The Use of Social Media among Saudi Ophthalmologists: A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study.

IF 0.5 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2021-12-31 eCollection Date: 2021-07-01 DOI:10.4103/meajo.meajo_125_21
Omar Al Abbasi, Abdulaziz Al Taisan, Bader S Alqahtani, Khalid Alburayk, Saad H Alenezi, Adi Mohammed Al Owaifeer
{"title":"The Use of Social Media among Saudi Ophthalmologists: A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Omar Al Abbasi,&nbsp;Abdulaziz Al Taisan,&nbsp;Bader S Alqahtani,&nbsp;Khalid Alburayk,&nbsp;Saad H Alenezi,&nbsp;Adi Mohammed Al Owaifeer","doi":"10.4103/meajo.meajo_125_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study is to evaluate the use of and beliefs toward social media (SM) among Saudi ophthalmologists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a cross-sectional descriptive study. A web-based, self-administered questionnaire was e-mailed to ophthalmologists within Saudi Arabia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 392 recipients, 293 completed the survey (74.7% response rate). The vast majority (90.1%) used at least one platform for personal and professional purposes or either. The three most commonly used applications were Twitter (72.3%), Snapchat (65.9%), and Instagram (51.9%). The opinions of respondents with regard to the different aspects of SM varied widely. Around half (56.7%) believed that it was permissible for ophthalmologists to promote themselves on SM and 70.6% agreed that SM usage by health-care professionals should be regulated. Participants believe that SM had both a positive and a negative impact on their daily life and clinical practice. For example, 94 (32.1%) respondents stated that it improved their ability to educate patients, on the other hand, 80 (27.3%) reported that SM wastes quality time that can be spent on something more productive.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results demonstrate an increased utilization of SM among Saudi ophthalmologists. The ethical aspects of SM usage were a matter of controversy among our respondents. This necessitates the establishment of guidelines by regulatory bodies and/or individual health-care organizations.</p>","PeriodicalId":18740,"journal":{"name":"Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"28 3","pages":"159-163"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8763099/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/meajo.meajo_125_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the use of and beliefs toward social media (SM) among Saudi ophthalmologists.

Methods: This was a cross-sectional descriptive study. A web-based, self-administered questionnaire was e-mailed to ophthalmologists within Saudi Arabia.

Results: Out of 392 recipients, 293 completed the survey (74.7% response rate). The vast majority (90.1%) used at least one platform for personal and professional purposes or either. The three most commonly used applications were Twitter (72.3%), Snapchat (65.9%), and Instagram (51.9%). The opinions of respondents with regard to the different aspects of SM varied widely. Around half (56.7%) believed that it was permissible for ophthalmologists to promote themselves on SM and 70.6% agreed that SM usage by health-care professionals should be regulated. Participants believe that SM had both a positive and a negative impact on their daily life and clinical practice. For example, 94 (32.1%) respondents stated that it improved their ability to educate patients, on the other hand, 80 (27.3%) reported that SM wastes quality time that can be spent on something more productive.

Conclusion: Our results demonstrate an increased utilization of SM among Saudi ophthalmologists. The ethical aspects of SM usage were a matter of controversy among our respondents. This necessitates the establishment of guidelines by regulatory bodies and/or individual health-care organizations.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

社交媒体在沙特眼科医生中的使用:一项描述性横断面研究。
目的:本研究的目的是评估沙特眼科医生对社交媒体(SM)的使用和信仰。方法:采用横断面描述性研究。一份基于网络、自我管理的问卷通过电子邮件发送给沙特阿拉伯的眼科医生。结果:392名患者中,有293人完成了调查,有效率为74.7%。绝大多数人(90.1%)至少使用一个平台用于个人和职业目的。最常用的三个应用程序是Twitter(72.3%)、Snapchat(65.9%)和Instagram(51.9%)。受访者对SM不同方面的看法差异很大。大约一半(56.7%)的人认为眼科医生可以使用SM进行自我推销,70.6%的人同意应管制卫生保健专业人员使用SM。参与者认为SM对他们的日常生活和临床实践既有积极的影响,也有消极的影响。例如,94名(32.1%)受访者表示,SM提高了他们教育患者的能力,另一方面,80名(27.3%)受访者表示,SM浪费了可以花在更有成效的事情上的宝贵时间。结论:我们的研究结果表明,沙特眼科医生对SM的使用有所增加。SM使用的伦理方面在我们的受访者中是一个有争议的问题。这就需要管理机构和/或个别保健组织制定准则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊介绍: The Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology (MEAJO), published four times per year in print and online, is an official journal of the Middle East African Council of Ophthalmology (MEACO). It is an international, peer-reviewed journal whose mission includes publication of original research of interest to ophthalmologists in the Middle East and Africa, and to provide readers with high quality educational review articles from world-renown experts. MEAJO, previously known as Middle East Journal of Ophthalmology (MEJO) was founded by Dr Akef El Maghraby in 1993.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信