Assessing a 6-h endpoint observation time in the lethality neutralization assay used to evaluate the preclinical efficacy of snake antivenoms

IF 3.6 Q2 TOXICOLOGY
Gina Durán, Gabriela Solano, Aarón Gómez, Daniel Cordero, Adriana Sánchez, Mauren Villalta, Melvin Sánchez, Cecilia Díaz, José María Gutiérrez, Guillermo León
{"title":"Assessing a 6-h endpoint observation time in the lethality neutralization assay used to evaluate the preclinical efficacy of snake antivenoms","authors":"Gina Durán,&nbsp;Gabriela Solano,&nbsp;Aarón Gómez,&nbsp;Daniel Cordero,&nbsp;Adriana Sánchez,&nbsp;Mauren Villalta,&nbsp;Melvin Sánchez,&nbsp;Cecilia Díaz,&nbsp;José María Gutiérrez,&nbsp;Guillermo León","doi":"10.1016/j.toxcx.2021.100087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The lethality neutralization assay in mice is the gold standard for the evaluation of the preclinical efficacy and specification fulfillment of snake antivenoms. However, owing to the animal suffering involved, this assay is a candidate to be replaced by <em>in vitro</em> alternatives or, at least, improved by the reduction of the number of animals used per experiment, the introduction of analgesia, and the refinement of the test. Since these tests are usually run for 24 or 48 h, one possibility to refine it is to shorten the endpoint observation time of the assay and so limiting the duration of suffering. To assess the effect of this modification of the standard procedure on the analytical properties of the assay, we compared the median lethal dose (LD<sub>50</sub>) and median effective dose (ED<sub>50</sub>) values, estimated through observation times of 6, 24 and 48 h. We used African and Latin American snake venoms and several batches of two polyspecific antivenoms. A significant correlation was found between LD<sub>50</sub> and ED<sub>50</sub> values estimated at the three observation times. Although some LD<sub>50</sub> and ED<sub>50</sub> values were significantly different at these time points, results of 6 h were robust enough to be used in the characterization of new antivenoms, the verification of specification compliance, and the parallel comparison of formulations. Our observations support the modification of the standard procedures used for assessing neutralizing ability of antivenoms by carrying out the observations at 6 h instead of 24 or 48 h, with the consequent reduction in the suffering inflicted upon mice during these assays. However, the shortening of the observation time in the lethality tests must be validated for each venom and antivenom before its introduction in the routine procedures.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37124,"journal":{"name":"Toxicon: X","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 100087"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8634039/pdf/","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxicon: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590171021000230","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The lethality neutralization assay in mice is the gold standard for the evaluation of the preclinical efficacy and specification fulfillment of snake antivenoms. However, owing to the animal suffering involved, this assay is a candidate to be replaced by in vitro alternatives or, at least, improved by the reduction of the number of animals used per experiment, the introduction of analgesia, and the refinement of the test. Since these tests are usually run for 24 or 48 h, one possibility to refine it is to shorten the endpoint observation time of the assay and so limiting the duration of suffering. To assess the effect of this modification of the standard procedure on the analytical properties of the assay, we compared the median lethal dose (LD50) and median effective dose (ED50) values, estimated through observation times of 6, 24 and 48 h. We used African and Latin American snake venoms and several batches of two polyspecific antivenoms. A significant correlation was found between LD50 and ED50 values estimated at the three observation times. Although some LD50 and ED50 values were significantly different at these time points, results of 6 h were robust enough to be used in the characterization of new antivenoms, the verification of specification compliance, and the parallel comparison of formulations. Our observations support the modification of the standard procedures used for assessing neutralizing ability of antivenoms by carrying out the observations at 6 h instead of 24 or 48 h, with the consequent reduction in the suffering inflicted upon mice during these assays. However, the shortening of the observation time in the lethality tests must be validated for each venom and antivenom before its introduction in the routine procedures.

Abstract Image

评估用于评估抗蛇毒血清临床前疗效的致死性中和试验的6小时终点观察时间
小鼠致死性中和试验是评价抗蛇毒血清临床前疗效和满足规格要求的金标准。然而,由于所涉及的动物的痛苦,该试验是被体外替代的候选方法,或者至少通过减少每次实验使用的动物数量、引入镇痛剂和改进试验来改进。由于这些测试通常运行24或48小时,一种改进的可能性是缩短试验的终点观察时间,从而限制痛苦的持续时间。为了评估标准程序的修改对分析性质的影响,我们比较了中位致死剂量(LD50)和中位有效剂量(ED50)值,通过观察时间分别为6、24和48小时。我们使用了非洲和拉丁美洲的蛇毒和几批两种多特异性抗蛇毒血清。在三次观测中,LD50和ED50值之间存在显著的相关性。尽管在这些时间点上,一些LD50和ED50值存在显著差异,但6小时的结果足够可靠,可用于新抗蛇毒血清的表征、规格符合性验证以及配方的平行比较。我们的观察结果支持对用于评估抗蛇毒血清中和能力的标准程序进行修改,通过在6小时而不是24或48小时进行观察,从而减少了在这些试验中对小鼠造成的痛苦。然而,在将每种蛇毒和抗蛇毒血清引入常规程序之前,必须对其进行验证,以缩短其在致命性试验中的观察时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Toxicon: X
Toxicon: X Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Toxicology
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信