Is additive manufacturing a magic bullet to resupply lacking PPE? Producing respirators and face shields during COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review.

Q3 Medicine
Jakub Rzeszuto, Patryk Kaczor, Bernadetta Kosztulska, Iwona Handzlik, Szymon Suwała, Roman Junik
{"title":"Is additive manufacturing a magic bullet to resupply lacking PPE? Producing respirators and face shields during COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review.","authors":"Jakub Rzeszuto,&nbsp;Patryk Kaczor,&nbsp;Bernadetta Kosztulska,&nbsp;Iwona Handzlik,&nbsp;Szymon Suwała,&nbsp;Roman Junik","doi":"10.17219/pim/144329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused an increase in the demand for personal protective equipment (PPE) and disruptions in production chains, resulting in an acute shortage of PPE. A possible solution to this problem was additive manufacturing (AM) technology - allowing for a quick start of the production of PPE and potentially able to meet the demand until the production is restored. In addition, AM allows for the production of PPE prototypes with potentially greater comfort of use or degree of protection. In order to assess the production of PPE in AM during the COVID-19 pandemic, previously published articles in this field were analyzed. After analyzing abstracts and full texts, 30 original works were selected from the initially collected 487 articles. Based on the analyzed literature, it was found that there are not enough studies comparing traditional and AM PPE as well as not enough comparisons of the different types of AM PPE with each other. In many cases, researchers focused only on the subjective assessment of the comfort of using PPE, without assessing their effectiveness in preventing infections. Despite that, AM has a great potential to quickly produce lacking PPE. Respirators and shields made by AM were rated by the vast majority of users as comfortable to wear. Some of the respirators could be adapted to a specific user, by designing on the basis of a face scan or after warming up the finished print and modeling the shape.</p>","PeriodicalId":20355,"journal":{"name":"Polimery w medycynie","volume":"51 2","pages":"91-102"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polimery w medycynie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17219/pim/144329","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused an increase in the demand for personal protective equipment (PPE) and disruptions in production chains, resulting in an acute shortage of PPE. A possible solution to this problem was additive manufacturing (AM) technology - allowing for a quick start of the production of PPE and potentially able to meet the demand until the production is restored. In addition, AM allows for the production of PPE prototypes with potentially greater comfort of use or degree of protection. In order to assess the production of PPE in AM during the COVID-19 pandemic, previously published articles in this field were analyzed. After analyzing abstracts and full texts, 30 original works were selected from the initially collected 487 articles. Based on the analyzed literature, it was found that there are not enough studies comparing traditional and AM PPE as well as not enough comparisons of the different types of AM PPE with each other. In many cases, researchers focused only on the subjective assessment of the comfort of using PPE, without assessing their effectiveness in preventing infections. Despite that, AM has a great potential to quickly produce lacking PPE. Respirators and shields made by AM were rated by the vast majority of users as comfortable to wear. Some of the respirators could be adapted to a specific user, by designing on the basis of a face scan or after warming up the finished print and modeling the shape.

增材制造是补充缺乏个人防护装备的灵丹妙药吗?在COVID-19大流行期间生产呼吸器和面罩:系统回顾。
2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行导致对个人防护装备(PPE)的需求增加,生产链中断,导致个人防护装备严重短缺。这个问题的一个可能的解决方案是增材制造(AM)技术——允许快速启动PPE的生产,并有可能满足需求,直到生产恢复。此外,增材制造允许生产具有更大使用舒适度或保护程度的PPE原型。为了评估2019冠状病毒病大流行期间AM生产PPE的情况,分析了该领域先前发表的文章。通过摘要和全文分析,从最初收录的487篇文章中筛选出30篇原创作品。通过对文献的分析发现,比较传统防护用品和AM防护用品的研究不够多,不同类型AM防护用品之间的比较也不够多。在许多情况下,研究人员只关注使用PPE舒适度的主观评估,而没有评估其预防感染的有效性。尽管如此,AM有很大的潜力来快速生产缺乏的PPE。AM制造的呼吸器和防护盾被绝大多数用户评为佩戴舒适。一些口罩可以根据特定用户的需要进行定制,比如在面部扫描的基础上进行设计,或者在对打印成品进行预热和建模后进行设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Polimery w medycynie
Polimery w medycynie Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
53 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信