Bandwidth and Common Mode Optimization for Current and Voltage Sources in Bioimpedance Spectroscopy.

Q3 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Journal of Electrical Bioimpedance Pub Date : 2021-12-27 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.2478/joeb-2021-0016
Tobias Menden, Jascha Matuszczyk, Steffen Leonhardt, Marian Walter
{"title":"Bandwidth and Common Mode Optimization for Current and Voltage Sources in Bioimpedance Spectroscopy.","authors":"Tobias Menden,&nbsp;Jascha Matuszczyk,&nbsp;Steffen Leonhardt,&nbsp;Marian Walter","doi":"10.2478/joeb-2021-0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bioimpedance measurements use current or voltage sources to inject an excitation signal into the body. These sources require a high bandwidth, typically from 1 kHz to 1 MHz. Besides a low common mode, current limitation is necessary for patient safety. In this paper, we compare a symmetric enhanced Howland current source (EHCS) and a symmetric voltage source (VS) based on a non-inverting amplifier between 1 kHz and 1 MHz. A common mode reduction circuit has been implemented in both sources. The bandwidth of each source was optimized in simulations and achieved a stable output impedance over the whole frequency range. In laboratory measurements, the output impedance of the EHCS had its -3 dB point at 400 kHz. In contrast, the VS reached the +3 dB point at 600 kHz. On average over the observed frequency range, the active common mode compensation achieved a common mode rejection of -57.7 dB and -71.8 dB for the EHCS and VS, respectively. Our modifications to classical EHCS and VS circuits achieved a low common mode signal between 1 kHz and 1 MHz without the addition of complex circuitry, like general impedance converters. As a conclusion we found VSs to be superior to EHCSs for bioimpedance spectroscopy due to the higher bandwidth performance. However, this only applies if the injected current of the VS can be measured.</p>","PeriodicalId":38125,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Electrical Bioimpedance","volume":"12 1","pages":"135-146"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8713387/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Electrical Bioimpedance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/joeb-2021-0016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Bioimpedance measurements use current or voltage sources to inject an excitation signal into the body. These sources require a high bandwidth, typically from 1 kHz to 1 MHz. Besides a low common mode, current limitation is necessary for patient safety. In this paper, we compare a symmetric enhanced Howland current source (EHCS) and a symmetric voltage source (VS) based on a non-inverting amplifier between 1 kHz and 1 MHz. A common mode reduction circuit has been implemented in both sources. The bandwidth of each source was optimized in simulations and achieved a stable output impedance over the whole frequency range. In laboratory measurements, the output impedance of the EHCS had its -3 dB point at 400 kHz. In contrast, the VS reached the +3 dB point at 600 kHz. On average over the observed frequency range, the active common mode compensation achieved a common mode rejection of -57.7 dB and -71.8 dB for the EHCS and VS, respectively. Our modifications to classical EHCS and VS circuits achieved a low common mode signal between 1 kHz and 1 MHz without the addition of complex circuitry, like general impedance converters. As a conclusion we found VSs to be superior to EHCSs for bioimpedance spectroscopy due to the higher bandwidth performance. However, this only applies if the injected current of the VS can be measured.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

生物阻抗谱中电流和电压源的带宽和共模优化。
生物阻抗测量使用电流或电压源将激励信号注入体内。这些源需要高带宽,通常从1 kHz到1 MHz。除了低共模外,电流限制对患者安全也是必要的。在本文中,我们比较了对称增强Howland电流源(EHCS)和对称电压源(VS)基于1 kHz和1 MHz之间的非反相放大器。在两个源中都实现了共模减小电路。在仿真中对各源的带宽进行了优化,在整个频率范围内实现了稳定的输出阻抗。在实验室测量中,EHCS的输出阻抗在400 kHz时具有-3 dB点。相比之下,VS在600 kHz时达到+ 3db点。在观测到的平均频率范围内,EHCS和VS的主动共模补偿分别实现了-57.7 dB和-71.8 dB的共模抑制。我们对经典EHCS和VS电路的修改实现了1 kHz和1 MHz之间的低共模信号,而无需添加复杂的电路,如一般阻抗转换器。综上所述,由于VSs具有更高的带宽性能,因此在生物阻抗谱方面优于ehcs。然而,这只适用于可以测量VS注入电流的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Electrical Bioimpedance
Journal of Electrical Bioimpedance Engineering-Biomedical Engineering
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信