols that carry nucleic acids, proteins, signaling molecules, and pathogens. Many of these factors, especially VOCs, are delivered to the lung by the systemic circulation, and diffusion of candidate biomarkers from blood into breath allows systematic profiling of organismal health. Biomarkers on breath offer the capability to advance early detection and precision medicine in areas of global clinical need. Breath tests are noninvasive and can be performed at home or in a primary care setting, which makes them well-suited for the kind of public screening program that could dramatically improve the early detection of conditions such as lung cancer. Since measurements of VOCs on breath largely report on metabolic changes, this too aids in the early detection of a broader range of illnesses and can be used to detect metabolic shifts that could be targeted through precision medicine. Furthermore, the ability to perform frequent sampling has envisioned applications in monitoring treatment responses. Breath has been investigated in respiratory, liver, gut, and neurological diseases and in contexts as diverse as infectious diseases and cancer. Preclinical research studies using breath have been ongoing for some time, yet only a few breath-based diagnostics tests are currently available and in widespread clinical use. Most recently, tests assessing the gut microbiome using hydrogen and methane on breath, in addition to tests using urea to detect Helicobacter pylori infections have been released, yet there are many more applications of breath tests still to be realized. Here, we discuss the strengths of breath as a clinical sampling matrix and the technical challenges to be addressed in developing it for clinical use. Historically, a lack of standardized methodologies has delayed the discovery and validation of biomarker candidates, resulting in a proliferation of early-stage pilot studies. We will explore how advancements in breath collection and analysis are in the process of driving renewed progress in the field, particularly in the context of gastrointestinal and chronic liver disease. Finally, we will provide a forward-looking outlook for developing the next generation of clinically relevant breath tests and how they may emerge into clinical practice.

为临床测试和诊断注入新的生命:呼吸挥发性生物标志物的观点。
人类呼吸为诊断应用提供了几个好处,包括简单、无创收集。呼吸是临床相关生物信息的丰富来源;这包括挥发性部分,其中迄今已描述的挥发性有机化合物(VOCs)超过1000种,以及携带核酸、蛋白质、信号分子和病原体的呼吸气溶胶。其中许多因素,特别是挥发性有机化合物,通过体循环输送到肺部,候选生物标志物从血液扩散到呼吸,可以系统地分析机体健康状况。呼吸生物标志物提供了在全球临床需求领域推进早期检测和精准医疗的能力。呼吸测试是非侵入性的,可以在家里或初级保健机构进行,这使得它们非常适合用于公共筛查项目,可以显著提高对肺癌等疾病的早期发现。由于呼吸中挥发性有机化合物的测量主要报告代谢变化,这也有助于早期发现更广泛的疾病,并可用于检测代谢变化,从而通过精准医疗进行针对性治疗。此外,执行频繁采样的能力已经设想应用于监测处理反应。呼吸在呼吸系统、肝脏、肠道和神经系统疾病以及传染病和癌症等多种情况下都得到了研究。使用呼吸的临床前研究已经进行了一段时间,但目前只有少数基于呼吸的诊断测试可用并在临床广泛使用。最近,除了使用尿素检测幽门螺杆菌感染之外,还发布了使用氢气和甲烷呼气评估肠道微生物组的测试,但还有更多的呼气测试应用有待实现。在这里,我们讨论呼吸的强度作为临床采样矩阵和技术上的挑战要解决在开发它用于临床使用。从历史上看,标准化方法的缺乏推迟了候选生物标志物的发现和验证,导致早期试点研究的激增。我们将探讨呼吸收集和分析的进步如何推动该领域的新进展,特别是在胃肠道和慢性肝病的背景下。最后,我们将对开发下一代临床相关呼吸测试及其如何进入临床实践提供前瞻性展望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences publishes comprehensive and high quality review articles in all areas of clinical laboratory science, including clinical biochemistry, hematology, microbiology, pathology, transfusion medicine, genetics, immunology and molecular diagnostics. The reviews critically evaluate the status of current issues in the selected areas, with a focus on clinical laboratory diagnostics and latest advances. The adjective “critical” implies a balanced synthesis of results and conclusions that are frequently contradictory and controversial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信