Characteristics of Forces at the Clinician-Patient and Patient-Table Interfaces During Thoracic Spinal Manipulation in Asymptomatic Adults Are Consistent With Deformable Body Models.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Journal of Applied Biomechanics Pub Date : 2022-02-01 Epub Date: 2022-01-21 DOI:10.1123/jab.2021-0255
Joshua Thomas, Thomas Murphy, Steve Tran, Samuel J Howarth, David Starmer, Martha Funabashi
{"title":"Characteristics of Forces at the Clinician-Patient and Patient-Table Interfaces During Thoracic Spinal Manipulation in Asymptomatic Adults Are Consistent With Deformable Body Models.","authors":"Joshua Thomas,&nbsp;Thomas Murphy,&nbsp;Steve Tran,&nbsp;Samuel J Howarth,&nbsp;David Starmer,&nbsp;Martha Funabashi","doi":"10.1123/jab.2021-0255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Investigating all forces exerted on the patient's body during high-velocity, low-amplitude spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) remains fundamental to elucidate how these may contribute to SMT's effects. Previous conflicting findings preclude our understanding of the relationship between SMT forces acting at the clinician-patient and patient-table interfaces. This study aimed to quantify forces at the clinician-participant and participant-table interfaces during thoracic SMT in asymptnomatic adults. An experienced clinician provided a posterior to anterior SMT centered to T7 transverse processes using predetermined force-time characteristics to 40 asymptomatic volunteers (20 females; average age = 27.2 [4.9] y). Forces at the clinician-participant interface were recorded by triaxial load cells; whereas, forces at the participant-table interface were recorded by the force-sensing table technology. Preload force, total peak force, time to peak, and loading rate at each interface were analyzed descriptively. Total peak vertical forces at the clinician-participant interface averaged 532 (71) N while total peak forces at the participant-table interface averaged 658 (33) N. Forces at the participant-table interface were, on average, 1.27 (0.25) times larger than the ones at the clinician-participant interface. Larger forces at the participant-table interface compared with the ones at the clinician-participant interface during thoracic SMT are consistent with mathematical models developed to investigate thoracic impact simulating a dynamic force-deflection response.</p>","PeriodicalId":54883,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Biomechanics","volume":"38 1","pages":"39-46"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/jab.2021-0255","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Investigating all forces exerted on the patient's body during high-velocity, low-amplitude spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) remains fundamental to elucidate how these may contribute to SMT's effects. Previous conflicting findings preclude our understanding of the relationship between SMT forces acting at the clinician-patient and patient-table interfaces. This study aimed to quantify forces at the clinician-participant and participant-table interfaces during thoracic SMT in asymptnomatic adults. An experienced clinician provided a posterior to anterior SMT centered to T7 transverse processes using predetermined force-time characteristics to 40 asymptomatic volunteers (20 females; average age = 27.2 [4.9] y). Forces at the clinician-participant interface were recorded by triaxial load cells; whereas, forces at the participant-table interface were recorded by the force-sensing table technology. Preload force, total peak force, time to peak, and loading rate at each interface were analyzed descriptively. Total peak vertical forces at the clinician-participant interface averaged 532 (71) N while total peak forces at the participant-table interface averaged 658 (33) N. Forces at the participant-table interface were, on average, 1.27 (0.25) times larger than the ones at the clinician-participant interface. Larger forces at the participant-table interface compared with the ones at the clinician-participant interface during thoracic SMT are consistent with mathematical models developed to investigate thoracic impact simulating a dynamic force-deflection response.

无症状成人胸椎操作过程中临床-患者和患者-手术台界面的力特征与可变形体模型一致。
研究高速、低振幅脊柱操纵疗法(SMT)期间施加在患者身体上的所有力,对于阐明这些力如何促成SMT的效果仍然是至关重要的。先前相互矛盾的发现阻碍了我们对SMT力在临床-患者和患者-桌子界面之间关系的理解。本研究旨在量化无症状成人胸部SMT期间临床-参与者和参与者-桌子界面的作用力。一位经验丰富的临床医生利用预先确定的力-时间特征为40名无症状志愿者(20名女性;平均年龄= 27.2 [4.9]y)。临床-参与者界面的力由三轴称重传感器记录;而力感表技术则记录了参与者-表界面处的力。对各界面处的预紧力、总峰值力、到达峰值时间和加载速率进行了描述性分析。医生-参与者界面的垂直力峰值平均为532 (71)N,参与者-桌子界面的垂直力峰值平均为658 (33)N,参与者-桌子界面的垂直力峰值平均为医生-参与者界面的1.27(0.25)倍。在胸部SMT过程中,参与者-桌子界面上的力比临床医生-参与者界面上的力更大,这与为研究模拟动态力-挠度响应的胸部碰撞而建立的数学模型一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Biomechanics
Journal of Applied Biomechanics 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of the Journal of Applied Biomechanics (JAB) is to disseminate the highest quality peer-reviewed studies that utilize biomechanical strategies to advance the study of human movement. Areas of interest include clinical biomechanics, gait and posture mechanics, musculoskeletal and neuromuscular biomechanics, sport mechanics, and biomechanical modeling. Studies of sport performance that explicitly generalize to broader activities, contribute substantially to fundamental understanding of human motion, or are in a sport that enjoys wide participation, are welcome. Also within the scope of JAB are studies using biomechanical strategies to investigate the structure, control, function, and state (health and disease) of animals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信