Employing the Urban Education Typology Through a Critical Race Spatial Analysis.

The Urban Review Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-11-05 DOI:10.1007/s11256-021-00625-y
John A Williams, Marlon James, Ana Carolina Díaz Beltrán, Jemimah Young, Mónica Vásquez Neshyba, Quinita Ogletree
{"title":"Employing the Urban Education Typology Through a Critical Race Spatial Analysis.","authors":"John A Williams,&nbsp;Marlon James,&nbsp;Ana Carolina Díaz Beltrán,&nbsp;Jemimah Young,&nbsp;Mónica Vásquez Neshyba,&nbsp;Quinita Ogletree","doi":"10.1007/s11256-021-00625-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The urban education typology put forth by Milner (Urban Educ 47(3):556-561, 2012) offered a conceptual demarcation of three different, yet interconnected types of urban school districts (i.e., urban intensive, urban emergent, and urban characteristic). Nearly one decade after Milner's seminal urban education typology, few empirical or conceptual articles have operationalized this typology across multiple school districts in one region. We enter this scholarly space to reaffirm the typology and its utility in identifying the conditions that create varying educational inequities and transformative opportunities. Through a critical race spatial analysis, we attempt to capture, crystalize, and expand Milner's typology by examining a multitude of data points and intentionally drawing on geospatial data from five linked school districts in Harris County, Texas. Our findings, as viewed through lenses of Critical Race Theory and the Chicana Feminist conceptual framework known as borderlands, accentuate two major implications; (1) while there are physical spaces of restriction inside and around schools and school districts, regularly school districts contend with identical challenges despite their urban education typology categorical classification; and (2) when employing the urban education typology, it is imperative that researchers deeply contextualize the physical, temporal, historical, social, and racialized spaces that schools and school districts exist in.</p>","PeriodicalId":515408,"journal":{"name":"The Urban Review","volume":"54 3","pages":"450-480"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8568565/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Urban Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-021-00625-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/11/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The urban education typology put forth by Milner (Urban Educ 47(3):556-561, 2012) offered a conceptual demarcation of three different, yet interconnected types of urban school districts (i.e., urban intensive, urban emergent, and urban characteristic). Nearly one decade after Milner's seminal urban education typology, few empirical or conceptual articles have operationalized this typology across multiple school districts in one region. We enter this scholarly space to reaffirm the typology and its utility in identifying the conditions that create varying educational inequities and transformative opportunities. Through a critical race spatial analysis, we attempt to capture, crystalize, and expand Milner's typology by examining a multitude of data points and intentionally drawing on geospatial data from five linked school districts in Harris County, Texas. Our findings, as viewed through lenses of Critical Race Theory and the Chicana Feminist conceptual framework known as borderlands, accentuate two major implications; (1) while there are physical spaces of restriction inside and around schools and school districts, regularly school districts contend with identical challenges despite their urban education typology categorical classification; and (2) when employing the urban education typology, it is imperative that researchers deeply contextualize the physical, temporal, historical, social, and racialized spaces that schools and school districts exist in.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

基于批判性种族空间分析的城市教育类型学应用。
米尔纳提出的城市教育类型学(urban Educ 47(3):556-561, 2012)对三种不同但相互关联的城市学区类型(即城市集约型、城市新兴型和城市特色型)进行了概念性划分。在米尔纳开创性的城市教育类型学提出近十年后,很少有经验性或概念性的文章将这种类型学应用于一个地区的多个学区。我们进入这个学术空间是为了重申类型学及其在识别产生不同教育不平等和变革机会的条件方面的效用。通过关键的种族空间分析,我们试图通过检查大量数据点,并有意利用德克萨斯州哈里斯县五个相连学区的地理空间数据,来捕捉、具体化和扩展米尔纳的类型学。我们的研究结果,通过批判性种族理论和被称为边境地带的墨西哥女权主义概念框架的镜头来看,强调了两个主要含义;(1)虽然学校和学区内部和周围存在物理空间限制,但学区通常面临相同的挑战,尽管它们具有城市教育类型和类别分类;(2)在运用城市教育类型学时,研究者必须对学校和学区所处的物理空间、时间空间、历史空间、社会空间和种族空间进行深入的语境化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信