An innovation tournament to improve medical residency

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
David A. Asch, Lisa M. Bellini, Sanjay V. Desai, Deirdre Darragh, Elizabeth L. Asch, Judy A. Shea
{"title":"An innovation tournament to improve medical residency","authors":"David A. Asch,&nbsp;Lisa M. Bellini,&nbsp;Sanjay V. Desai,&nbsp;Deirdre Darragh,&nbsp;Elizabeth L. Asch,&nbsp;Judy A. Shea","doi":"10.1016/j.hjdsi.2022.100614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Two large national studies of resident duty hours incidentally revealed surgical and medical resident dissatisfaction with residency training. Aiming for an inclusive and democratic approach to improve graduate medical education, we conducted a national innovation tournament--reaching out to the program directors of all 474 US internal medicine residency programs to invite them and their residents and associate program directors to participate. Participants could submit multiple ideas as individuals or teams in four domains: [1] resident well-being and personal and professional development; [2] resident education and clinical preparedness; [3] resident sleep and alertness; and [4] patient safety. Residents and program directors were reinvited to rate ideas, whether they had submitted ideas themselves or not. We used a schedule of lottery-based prizes to stimulate the submission and rating of ideas and encourage engagement. 164 residents and program directors from 51 different programs submitted 328 ideas. 153 residents and program directors from 48 different programs submitted 15,345 ratings of ideas. Winning ideas aimed to reduce residents’ work burden or improve their mental health, sleep, eating, or relaxation or reflected technical fixes to the operations of residency, such as changing vacation schedules and the timing of pay. The results of this tournament provided actionable suggestions to improve residency training now being tested in our own residency programs. Innovation tournaments drive engagement and generate value by their opportunities for inclusion and by shifting problem solving to the end user.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":29963,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare-The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation","volume":"10 1","pages":"Article 100614"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/7d/5f/nihms-1778219.PMC8881444.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare-The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213076422000033","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Two large national studies of resident duty hours incidentally revealed surgical and medical resident dissatisfaction with residency training. Aiming for an inclusive and democratic approach to improve graduate medical education, we conducted a national innovation tournament--reaching out to the program directors of all 474 US internal medicine residency programs to invite them and their residents and associate program directors to participate. Participants could submit multiple ideas as individuals or teams in four domains: [1] resident well-being and personal and professional development; [2] resident education and clinical preparedness; [3] resident sleep and alertness; and [4] patient safety. Residents and program directors were reinvited to rate ideas, whether they had submitted ideas themselves or not. We used a schedule of lottery-based prizes to stimulate the submission and rating of ideas and encourage engagement. 164 residents and program directors from 51 different programs submitted 328 ideas. 153 residents and program directors from 48 different programs submitted 15,345 ratings of ideas. Winning ideas aimed to reduce residents’ work burden or improve their mental health, sleep, eating, or relaxation or reflected technical fixes to the operations of residency, such as changing vacation schedules and the timing of pay. The results of this tournament provided actionable suggestions to improve residency training now being tested in our own residency programs. Innovation tournaments drive engagement and generate value by their opportunities for inclusion and by shifting problem solving to the end user.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

一个提高住院医师水平的创新比赛
两项关于住院医师值班时间的大型全国性研究偶然揭示了外科和内科住院医师对住院医师培训的不满。为了以包容和民主的方式改善研究生医学教育,我们举办了一场全国创新锦标赛——联系了美国所有474个内科住院医师项目的项目主任,邀请他们及其住院医师和副项目主任参加。参与者可以以个人或团队的身份在以下四个领域提交多个想法:[1]居民福利、个人和职业发展;[2]住院医师教育与临床准备;[3]常驻睡眠和警觉性;[4]患者安全。住院医生和项目主管被再次邀请对想法进行评分,不管他们是否自己提交了想法。我们使用了一个基于彩票的奖励计划来刺激想法的提交和评级,并鼓励参与。来自51个不同项目的164名居民和项目主任提交了328个想法。来自48个不同项目的153名住院医生和项目主管提交了15345个评分。获奖的创意旨在减轻住院医生的工作负担,或改善他们的心理健康、睡眠、饮食或放松,或反映了对住院医生操作的技术修复,如改变假期安排和工资时间。这次比赛的结果为改进住院医师培训提供了可行的建议,目前正在我们自己的住院医师培训项目中进行测试。创新竞赛通过提供包容的机会和将解决问题的方法转移给最终用户,从而推动用户参与并创造价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: HealthCare: The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation is a quarterly journal. The journal promotes cutting edge research on innovation in healthcare delivery, including improvements in systems, processes, management, and applied information technology. The journal welcomes submissions of original research articles, case studies capturing "policy to practice" or "implementation of best practices", commentaries, and critical reviews of relevant novel programs and products. The scope of the journal includes topics directly related to delivering healthcare, such as: ● Care redesign ● Applied health IT ● Payment innovation ● Managerial innovation ● Quality improvement (QI) research ● New training and education models ● Comparative delivery innovation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信