Racism May Interrupt Age-related Brain Growth of African American Children in the United States.

Journal of pediatrics & child health care Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-11-09
Shervin Assari, Ron Mincy
{"title":"Racism May Interrupt Age-related Brain Growth of African American Children in the United States.","authors":"Shervin Assari,&nbsp;Ron Mincy","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Considerable research has documented age-related growth in brain size as a marker of normal brain development. This is particularly important because brain volume has a significant role in overall cognitive performance. However, less research is done on whether age-related changes in the global brain volume differ across diverse racial and ethnic groups. We hypothesized that age-related growth in brain size would be disrupted in African American children who are historically affected by racism.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Considering race as a proxy of racism rather than genetics, this study tested racial and ethnic differences in the effects of age on global brain volume using structural brain imaging data. Built on a sociological, rather than a biological theory, we built our study on Marginalization-related Diminished Returns (MDRs) framework, which argues that under racism, resources and assets are less effective for social groups that are historically racialized, discriminated against, marginalized, and segregated. Considering age as an asset/resource that increases the global brain volume, we expected weaker effects of age on overall brain size of African American and Hispanic children, than White and non-Hispanic children, again as a result of racism.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We borrowed the structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging (sMRI) data from the Children Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study, which included 9,311 9-10 year old children. The independent variable was the child's age treated as a continuous measure (in months). The primary outcome was global brain volume. Sex, parental employment, parental education, household income, and parental marital status were the covariates. Race and ethnicity, as proxies of racism, were the moderators. To analyze the data, we used linear regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Age was positively associated with the global brain size in children. In line with the MDRs, the positive association between age and global brain volume was weaker for African American than White children, while family structure, sex, and family socioeconomic status was controlled.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Under racism, age has unequal effects on global brain size of diverse racial groups. In line with the MDRs, we observe diminished age-related growth of the brain for African American children, which documents detrimental effects of racism. For White children who are not affected by racism, age makes a large difference regarding global brain volume. Age-related growth of global brain size is diminished in African American children, whose daily lives are shaped by racism. School and residential segregation may have a role in reducing the effect of age on children's brain growth in African American families. The results should not be interpreted as inferiority of one group but social processes that hinder normal development of a historically oppressed group.</p>","PeriodicalId":93121,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pediatrics & child health care","volume":"6 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pediatrics & child health care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/11/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Considerable research has documented age-related growth in brain size as a marker of normal brain development. This is particularly important because brain volume has a significant role in overall cognitive performance. However, less research is done on whether age-related changes in the global brain volume differ across diverse racial and ethnic groups. We hypothesized that age-related growth in brain size would be disrupted in African American children who are historically affected by racism.

Purpose: Considering race as a proxy of racism rather than genetics, this study tested racial and ethnic differences in the effects of age on global brain volume using structural brain imaging data. Built on a sociological, rather than a biological theory, we built our study on Marginalization-related Diminished Returns (MDRs) framework, which argues that under racism, resources and assets are less effective for social groups that are historically racialized, discriminated against, marginalized, and segregated. Considering age as an asset/resource that increases the global brain volume, we expected weaker effects of age on overall brain size of African American and Hispanic children, than White and non-Hispanic children, again as a result of racism.

Methods: We borrowed the structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging (sMRI) data from the Children Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study, which included 9,311 9-10 year old children. The independent variable was the child's age treated as a continuous measure (in months). The primary outcome was global brain volume. Sex, parental employment, parental education, household income, and parental marital status were the covariates. Race and ethnicity, as proxies of racism, were the moderators. To analyze the data, we used linear regression models.

Results: Age was positively associated with the global brain size in children. In line with the MDRs, the positive association between age and global brain volume was weaker for African American than White children, while family structure, sex, and family socioeconomic status was controlled.

Conclusions: Under racism, age has unequal effects on global brain size of diverse racial groups. In line with the MDRs, we observe diminished age-related growth of the brain for African American children, which documents detrimental effects of racism. For White children who are not affected by racism, age makes a large difference regarding global brain volume. Age-related growth of global brain size is diminished in African American children, whose daily lives are shaped by racism. School and residential segregation may have a role in reducing the effect of age on children's brain growth in African American families. The results should not be interpreted as inferiority of one group but social processes that hinder normal development of a historically oppressed group.

种族主义可能会中断美国非裔美国儿童与年龄相关的大脑发育。
背景:相当多的研究证明,与年龄相关的大脑大小增长是大脑正常发育的标志。这一点尤其重要,因为脑容量在整体认知表现中起着重要作用。然而,关于全球脑容量的年龄相关变化是否在不同种族和民族群体中有所不同的研究较少。我们假设,在历史上受到种族主义影响的非裔美国儿童中,与年龄相关的大脑大小增长会受到干扰。目的:考虑到种族是种族主义的代表,而不是基因,本研究使用脑结构成像数据测试了种族和民族差异对年龄对全球脑容量的影响。基于社会学而非生物学理论,我们建立了边缘化相关收益递减(mdr)框架研究,该框架认为,在种族主义下,资源和资产对历史上被种族化、歧视、边缘化和隔离的社会群体的效率较低。考虑到年龄是增加全球脑容量的资产/资源,我们预计年龄对非裔美国人和西班牙裔儿童总体脑容量的影响要弱于白人和非西班牙裔儿童,这也是种族主义的结果。方法:我们借用儿童脑认知发展(ABCD)研究的结构磁共振成像(sMRI)数据,其中包括9,311名9-10岁儿童。自变量是儿童的年龄,作为连续测量(以月为单位)。主要结果是脑容量。性别、父母就业、父母受教育程度、家庭收入和父母婚姻状况为协变量。种族和民族,作为种族主义的代理人,是调节者。为了分析数据,我们使用线性回归模型。结果:年龄与儿童脑容量呈正相关。与mdr一致,年龄与全球脑容量之间的正相关关系在非裔美国儿童中比白人儿童弱,而家庭结构、性别和家庭社会经济地位是受控的。结论:在种族歧视下,年龄对不同种族的脑容量的影响是不平等的。与mdr一致,我们观察到非裔美国儿童与年龄相关的大脑发育减少,这证明了种族主义的有害影响。对于不受种族主义影响的白人儿童来说,年龄对全球脑容量有很大影响。在非裔美国儿童中,与年龄相关的全球脑容量增长减少,他们的日常生活受到种族主义的影响。在非裔美国家庭中,学校和住所的隔离可能在减少年龄对儿童大脑发育的影响方面发挥了作用。结果不应该被解释为一个群体的自卑,而是阻碍历史上受压迫群体正常发展的社会过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信