Learning and verbal memory: A comparison between patients with alcohol use disorder and major depressive disorder.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Rocio Villa Diez, Julia Rodríguez-Revuelta, Ashkan Espandian, Isabel Menéndez-Miranda, Francesco Dal Santo, María Paz García-Portilla, Gerardo Flórez, Julio Bobes, Pilar Alejandra Sáiz Martínez
{"title":"Learning and verbal memory: A comparison between patients with alcohol use disorder and major depressive disorder.","authors":"Rocio Villa Diez, Julia Rodríguez-Revuelta, Ashkan Espandian, Isabel Menéndez-Miranda, Francesco Dal Santo, María Paz García-Portilla, Gerardo Flórez, Julio Bobes, Pilar Alejandra Sáiz Martínez","doi":"10.20882/adicciones.1696","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Brain damage related to alcohol consumption is associated with impairments in cognitive functions, among which memory and verbal learning stand out. The main objective is to evaluate memory and verbal learning in a sample of 111 patients with alcohol use disorder (AUD) versus 78 with major depressive disorder (MDD) and 100 healthy controls. The evaluation included sociodemographic and clinical variables, the Hamilton Depression Scale (HDRS) and the California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT). One-way ANOVA was used for comparisons between the 3 groups and two-way ANCOVAS including different covariates. The one-way ANOVA shows that patients with AUD and MDD had scores similar to each other and lower than those of the control group (p < 0.001), with the exception of the Cued CVLT (worse scores in MDD vs AUD, p < 0.001). After including age, sex and years of completed studies as covariates, the differences between the AUD and MDD groups persisted compared to the control group (p ≤ 0.003) in all indices except for the Immediate Free CVLT and the Cued CVLT (worse performance in MDD vs AUD, p = 0.022 and p = 0.035, respectively). In the second ANCOVA, after controlling for depression severity, differences were only detected between AUD patients and healthy controls (p ≤ 0.007). Patients with AUD present a significant impairment in learning and verbal memory when compared with patients with MDD and with healthy people.</p>","PeriodicalId":55560,"journal":{"name":"Adicciones","volume":"0 0","pages":"21-30"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adicciones","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20882/adicciones.1696","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Brain damage related to alcohol consumption is associated with impairments in cognitive functions, among which memory and verbal learning stand out. The main objective is to evaluate memory and verbal learning in a sample of 111 patients with alcohol use disorder (AUD) versus 78 with major depressive disorder (MDD) and 100 healthy controls. The evaluation included sociodemographic and clinical variables, the Hamilton Depression Scale (HDRS) and the California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT). One-way ANOVA was used for comparisons between the 3 groups and two-way ANCOVAS including different covariates. The one-way ANOVA shows that patients with AUD and MDD had scores similar to each other and lower than those of the control group (p < 0.001), with the exception of the Cued CVLT (worse scores in MDD vs AUD, p < 0.001). After including age, sex and years of completed studies as covariates, the differences between the AUD and MDD groups persisted compared to the control group (p ≤ 0.003) in all indices except for the Immediate Free CVLT and the Cued CVLT (worse performance in MDD vs AUD, p = 0.022 and p = 0.035, respectively). In the second ANCOVA, after controlling for depression severity, differences were only detected between AUD patients and healthy controls (p ≤ 0.007). Patients with AUD present a significant impairment in learning and verbal memory when compared with patients with MDD and with healthy people.

学习和言语记忆:酒精使用障碍和重度抑郁障碍患者之间的比较。
与饮酒相关的脑损伤与认知功能的损害有关,其中记忆和语言学习能力尤为突出。研究的主要目的是评估 111 名酒精使用障碍(AUD)患者与 78 名重度抑郁障碍(MDD)患者和 100 名健康对照者的记忆和语言学习能力。评估内容包括社会人口学和临床变量、汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HDRS)和加利福尼亚言语学习测试(CVLT)。3 组之间的比较采用单因素方差分析,双因素方差分析包括不同的协变量。单因素方差分析显示,AUD 和 MDD 患者的得分相近,但低于对照组(P<0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Adicciones
Adicciones SUBSTANCE ABUSE-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Adicciones publica artículos originales sobre el tratamiento, la prevención, estudios básicos y descriptivos en el campo de las adicciones, como son las drogas ilegales, el alcohol, el tabaco o cualquier otra adicción, procedentes de distintas disciplinas (medicina, psicología, investigación básica, investigación social, etc.). Todos los artículos son seleccionados después de pasar un proceso de revisión anónimo hecho por expertos en ese tema.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信