Public Trust and Trustworthiness in Biobanking: The Need for More Reflexivity.

IF 1.2 4区 生物学 Q4 CELL BIOLOGY
Biopreservation and Biobanking Pub Date : 2022-06-01 Epub Date: 2022-02-16 DOI:10.1089/bio.2021.0109
Gabrielle Samuel, Reinder Broekstra, Felix Gille, Anneke Lucassen
{"title":"Public Trust and Trustworthiness in Biobanking: The Need for More Reflexivity.","authors":"Gabrielle Samuel,&nbsp;Reinder Broekstra,&nbsp;Felix Gille,&nbsp;Anneke Lucassen","doi":"10.1089/bio.2021.0109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Low levels of public trust in biobanks are perceived to be a deterrent to participation and a threat to their sustainability. Acting in a \"trustworthy\" manner is seen to be one approach to ensuring public trust in biobanks. Striving to improve public trust in biobanks and prioritizing the need for institutional trustworthiness are both vital endeavors. However, there has been little discussion in the context of biobanking about the meaning of these two concepts, and the relationship between them. In this article, we argue that it is important to examine this, to ensure clarity around their meaning, as well as their relationship with each other as they apply to biobanking. We conclude by making a series of recommendations for biobanks.</p>","PeriodicalId":49231,"journal":{"name":"Biopreservation and Biobanking","volume":" ","pages":"291-296"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biopreservation and Biobanking","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/bio.2021.0109","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/2/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Low levels of public trust in biobanks are perceived to be a deterrent to participation and a threat to their sustainability. Acting in a "trustworthy" manner is seen to be one approach to ensuring public trust in biobanks. Striving to improve public trust in biobanks and prioritizing the need for institutional trustworthiness are both vital endeavors. However, there has been little discussion in the context of biobanking about the meaning of these two concepts, and the relationship between them. In this article, we argue that it is important to examine this, to ensure clarity around their meaning, as well as their relationship with each other as they apply to biobanking. We conclude by making a series of recommendations for biobanks.

生物银行的公众信任和可信赖性:需要更多的反思。
公众对生物银行的信任度较低被认为是对参与的一种威慑,并对其可持续性构成威胁。以“值得信赖”的方式行事被视为确保公众对生物银行信任的一种方法。努力提高公众对生物银行的信任和优先考虑机构可信度的需要都是至关重要的努力。然而,在生物银行的背景下,关于这两个概念的含义以及它们之间的关系的讨论很少。在本文中,我们认为检查这一点很重要,以确保它们的含义清晰,以及它们在应用于生物银行时彼此之间的关系。最后,我们对生物银行提出了一系列建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biopreservation and Biobanking
Biopreservation and Biobanking CELL BIOLOGY-MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
114
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Biopreservation and Biobanking is the first journal to provide a unifying forum for the peer-reviewed communication of recent advances in the emerging and evolving field of biospecimen procurement, processing, preservation and banking, distribution, and use. The Journal publishes a range of original articles focusing on current challenges and problems in biopreservation, and advances in methods to address these issues related to the processing of macromolecules, cells, and tissues for research. In a new section dedicated to Emerging Markets and Technologies, the Journal highlights the emergence of new markets and technologies that are either adopting or disrupting the biobank framework as they imprint on society. The solutions presented here are anticipated to help drive innovation within the biobank community. Biopreservation and Biobanking also explores the ethical, legal, and societal considerations surrounding biobanking and biorepository operation. Ideas and practical solutions relevant to improved quality, efficiency, and sustainability of repositories, and relating to their management, operation and oversight are discussed as well.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信