Efficacy of Colchicine and Budesonide in Improvement Outcomes of Patients with Coronavirus Infection 2019 in Damascus, Syria: A Randomized Control Trial.

Q3 Immunology and Microbiology
Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Infectious Diseases Pub Date : 2021-12-31 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2021/2129006
Mohammad Alsultan, Ameer Obeid, Omar Alsamarrai, Mohamed Taher Anan, Aliaa Bakr, Nawwar Soliman, Mamdoh Kurdy, Muhannad Hag Mosa, Zain Saleh, Fatima Hujij, Jafar Barhoum
{"title":"Efficacy of Colchicine and Budesonide in Improvement Outcomes of Patients with Coronavirus Infection 2019 in Damascus, Syria: A Randomized Control Trial.","authors":"Mohammad Alsultan,&nbsp;Ameer Obeid,&nbsp;Omar Alsamarrai,&nbsp;Mohamed Taher Anan,&nbsp;Aliaa Bakr,&nbsp;Nawwar Soliman,&nbsp;Mamdoh Kurdy,&nbsp;Muhannad Hag Mosa,&nbsp;Zain Saleh,&nbsp;Fatima Hujij,&nbsp;Jafar Barhoum","doi":"10.1155/2021/2129006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>COVID-19 was reported in China in 2019 and has spread worldwide. Transmission occurs through respiratory secretions and, less commonly, through contaminated surfaces. The severity of the disease can range from asymptomatic to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). In this study, we aim to investigate the efficacy of two agents (oral colchicine and budesonide inhaler) in COVID-19 infection management, compared with supportive care alone. 77 patients were admitted to the isolation section of Al Assad University Hospital, between the 1<sup>st</sup> of August and the 30<sup>th</sup> of August. A total of 49 patients were included in this randomized control trial, after excluding ineligible patients. The random sample was divided into three groups; the first group was supportive care plus colchicine, the second group was supportive care plus budesonide inhaler, and the control group was supportive care alone. PaO2/FiO2 was improved in the budesonide group, higher than the supportive and colchicine groups. The median hospitalization days were shorter when using colchicine or budesonide, opposed to supportive care alone (8 vs 10 days, respectively). 34 patients (69.3%) were discharged, and 27 patients (55.1%) were followed up until they were weaned from oxygen and made a complete recovery. There was a significant decrease in mortality with colchicine (3 patients; 21.4%) compared with supportive care (7 patients; 33.3%) and the budesonide group (5 patients; 35.7%).</p>","PeriodicalId":39128,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Infectious Diseases","volume":"2021 ","pages":"2129006"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8720363/pdf/","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/2129006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Immunology and Microbiology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

COVID-19 was reported in China in 2019 and has spread worldwide. Transmission occurs through respiratory secretions and, less commonly, through contaminated surfaces. The severity of the disease can range from asymptomatic to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). In this study, we aim to investigate the efficacy of two agents (oral colchicine and budesonide inhaler) in COVID-19 infection management, compared with supportive care alone. 77 patients were admitted to the isolation section of Al Assad University Hospital, between the 1st of August and the 30th of August. A total of 49 patients were included in this randomized control trial, after excluding ineligible patients. The random sample was divided into three groups; the first group was supportive care plus colchicine, the second group was supportive care plus budesonide inhaler, and the control group was supportive care alone. PaO2/FiO2 was improved in the budesonide group, higher than the supportive and colchicine groups. The median hospitalization days were shorter when using colchicine or budesonide, opposed to supportive care alone (8 vs 10 days, respectively). 34 patients (69.3%) were discharged, and 27 patients (55.1%) were followed up until they were weaned from oxygen and made a complete recovery. There was a significant decrease in mortality with colchicine (3 patients; 21.4%) compared with supportive care (7 patients; 33.3%) and the budesonide group (5 patients; 35.7%).

秋水仙碱和布地奈德改善叙利亚大马士革2019冠状病毒感染患者预后的随机对照试验
新冠肺炎于2019年在中国报告,并已在全球传播。传播通过呼吸道分泌物发生,较少通过受污染的表面发生。这种疾病的严重程度从无症状到急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)不等。在这项研究中,我们的目的是调查两种药物(口服秋水仙碱和布地奈德吸入器)在新冠肺炎感染管理中的疗效,与单独的支持性护理相比。8月1日至8月30日,阿萨德大学医院隔离病房收治了77名患者。在排除了不合格的患者后,共有49名患者被纳入这项随机对照试验。随机样本分为三组;第一组为支持护理加秋水仙碱,第二组为支持治疗加布地奈德吸入器,对照组为单独支持护理。布地奈德组的PaO2/FiO2改善,高于支持组和秋水仙碱组。与单独的支持性护理相比,使用秋水仙碱或布地奈德的中位住院天数更短(分别为8天和10天)。34名患者(69.3%)出院,27名患者(55.1%)随访至缺氧并完全康复。与支持性护理(7名患者;33.3%)和布地奈德组(5名患者;35.7%)相比,秋水仙碱组(3名患者;21.4%)的死亡率显著降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信