Repairing Charity Trust in Times of Accidental Crisis: The Role of Crisis History and Crisis Response Strategy.

IF 2.8 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Psychology Research and Behavior Management Pub Date : 2021-12-20 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.2147/PRBM.S341650
Xuhui Yuan, Zirong Ren, Zhengjie Liu, Weijian Li, Binghai Sun
{"title":"Repairing Charity Trust in Times of Accidental Crisis: The Role of Crisis History and Crisis Response Strategy.","authors":"Xuhui Yuan,&nbsp;Zirong Ren,&nbsp;Zhengjie Liu,&nbsp;Weijian Li,&nbsp;Binghai Sun","doi":"10.2147/PRBM.S341650","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Since it is practically significant to explore how to repair the public's trust in charities during accidental crisis, this study explored the crisis response strategies that charitable organizations with and without crisis histories could adopt when facing a current accidental crisis.</p><p><strong>Participants and methods: </strong>Study 1 (N = 177) used a 2 × 2 between-subjects design to examine the effects of crisis history (no crisis history vs. crisis history) and crisis response strategies (<i>diminish</i> vs. <i>rebuild</i>) on charity trust repair during an accidental crisis. Study 2 adopting a 3 × 2 between-subjects design examined the effects of crisis history (victim crisis history vs. accidental crisis history vs. preventable crisis history) and crisis response strategies (<i>diminish</i> vs. <i>rebuild</i>) on charity trust repair during an accidental crisis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results of Study 1 showed that the <i>diminish</i> strategy adopted by charities in an accidental crisis can enhance public trust. However, if the charity has a crisis history, the <i>rebuild</i> strategy will enhance public trust. The results of Study 2 showed that, under the victim crisis history condition, participants' charity trust was borderline significantly higher than their pre-test charity trust when the <i>diminish</i> strategy was used. However, <i>rebuild</i> strategies did not significantly increase trust. Under the accidental crisis history condition, <i>diminish</i> strategies improved trust after the accidental crisis, while <i>rebuild</i> strategies did not. Under the preventable crisis history condition, <i>diminish</i> strategies did not improve trust after an accidental crisis, while <i>rebuild</i> strategies did.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Charities should adopt a <i>diminish</i> strategy when experiencing their first accidental crisis. Charities with a victim or accidental crisis history should adopt a <i>diminish</i> strategy when facing a current accidental crisis. However, if a charity has a preventable crisis history, <i>rebuild</i> strategies are the most appropriate response to a current accidental crisis.</p>","PeriodicalId":20954,"journal":{"name":"Psychology Research and Behavior Management","volume":" ","pages":"2147-2156"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/df/59/prbm-14-2147.PMC8709546.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology Research and Behavior Management","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S341650","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose: Since it is practically significant to explore how to repair the public's trust in charities during accidental crisis, this study explored the crisis response strategies that charitable organizations with and without crisis histories could adopt when facing a current accidental crisis.

Participants and methods: Study 1 (N = 177) used a 2 × 2 between-subjects design to examine the effects of crisis history (no crisis history vs. crisis history) and crisis response strategies (diminish vs. rebuild) on charity trust repair during an accidental crisis. Study 2 adopting a 3 × 2 between-subjects design examined the effects of crisis history (victim crisis history vs. accidental crisis history vs. preventable crisis history) and crisis response strategies (diminish vs. rebuild) on charity trust repair during an accidental crisis.

Results: The results of Study 1 showed that the diminish strategy adopted by charities in an accidental crisis can enhance public trust. However, if the charity has a crisis history, the rebuild strategy will enhance public trust. The results of Study 2 showed that, under the victim crisis history condition, participants' charity trust was borderline significantly higher than their pre-test charity trust when the diminish strategy was used. However, rebuild strategies did not significantly increase trust. Under the accidental crisis history condition, diminish strategies improved trust after the accidental crisis, while rebuild strategies did not. Under the preventable crisis history condition, diminish strategies did not improve trust after an accidental crisis, while rebuild strategies did.

Conclusion: Charities should adopt a diminish strategy when experiencing their first accidental crisis. Charities with a victim or accidental crisis history should adopt a diminish strategy when facing a current accidental crisis. However, if a charity has a preventable crisis history, rebuild strategies are the most appropriate response to a current accidental crisis.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

意外危机时期的慈善信托修复:危机历史的作用与危机应对策略。
目的:由于探索在突发危机中如何修复公众对慈善机构的信任具有现实意义,本研究探讨了有危机历史和没有危机历史的慈善组织在面对当前突发危机时所采取的危机应对策略。参与者和方法:研究1 (N = 177)采用2 × 2受试者间设计,考察了危机历史(无危机历史vs危机历史)和危机应对策略(减少vs重建)对意外危机期间慈善信托修复的影响。研究2采用3 × 2被试设计,考察了危机史(受害者危机史、意外危机史、可预防危机史)和危机应对策略(减少危机、重建危机)对意外危机中慈善信托修复的影响。结果:研究1的结果表明,慈善机构在突发危机中采取的减少策略可以增强公众的信任。然而,如果慈善机构有危机的历史,重建策略将增强公众的信任。研究2的结果显示,在受害者危机史条件下,被试的慈善信任程度显著高于使用减少策略时的前测。然而,重建策略并没有显著增加信任。在偶然危机历史条件下,弱化策略对意外危机后的信任有改善作用,而重建策略对意外危机后的信任没有改善作用。在可预防的危机历史条件下,减少策略对意外危机后的信任没有改善作用,而重建策略对意外危机后的信任有改善作用。结论:慈善机构在经历第一次意外危机时应该采取减少策略。有受害者或意外危机历史的慈善机构在面对当前的意外危机时应采取减少策略。然而,如果一个慈善机构有可预防的危机历史,重建策略是对当前意外危机的最合适的反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.70%
发文量
341
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Psychology Research and Behavior Management is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on the science of psychology and its application in behavior management to develop improved outcomes in the clinical, educational, sports and business arenas. Specific topics covered in the journal include: -Neuroscience, memory and decision making -Behavior modification and management -Clinical applications -Business and sports performance management -Social and developmental studies -Animal studies The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical studies, surveys, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, case reports and extended reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信