Virtual Residency Interviews: A Survey of Anesthesiology Program Director Perspectives Amidst the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Geoffrey Ho, Jevaughn Davis, A Katharine Hindle, Eric Heinz
{"title":"Virtual Residency Interviews: A Survey of Anesthesiology Program Director Perspectives Amidst the COVID-19 Pandemic.","authors":"Geoffrey Ho,&nbsp;Jevaughn Davis,&nbsp;A Katharine Hindle,&nbsp;Eric Heinz","doi":"10.46374/volxxiii_issue4_ho","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic caused a rapid pivot from in-person to virtual residency interviews across the United States. We present a survey we conducted about the attitudes and opinions of anesthesiology program directors with regard to the 2021 virtual interview process.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a 13-question online survey disseminated to 142 anesthesiology residency program directors in February 2021, asking them to compare the most recent interview cycle to their experience with prior cycles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 46 (37%) respondents. Generally, respondents saw an increase in applicants and reported perceiving worse interpersonal relationships with applicants, significantly so in programs with small resident classes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Past research has focused on the benefits of virtual interviews for the applicant, but these should be evaluated in tandem with increased difficulties for the interviewers.</p>","PeriodicalId":75067,"journal":{"name":"The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM","volume":"23 4","pages":"E674"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8694035/pdf/i2333-0406-23-4-Ho.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46374/volxxiii_issue4_ho","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic caused a rapid pivot from in-person to virtual residency interviews across the United States. We present a survey we conducted about the attitudes and opinions of anesthesiology program directors with regard to the 2021 virtual interview process.

Methods: This was a 13-question online survey disseminated to 142 anesthesiology residency program directors in February 2021, asking them to compare the most recent interview cycle to their experience with prior cycles.

Results: There were 46 (37%) respondents. Generally, respondents saw an increase in applicants and reported perceiving worse interpersonal relationships with applicants, significantly so in programs with small resident classes.

Conclusions: Past research has focused on the benefits of virtual interviews for the applicant, but these should be evaluated in tandem with increased difficulties for the interviewers.

虚拟住院医师访谈:在COVID-19大流行期间麻醉学项目主任观点的调查。
背景:2019冠状病毒病大流行导致美国各地从面对面访谈迅速转向虚拟住院医师访谈。我们提出了一项关于麻醉学项目主管对2021年虚拟面试过程的态度和意见的调查。方法:这是一份包含13个问题的在线调查,于2021年2月分发给142名麻醉住院医师项目主任,要求他们将最近的面试周期与他们之前的经历进行比较。结果:调查对象46人(37%)。总的来说,受访者看到了申请者的增加,并报告说他们与申请人的人际关系更差,特别是在小型常驻班的项目中。结论:过去的研究集中在虚拟面试对申请人的好处上,但是这些应该与面试官增加的困难一起评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信