Validation of the dosimetric and geometric accuracy of MR-only treatment planning solution for prostate cancer radiotherapy.

IF 1.3
Contemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland) Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-01-05 DOI:10.5114/wo.2021.112518
Michał Posiewnik, Tomasz Piotrowski
{"title":"Validation of the dosimetric and geometric accuracy of MR-only treatment planning solution for prostate cancer radiotherapy.","authors":"Michał Posiewnik,&nbsp;Tomasz Piotrowski","doi":"10.5114/wo.2021.112518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim was to validate the dosimetric and geometric accuracy of radiotherapy treatment plans for prostate cancer based on magnetic resonance (MR) imaging only and a solution based on computed tomography (CT) supported by MR imaging.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We used CT and MR images of ten prostate cancer patients implanted with three fiducial markers (FM) in the prostate gland. Rigid registration based on FM was performed to assess the fusion accuracy between MR and CT images. The differences between prostate contours (clinical target volume - CTV) on CT (CTV<sub>CT</sub>) and MR (CTV<sub>MR</sub>) images were scored using the Dice similarity coefficient and directly comparing the outlined volumes. The volumetric modulated arc therapy plans were designed and optimised on synthetic CT (sCT) to obtain the dose distribution for the MR-only solution. In the next step, the sCT images were replaced by conventional CT images and the plans were recalculated. The doses obtained on sCT and CT were compared by direct dose subtraction and the gamma method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The averaged fiducial registration error was equal to 0.5 mm. All CTV<sub>CT</sub> volumes were significantly bigger than corresponding CTV delineated on MR images (<i>p</i> = 0.005). The direct dose comparison shows that for 97.1% of patients' bodies, the differences were smaller than 0.1%. The average gamma passing rates were higher than 0.970.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MR imaging allows for a more precise delineation of the prostate compared to CT imaging. The workflow of plan preparation based on MR and CT is burdened with an FM registration error that is eliminated by an MR-only solution with no compromise on dose distribution.</p>","PeriodicalId":520599,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland)","volume":" ","pages":"249-253"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/3f/60/WO-25-46150.PMC8768054.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/wo.2021.112518","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: The aim was to validate the dosimetric and geometric accuracy of radiotherapy treatment plans for prostate cancer based on magnetic resonance (MR) imaging only and a solution based on computed tomography (CT) supported by MR imaging.

Material and methods: We used CT and MR images of ten prostate cancer patients implanted with three fiducial markers (FM) in the prostate gland. Rigid registration based on FM was performed to assess the fusion accuracy between MR and CT images. The differences between prostate contours (clinical target volume - CTV) on CT (CTVCT) and MR (CTVMR) images were scored using the Dice similarity coefficient and directly comparing the outlined volumes. The volumetric modulated arc therapy plans were designed and optimised on synthetic CT (sCT) to obtain the dose distribution for the MR-only solution. In the next step, the sCT images were replaced by conventional CT images and the plans were recalculated. The doses obtained on sCT and CT were compared by direct dose subtraction and the gamma method.

Results: The averaged fiducial registration error was equal to 0.5 mm. All CTVCT volumes were significantly bigger than corresponding CTV delineated on MR images (p = 0.005). The direct dose comparison shows that for 97.1% of patients' bodies, the differences were smaller than 0.1%. The average gamma passing rates were higher than 0.970.

Conclusions: MR imaging allows for a more precise delineation of the prostate compared to CT imaging. The workflow of plan preparation based on MR and CT is burdened with an FM registration error that is eliminated by an MR-only solution with no compromise on dose distribution.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

前列腺癌放疗仅磁共振治疗方案剂量学和几何精度的验证。
前言:目的是验证仅基于磁共振(MR)成像的前列腺癌放射治疗方案的剂量学和几何精度,以及基于磁共振成像支持的计算机断层扫描(CT)的解决方案。材料与方法:我们对10例前列腺癌患者的CT和MR图像进行了研究,并在前列腺中植入了3种基础标志物(FM)。采用基于FM的刚性配准来评估MR与CT图像的融合精度。使用Dice相似系数并直接比较轮廓体积,对CT (CTVCT)和MR (CTVMR)图像上前列腺轮廓(临床靶体积- CTV)的差异进行评分。在合成CT (sCT)上设计并优化了体积调制弧治疗方案,以获得仅mr溶液的剂量分布。下一步,将sCT图像替换为常规CT图像,并重新计算平面。用直接剂量减法和伽玛法比较sCT和CT上得到的剂量。结果:平均基准配准误差为0.5 mm。所有CTVCT体积均显著大于MR图像所描绘的相应CTV (p = 0.005)。直接剂量比较表明,97.1%的患者机体差异小于0.1%。平均伽马通过率大于0.970。结论:与CT成像相比,MR成像可以更精确地描绘前列腺。基于MR和CT的计划编制工作流程中存在FM配准误差,而仅使用MR解决方案可以在不影响剂量分布的情况下消除该误差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信