An Analysis of Patient Experience and Adherence to Diabetes Medication among Military Health System Beneficiaries.

Kimberley Marshall-Aiyelawo, Beatrice Abiero, Amanda Sackett, Sharon Beamer, Melissa Gliner, Terry McDavid, Janice Ellison
{"title":"An Analysis of Patient Experience and Adherence to Diabetes Medication among Military Health System Beneficiaries.","authors":"Kimberley Marshall-Aiyelawo,&nbsp;Beatrice Abiero,&nbsp;Amanda Sackett,&nbsp;Sharon Beamer,&nbsp;Melissa Gliner,&nbsp;Terry McDavid,&nbsp;Janice Ellison","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Few studies have investigated the relationship between patient experience and diabetes medication adherence among Military Health System (MHS) beneficiaries. We explored the link between patient experience survey ratings and adherence to diabetes medication. The hypothesis was that adherent patients would report better provider-patient experience than non-adherent patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data included 2,599 patient surveys and pharmacy refill records. Adherence was determined using proportion of days covered (PDC) methodology where a patient must have had medications available 80% or more of the time during the observation period. Analysis involved multivariable logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Medication adherence was 60.2%. Regarding patient experience, those who were with their provider for 5 years or more had greater odds of adherence (OR 1.86[95%CI 1.19, 2.90]) Most of the patients in this study had high morbidity and high care utilization. Patient characteristics that significantly (p is less than 0.05) differentiated adherent versus non-adherent patients were race, mental health status, multiple medication use, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels, and health utilization.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Two key factors of adherence that emerged from this study are that moderate (OR 2.54[95%CI 1.35, 4.75]) and elevated (OR 2.35[95%CI 1.29, 4.30]) HbA1c and patients with 7+ health care providers (OR 1.56[95%CI 1.06,2.29]) had greater odds of adherence. Findings suggest that ability to see provider when needed and provider continuity support adherence to treatment. The practice implications of this study are health practitioners can leverage patient experience and pharmacy data to identify patterns of adherence among patients in the MHS.</p>","PeriodicalId":74148,"journal":{"name":"Medical journal (Fort Sam Houston, Tex.)","volume":" Per 22-01/02/03","pages":"41-49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical journal (Fort Sam Houston, Tex.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Few studies have investigated the relationship between patient experience and diabetes medication adherence among Military Health System (MHS) beneficiaries. We explored the link between patient experience survey ratings and adherence to diabetes medication. The hypothesis was that adherent patients would report better provider-patient experience than non-adherent patients.

Methods: Data included 2,599 patient surveys and pharmacy refill records. Adherence was determined using proportion of days covered (PDC) methodology where a patient must have had medications available 80% or more of the time during the observation period. Analysis involved multivariable logistic regression.

Results: Medication adherence was 60.2%. Regarding patient experience, those who were with their provider for 5 years or more had greater odds of adherence (OR 1.86[95%CI 1.19, 2.90]) Most of the patients in this study had high morbidity and high care utilization. Patient characteristics that significantly (p is less than 0.05) differentiated adherent versus non-adherent patients were race, mental health status, multiple medication use, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels, and health utilization.

Conclusion: Two key factors of adherence that emerged from this study are that moderate (OR 2.54[95%CI 1.35, 4.75]) and elevated (OR 2.35[95%CI 1.29, 4.30]) HbA1c and patients with 7+ health care providers (OR 1.56[95%CI 1.06,2.29]) had greater odds of adherence. Findings suggest that ability to see provider when needed and provider continuity support adherence to treatment. The practice implications of this study are health practitioners can leverage patient experience and pharmacy data to identify patterns of adherence among patients in the MHS.

军人医疗保健系统受益人糖尿病用药经验及依从性分析
目的:探讨军队卫生系统(MHS)受益人的患者体验与糖尿病药物依从性之间的关系。我们探索了患者体验调查评分与糖尿病药物依从性之间的联系。假设是依从性患者比非依从性患者报告更好的提供者-患者体验。方法:资料包括2599例患者调查和药房补充记录。依从性采用覆盖天数比例(PDC)方法确定,在观察期间,患者必须在80%或更多的时间内使用药物。分析采用多变量逻辑回归。结果:药物依从性为60.2%。在患者经历方面,与他们的提供者在一起5年或更长时间的患者有更大的依从性(or 1.86[95%CI 1.19, 2.90])。本研究中的大多数患者具有高发病率和高护理利用率。有显著差异(p < 0.05)的粘附与非粘附患者的患者特征是种族、精神健康状况、多种药物使用、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平和健康利用。结论:本研究得出的依从性的两个关键因素是中度(OR 2.54[95%CI 1.35, 4.75])和升高(OR 2.35[95%CI 1.29, 4.30]) HbA1c和有7个以上医疗服务提供者的患者(OR 1.56[95%CI 1.06,2.29])具有更大的依从性。研究结果表明,在需要时看医生的能力和医生的连续性支持治疗的依从性。本研究的实践意义在于卫生从业人员可以利用患者经验和药房数据来确定MHS患者的依从性模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信