Investigating the prevalence of anxiety and depression during the first COVID-19 lockdown in the United Kingdom: Systematic review and meta-analyses

IF 3.8 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Luca Marie Dettmann, Sally Adams, Gemma Taylor
{"title":"Investigating the prevalence of anxiety and depression during the first COVID-19 lockdown in the United Kingdom: Systematic review and meta-analyses","authors":"Luca Marie Dettmann,&nbsp;Sally Adams,&nbsp;Gemma Taylor","doi":"10.1111/bjc.12360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on mental health. Specifically, the stringent lockdown restrictions have heightened anxiety and depression. Therefore, monitoring and supporting the mental health of the population during these unprecedented times is an immediate priority.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In this systematic review and meta-analyses, articles that explored the prevalence of anxiety and depression during the first COVID-19 lockdown in the United Kingdom were included. We searched the databases Embase, Medline (PubMed), Web of Science, and PsycINFO for cross-sectional studies. We conducted meta-analyses of prevalence rates using a random-effects model, and the heterogeneity of studies was examined using the <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> index.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Fourteen studies involving 46,158 participants were included in the review. The studies use clinical cut-off scores on anxiety and depression measures to define cases. While the prevalence of anxiety was 31.00% (95% CI = 26.00 to 35.00), the prevalence of depression was 32.00% (95% CI = 29.00 to 35.00). The prevalence of anxiety pre-pandemic was 4.65%, indicating a 26.35% increase. Whereas the prevalence of depression pre-pandemic was 4.12%, indicating a 27.88% increase. Moreover, participants experienced a slightly greater prevalence of depression than anxiety by 1.00%.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>To conclude, the first COVID-19 lockdown in the United Kingdom increased the prevalence of anxiety and depression among the general population, compared to pre-pandemic data. Hence, it is vital that policymakers and mental health services maximize their efforts to monitor mental health and provide interventions to support those in need.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Practitioner points</h3>\n \n <div>\n <b>Clinical implications</b>\n \n <ul>\n \n \n <li>Awareness of the high prevalence of anxiety and depression during the first lockdown in the United Kingdom can inform policy development that substantial effort, time, and funding of mental health services are required to support those in need.</li>\n \n \n <li>Similarly, awareness of the prevalence of anxiety and depression in the United Kingdom can contribute to the development of nation-specific interventions and initiatives.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n \n <div>\n <b>Limitations</b>\n \n <ul>\n \n \n <li>The current review focuses on the UK general population which does not allow the findings to be generalized to the global population.</li>\n \n \n <li>The indirect comparison of the current prevalence rates with the corresponding pre-pandemic prevalence rates obtained from a different study sample increases individual differences, weakening the reliability of the findings.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48211,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Clinical Psychology","volume":"61 3","pages":"757-780"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9111383/pdf/BJC-9999-0.pdf","citationCount":"30","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Clinical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjc.12360","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 30

Abstract

Background

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on mental health. Specifically, the stringent lockdown restrictions have heightened anxiety and depression. Therefore, monitoring and supporting the mental health of the population during these unprecedented times is an immediate priority.

Methods

In this systematic review and meta-analyses, articles that explored the prevalence of anxiety and depression during the first COVID-19 lockdown in the United Kingdom were included. We searched the databases Embase, Medline (PubMed), Web of Science, and PsycINFO for cross-sectional studies. We conducted meta-analyses of prevalence rates using a random-effects model, and the heterogeneity of studies was examined using the I2 index.

Results

Fourteen studies involving 46,158 participants were included in the review. The studies use clinical cut-off scores on anxiety and depression measures to define cases. While the prevalence of anxiety was 31.00% (95% CI = 26.00 to 35.00), the prevalence of depression was 32.00% (95% CI = 29.00 to 35.00). The prevalence of anxiety pre-pandemic was 4.65%, indicating a 26.35% increase. Whereas the prevalence of depression pre-pandemic was 4.12%, indicating a 27.88% increase. Moreover, participants experienced a slightly greater prevalence of depression than anxiety by 1.00%.

Conclusions

To conclude, the first COVID-19 lockdown in the United Kingdom increased the prevalence of anxiety and depression among the general population, compared to pre-pandemic data. Hence, it is vital that policymakers and mental health services maximize their efforts to monitor mental health and provide interventions to support those in need.

Practitioner points

Clinical implications
  • Awareness of the high prevalence of anxiety and depression during the first lockdown in the United Kingdom can inform policy development that substantial effort, time, and funding of mental health services are required to support those in need.
  • Similarly, awareness of the prevalence of anxiety and depression in the United Kingdom can contribute to the development of nation-specific interventions and initiatives.
Limitations
  • The current review focuses on the UK general population which does not allow the findings to be generalized to the global population.
  • The indirect comparison of the current prevalence rates with the corresponding pre-pandemic prevalence rates obtained from a different study sample increases individual differences, weakening the reliability of the findings.

Abstract Image

调查英国首次COVID-19封锁期间焦虑和抑郁的患病率:系统回顾和荟萃分析
2019冠状病毒病大流行对心理健康产生了重大影响。具体来说,严格的封锁限制加剧了焦虑和抑郁。因此,在这前所未有的时期监测和支持人口的心理健康是当务之急。方法在这项系统综述和荟萃分析中,纳入了探讨英国首次COVID-19封锁期间焦虑和抑郁患病率的文章。我们检索了Embase、Medline (PubMed)、Web of Science和PsycINFO数据库进行横断面研究。我们使用随机效应模型对患病率进行了荟萃分析,并使用I2指数检查了研究的异质性。结果14项研究共纳入46,158名受试者。这些研究使用焦虑和抑郁指标的临床分值来确定病例。焦虑的患病率为31.00% (95% CI = 26.00 ~ 35.00),抑郁的患病率为32.00% (95% CI = 29.00 ~ 35.00)。大流行前的焦虑患病率为4.65%,比前增加26.35%。而大流行前抑郁症患病率为4.12%,增加了27.88%。此外,参与者的抑郁患病率略高于焦虑患病率1.00%。总而言之,与大流行前的数据相比,英国第一次COVID-19封锁增加了普通人群中焦虑和抑郁的患病率。因此,至关重要的是,政策制定者和精神卫生服务机构应最大限度地努力监测精神卫生并提供干预措施,以支持有需要的人。认识到英国第一次封锁期间焦虑和抑郁的高发率,可以告知政策制定,需要在精神卫生服务方面投入大量精力、时间和资金,以支持有需要的人。同样,认识到焦虑和抑郁在联合王国的普遍存在,有助于制定针对国家的干预措施和举措。目前的综述集中在英国的普通人群,这并不允许研究结果推广到全球人口。将当前流行率与从不同研究样本中获得的相应大流行前流行率进行间接比较,增加了个体差异,削弱了研究结果的可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.20%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Clinical Psychology publishes original research, both empirical and theoretical, on all aspects of clinical psychology: - clinical and abnormal psychology featuring descriptive or experimental studies - aetiology, assessment and treatment of the whole range of psychological disorders irrespective of age group and setting - biological influences on individual behaviour - studies of psychological interventions and treatment on individuals, dyads, families and groups
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信