Can a Single Measurement of Apixaban Levels Identify Patients at Risk of Overexposure? A Prospective Cohort Study.

Tim A C de Vries, Jack Hirsh, Vinai C Bhagirath, Jeffrey S Ginsberg, Ron Pisters, Martin E W Hemels, Joris R de Groot, John W Eikelboom, Noel C Chan
{"title":"Can a Single Measurement of Apixaban Levels Identify Patients at Risk of Overexposure? A Prospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Tim A C de Vries,&nbsp;Jack Hirsh,&nbsp;Vinai C Bhagirath,&nbsp;Jeffrey S Ginsberg,&nbsp;Ron Pisters,&nbsp;Martin E W Hemels,&nbsp;Joris R de Groot,&nbsp;John W Eikelboom,&nbsp;Noel C Chan","doi":"10.1055/s-0041-1740492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>  Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are frequently treated with apixaban 2.5-mg twice daily (BID) off-label, presumably to reduce the bleeding risk. However, this approach has the potential to increase the risk of ischemic stroke. If a single measurement could reliably identify patients with high drug levels, the increased stroke risk may be mitigated by confining off-label dose reduction to such patients. <b>Objectives</b>  This study aimed to determine whether a single high apixaban level is predictive of a similarly high level when the test is repeated in 2 months. <b>Methods</b>  In this prospective cohort study of clinic patients receiving apixaban 5-mg BID for AF or venous thromboembolism, peak and trough apixaban levels were measured using the STA-Liquid anti-Xa assay at baseline and 2 months. We calculated the proportions of patients with levels that remained in the upper quintile. <b>Results</b>  Of 100 enrolled patients, 82 came for a second visit, 55 of whom were treated with apixaban 5-mg BID. Seven (63.6%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 35.4-84.8%) and nine (81.8%, 95% CI: 52.3-94.9%) of 11 patients with a baseline trough and peak level in the upper quintile, respectively, had a subsequent level that remained within this range. Only one (9.1%, 95% CI: 1.6-37.7%) patient had a subsequent level that fell just lower than the median. <b>Conclusion</b>  The trough and peak levels of apixaban in patients who have a high level on a single occasion, usually remain high when the assay is repeated in 2 months. Accordingly, the finding of a high apixaban level in patients deemed to be at high risk of bleeding, allows physicians contemplating off-label use of the 2.5-mg BID dose to limit its use to selected patients who are less likely to be exposed to an increased risk of thrombosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":22238,"journal":{"name":"TH Open: Companion Journal to Thrombosis and Haemostasis","volume":" ","pages":"e10-e17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8786560/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TH Open: Companion Journal to Thrombosis and Haemostasis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1740492","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background  Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are frequently treated with apixaban 2.5-mg twice daily (BID) off-label, presumably to reduce the bleeding risk. However, this approach has the potential to increase the risk of ischemic stroke. If a single measurement could reliably identify patients with high drug levels, the increased stroke risk may be mitigated by confining off-label dose reduction to such patients. Objectives  This study aimed to determine whether a single high apixaban level is predictive of a similarly high level when the test is repeated in 2 months. Methods  In this prospective cohort study of clinic patients receiving apixaban 5-mg BID for AF or venous thromboembolism, peak and trough apixaban levels were measured using the STA-Liquid anti-Xa assay at baseline and 2 months. We calculated the proportions of patients with levels that remained in the upper quintile. Results  Of 100 enrolled patients, 82 came for a second visit, 55 of whom were treated with apixaban 5-mg BID. Seven (63.6%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 35.4-84.8%) and nine (81.8%, 95% CI: 52.3-94.9%) of 11 patients with a baseline trough and peak level in the upper quintile, respectively, had a subsequent level that remained within this range. Only one (9.1%, 95% CI: 1.6-37.7%) patient had a subsequent level that fell just lower than the median. Conclusion  The trough and peak levels of apixaban in patients who have a high level on a single occasion, usually remain high when the assay is repeated in 2 months. Accordingly, the finding of a high apixaban level in patients deemed to be at high risk of bleeding, allows physicians contemplating off-label use of the 2.5-mg BID dose to limit its use to selected patients who are less likely to be exposed to an increased risk of thrombosis.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

单次测量阿哌沙班水平能否确定患者是否有过度暴露的风险?前瞻性队列研究。
背景房颤(AF)患者经常使用阿哌沙班2.5 mg,每日两次(BID)治疗,可能是为了降低出血风险。然而,这种方法有可能增加缺血性中风的风险。如果单次测量可以可靠地识别出高药物水平的患者,则可以通过限制对此类患者的超说明书剂量减少来减轻卒中风险的增加。本研究旨在确定单次高阿哌沙班水平是否预测2个月后重复测试时的类似高水平。方法在这项前瞻性队列研究中,临床患者接受阿哌沙班5mg BID治疗房颤或静脉血栓栓塞,在基线和2个月时使用STA-Liquid抗xa测定阿哌沙班的峰值和低谷水平。我们计算了保持在高五分位数水平的患者的比例。结果在100例入组患者中,82例进行了第二次访问,其中55例接受阿哌沙班5mg BID治疗。11例患者中有7例(63.6%,95%可信区间[CI]: 35.4-84.8%)和9例(81.8%,95% CI: 52.3-94.9%)的基线波谷和峰值水平分别位于上五分位数,其后续水平保持在该范围内。只有1例(9.1%,95% CI: 1.6-37.7%)患者的后续水平略低于中位数。结论阿哌沙班单次高水平患者的波谷和波峰水平通常在2个月后重复检测时仍保持较高水平。因此,在出血高风险患者中发现高阿哌沙班水平,允许医生考虑超说明书使用2.5 mg BID剂量,以限制其用于不太可能暴露于血栓形成风险增加的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信