Prosthetic management of unilateral transradial amputation and limb deficiency: Consensus clinical standards of care.

IF 2 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Erin O'Brien, Phillip M Stevens, Steve Mandacina, Craig Jackman
{"title":"Prosthetic management of unilateral transradial amputation and limb deficiency: Consensus clinical standards of care.","authors":"Erin O'Brien, Phillip M Stevens, Steve Mandacina, Craig Jackman","doi":"10.1177/20556683211065262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Upper limb research is currently lacking detailed clinical guidance on the provision of unilateral transradial prostheses. Clinical practice guidelines are meant to serve as assistance for the decision-making process, and Delphi surveys have been used with increasing frequency within orthotics and prosthetics to create these guidelines for clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A three round Delphi survey was used to gain consensus on clinical statements regarding unilateral transradial prostheses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We achieved consensus (> 80% agreement) on a total of 40 statements by surveying 22 experts on upper limb prosthetics over three rounds of surveys. Response rate ranged from 81.8-86.4% with a total of 55 total statements under consideration throughout the duration of the survey. The 40 passing statements were arranged into nine guidelines for provision of prosthetic care in this population.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Delphi technique allowed for the creation of a set of clinical practice guidelines for the unilateral transradial patient in the absence of conclusive empirical evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":43319,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/0b/dd/10.1177_20556683211065262.PMC8724973.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20556683211065262","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Upper limb research is currently lacking detailed clinical guidance on the provision of unilateral transradial prostheses. Clinical practice guidelines are meant to serve as assistance for the decision-making process, and Delphi surveys have been used with increasing frequency within orthotics and prosthetics to create these guidelines for clinical practice.

Methods: A three round Delphi survey was used to gain consensus on clinical statements regarding unilateral transradial prostheses.

Results: We achieved consensus (> 80% agreement) on a total of 40 statements by surveying 22 experts on upper limb prosthetics over three rounds of surveys. Response rate ranged from 81.8-86.4% with a total of 55 total statements under consideration throughout the duration of the survey. The 40 passing statements were arranged into nine guidelines for provision of prosthetic care in this population.

Conclusions: The Delphi technique allowed for the creation of a set of clinical practice guidelines for the unilateral transradial patient in the absence of conclusive empirical evidence.

Abstract Image

单侧经桡动脉截肢和肢体缺损的修复治疗:共识临床护理标准。
导言:目前,上肢研究缺乏有关提供单侧经桡动脉假肢的详细临床指导。临床实践指南旨在为决策过程提供帮助,而德尔菲调查在矫形和修复学领域被越来越多地用于制定这些临床实践指南:方法:采用三轮德尔菲调查就单侧经桡动脉假体的临床声明达成共识:通过对 22 位上肢假肢专家进行三轮调查,我们就总共 40 项声明达成了共识(> 80% 的一致意见)。回复率为 81.8%-86.4%,在整个调查期间共审议了 55 项陈述。通过的 40 项陈述被归纳为九项为该人群提供假肢护理的指导原则:结论:在缺乏确凿的经验证据的情况下,德尔菲技术为单侧经桡动脉患者制定了一套临床实践指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
5.00%
发文量
37
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信