Do aggravating rhinologic symptoms at work indicate occupational exposure? A cross-sectional outpatient clinic study.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 ALLERGY
Maija Ylivuori, Liisa Airaksinen, Harri Sintonen, Risto P Roine, Maija Hytönen, Paula Virkkula
{"title":"Do aggravating rhinologic symptoms at work indicate occupational exposure? A cross-sectional outpatient clinic study.","authors":"Maija Ylivuori, Liisa Airaksinen, Harri Sintonen, Risto P Roine, Maija Hytönen, Paula Virkkula","doi":"10.12932/AP-070621-1151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Air impurities can exacerbate or cause rhinologic diseases. However, only a few studies have assessed rhinologic patients' symptoms at work.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study surveys the impact of work on rhinology clinic patients' quality of life in relation to work-related respiratory exposures. In addition, we surveyed patients' sick leave periods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited adult employed rhinology patients referred to the otorhinolaryngology clinic. A total of 177 patients were included. We collected data on patients' medical history, rhinologic disease-specific and generic quality of life, current or most recent job title, a description of current work, nasal symptoms, possible worked-related symptom triggers and sick leave periods during the preceding year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 101 (57.1%) patients reported exacerbated rhinologic symptoms at work and reported more severe rhinologic disease and a lower disease-specific quality of life compared to non-work-related rhinologic patients (P = 0.008). A minority, 24.3% of our patients were exposed to any specific occupational respiratory sensitizer or irritant at work. The mean sick leave period due to rhinologic disease was 7.7 days per year.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Exposure to specific occupational sensitizers or irritants did not associate with increasing symptoms at work or quality of life amongst our patients. Most rhinology patients reported exacerbated symptoms at work. They appeared to be more symptomatic than the rest of the patients and, therefore, possibly hyperreactive to unspecific respiratory triggers at work. Rhinologic diseases caused our patients a marked burden with high work absenteeism.</p>","PeriodicalId":8552,"journal":{"name":"Asian Pacific journal of allergy and immunology","volume":" ","pages":"227-233"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Pacific journal of allergy and immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12932/AP-070621-1151","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Air impurities can exacerbate or cause rhinologic diseases. However, only a few studies have assessed rhinologic patients' symptoms at work.

Objective: This study surveys the impact of work on rhinology clinic patients' quality of life in relation to work-related respiratory exposures. In addition, we surveyed patients' sick leave periods.

Methods: We recruited adult employed rhinology patients referred to the otorhinolaryngology clinic. A total of 177 patients were included. We collected data on patients' medical history, rhinologic disease-specific and generic quality of life, current or most recent job title, a description of current work, nasal symptoms, possible worked-related symptom triggers and sick leave periods during the preceding year.

Results: In total, 101 (57.1%) patients reported exacerbated rhinologic symptoms at work and reported more severe rhinologic disease and a lower disease-specific quality of life compared to non-work-related rhinologic patients (P = 0.008). A minority, 24.3% of our patients were exposed to any specific occupational respiratory sensitizer or irritant at work. The mean sick leave period due to rhinologic disease was 7.7 days per year.

Conclusions: Exposure to specific occupational sensitizers or irritants did not associate with increasing symptoms at work or quality of life amongst our patients. Most rhinology patients reported exacerbated symptoms at work. They appeared to be more symptomatic than the rest of the patients and, therefore, possibly hyperreactive to unspecific respiratory triggers at work. Rhinologic diseases caused our patients a marked burden with high work absenteeism.

工作时鼻部症状加重是否表明存在职业暴露?一项横断面门诊研究。
背景:空气中的杂质会加重或导致鼻病。然而,只有少数研究对鼻病患者在工作时的症状进行了评估:本研究调查了工作对鼻科门诊病人生活质量的影响,这些影响与工作相关的呼吸道暴露有关。此外,我们还调查了患者的病假时间:我们招募了转诊至耳鼻喉科诊所的成年在职鼻科患者。共纳入 177 名患者。我们收集了患者的病史、鼻病特异性和一般性生活质量、目前或最近的工作职位、目前工作的描述、鼻部症状、可能与工作相关的症状诱因以及上一年的病假时间等数据:与非工作相关鼻病患者相比,共有 101 名(57.1%)患者在工作时鼻部症状加重,鼻部疾病更严重,疾病特异性生活质量更低(P = 0.008)。少数患者(24.3%)在工作中接触过任何特定的职业性呼吸道致敏物质或刺激物。鼻病患者每年因鼻病请病假的平均时间为 7.7 天:结论:接触特定的职业致敏物质或刺激物与患者工作症状的增加或生活质量的提高无关。大多数鼻病患者在工作时症状加重。他们的症状似乎比其他患者更严重,因此可能对工作中的非特异性呼吸道诱因反应过度。鼻科疾病给我们的患者造成了明显的负担,缺勤率很高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
74
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Asian Pacific Journal of Allergy and Immunology (APJAI) is an online open access journal with the recent impact factor (2018) 1.747 APJAI published 4 times per annum (March, June, September, December). Four issues constitute one volume. APJAI publishes original research articles of basic science, clinical science and reviews on various aspects of allergy and immunology. This journal is an official journal of and published by the Allergy, Asthma and Immunology Association, Thailand. The scopes include mechanism, pathogenesis, host-pathogen interaction, host-environment interaction, allergic diseases, immune-mediated diseases, epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment and prevention, immunotherapy, and vaccine. All papers are published in English and are refereed to international standards.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信