Xuhui Yuan, Zirong Ren, Zhengjie Liu, Weijian Li, Binghai Sun
{"title":"Repairing Charity Trust in Times of Accidental Crisis: The Role of Crisis History and Crisis Response Strategy.","authors":"Xuhui Yuan, Zirong Ren, Zhengjie Liu, Weijian Li, Binghai Sun","doi":"10.2147/PRBM.S341650","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Since it is practically significant to explore how to repair the public's trust in charities during accidental crisis, this study explored the crisis response strategies that charitable organizations with and without crisis histories could adopt when facing a current accidental crisis.</p><p><strong>Participants and methods: </strong>Study 1 (N = 177) used a 2 × 2 between-subjects design to examine the effects of crisis history (no crisis history vs. crisis history) and crisis response strategies (<i>diminish</i> vs. <i>rebuild</i>) on charity trust repair during an accidental crisis. Study 2 adopting a 3 × 2 between-subjects design examined the effects of crisis history (victim crisis history vs. accidental crisis history vs. preventable crisis history) and crisis response strategies (<i>diminish</i> vs. <i>rebuild</i>) on charity trust repair during an accidental crisis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results of Study 1 showed that the <i>diminish</i> strategy adopted by charities in an accidental crisis can enhance public trust. However, if the charity has a crisis history, the <i>rebuild</i> strategy will enhance public trust. The results of Study 2 showed that, under the victim crisis history condition, participants' charity trust was borderline significantly higher than their pre-test charity trust when the <i>diminish</i> strategy was used. However, <i>rebuild</i> strategies did not significantly increase trust. Under the accidental crisis history condition, <i>diminish</i> strategies improved trust after the accidental crisis, while <i>rebuild</i> strategies did not. Under the preventable crisis history condition, <i>diminish</i> strategies did not improve trust after an accidental crisis, while <i>rebuild</i> strategies did.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Charities should adopt a <i>diminish</i> strategy when experiencing their first accidental crisis. Charities with a victim or accidental crisis history should adopt a <i>diminish</i> strategy when facing a current accidental crisis. However, if a charity has a preventable crisis history, <i>rebuild</i> strategies are the most appropriate response to a current accidental crisis.</p>","PeriodicalId":20954,"journal":{"name":"Psychology Research and Behavior Management","volume":" ","pages":"2147-2156"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/df/59/prbm-14-2147.PMC8709546.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology Research and Behavior Management","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S341650","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Purpose: Since it is practically significant to explore how to repair the public's trust in charities during accidental crisis, this study explored the crisis response strategies that charitable organizations with and without crisis histories could adopt when facing a current accidental crisis.
Participants and methods: Study 1 (N = 177) used a 2 × 2 between-subjects design to examine the effects of crisis history (no crisis history vs. crisis history) and crisis response strategies (diminish vs. rebuild) on charity trust repair during an accidental crisis. Study 2 adopting a 3 × 2 between-subjects design examined the effects of crisis history (victim crisis history vs. accidental crisis history vs. preventable crisis history) and crisis response strategies (diminish vs. rebuild) on charity trust repair during an accidental crisis.
Results: The results of Study 1 showed that the diminish strategy adopted by charities in an accidental crisis can enhance public trust. However, if the charity has a crisis history, the rebuild strategy will enhance public trust. The results of Study 2 showed that, under the victim crisis history condition, participants' charity trust was borderline significantly higher than their pre-test charity trust when the diminish strategy was used. However, rebuild strategies did not significantly increase trust. Under the accidental crisis history condition, diminish strategies improved trust after the accidental crisis, while rebuild strategies did not. Under the preventable crisis history condition, diminish strategies did not improve trust after an accidental crisis, while rebuild strategies did.
Conclusion: Charities should adopt a diminish strategy when experiencing their first accidental crisis. Charities with a victim or accidental crisis history should adopt a diminish strategy when facing a current accidental crisis. However, if a charity has a preventable crisis history, rebuild strategies are the most appropriate response to a current accidental crisis.
期刊介绍:
Psychology Research and Behavior Management is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on the science of psychology and its application in behavior management to develop improved outcomes in the clinical, educational, sports and business arenas. Specific topics covered in the journal include: -Neuroscience, memory and decision making -Behavior modification and management -Clinical applications -Business and sports performance management -Social and developmental studies -Animal studies The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical studies, surveys, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, case reports and extended reports.