Performance in the Glittre-ADL Test is Associated with the Pulmonary Function of Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Aline Almeida Gulart, Anelise Bauer Munari, Suelen Roberta Klein, Simone Graciosa Gavenda, Luiza Minato Sagrillo, Anamaria Fleig Mayer
{"title":"Performance in the Glittre-ADL Test is Associated with the Pulmonary Function of Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.","authors":"Aline Almeida Gulart,&nbsp;Anelise Bauer Munari,&nbsp;Suelen Roberta Klein,&nbsp;Simone Graciosa Gavenda,&nbsp;Luiza Minato Sagrillo,&nbsp;Anamaria Fleig Mayer","doi":"10.1080/15412555.2021.2008339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The relationship between lung function and performance in some functional tests, as the six-minute walk test (6MWT) and Glittre-ADL test (TGlittre) are still discrepant in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This study aimed to verify which test better correlates and is better explained by the pulmonary function, and which test better discriminates patients regarding the severity of the disease. Seventy-four patients with moderate to very severe COPD (54 men; 66 ± 9 years; FEV<sub>1</sub>: 37.2 ± 14.3%pred) were included. Spirometry, 6MWT and TGlittre were performed. The results showed weak to moderate correlation between pulmonary function variables and 6MWT (0.36 ≤ <i>r</i> ≤ 0.45) and TGlittre (-0.44 ≤ <i>r</i> ≤ -0.53). In patients with performance of ≤400 m in the 6MWT, a strong correlation was observed between TGlittre with FEV<sub>1</sub> (%pred) (<i>r</i> = -0.82; <i>p</i> < .001). The pulmonary function variable that better predict the functional tests performance was FEV<sub>1</sub> (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.17). Both functional tests were able to discriminate patients with COPD GOLD 4 from the other classifications. When compared to GOLD 2 patients, GOLD 4 patients presented higher time spent on TGlittre (<i>p</i> < .001). When compared to GOLD 3 patients, GOLD 4 patients had higher TGlittre (<i>p</i> = .001). No statistical differences were found in the 6MWT between GOLD 3 and 4, as well as between GOLD 2 and 3. In conclusion, the pulmonary function presents stronger correlations and better explain the variability of TGlittre than of the 6MWT, especially in patients with greater functional impairment. The TGlittre seems to better discriminate patients with COPD regarding the severity of lung function.</p>","PeriodicalId":10704,"journal":{"name":"COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","volume":"18 6","pages":"637-642"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15412555.2021.2008339","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/12/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The relationship between lung function and performance in some functional tests, as the six-minute walk test (6MWT) and Glittre-ADL test (TGlittre) are still discrepant in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This study aimed to verify which test better correlates and is better explained by the pulmonary function, and which test better discriminates patients regarding the severity of the disease. Seventy-four patients with moderate to very severe COPD (54 men; 66 ± 9 years; FEV1: 37.2 ± 14.3%pred) were included. Spirometry, 6MWT and TGlittre were performed. The results showed weak to moderate correlation between pulmonary function variables and 6MWT (0.36 ≤ r ≤ 0.45) and TGlittre (-0.44 ≤ r ≤ -0.53). In patients with performance of ≤400 m in the 6MWT, a strong correlation was observed between TGlittre with FEV1 (%pred) (r = -0.82; p < .001). The pulmonary function variable that better predict the functional tests performance was FEV1 (R2 = 0.17). Both functional tests were able to discriminate patients with COPD GOLD 4 from the other classifications. When compared to GOLD 2 patients, GOLD 4 patients presented higher time spent on TGlittre (p < .001). When compared to GOLD 3 patients, GOLD 4 patients had higher TGlittre (p = .001). No statistical differences were found in the 6MWT between GOLD 3 and 4, as well as between GOLD 2 and 3. In conclusion, the pulmonary function presents stronger correlations and better explain the variability of TGlittre than of the 6MWT, especially in patients with greater functional impairment. The TGlittre seems to better discriminate patients with COPD regarding the severity of lung function.

慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的Glittre-ADL测试表现与肺功能相关
慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的肺功能与表现之间的关系在一些功能测试中仍然存在差异,如6分钟步行测试(6MWT)和glitre - adl测试(TGlittre)。本研究旨在验证哪项测试与肺功能的相关性更好,并能更好地解释肺功能,以及哪项测试能更好地区分患者的疾病严重程度。74例中度至极重度COPD患者(男性54例;66±9岁;FEV1: 37.2±14.3%pred)。肺量测定、6MWT和TGlittre检测。结果显示肺功能变量与6MWT(0.36≤r≤0.45)和TGlittre(-0.44≤r≤-0.53)呈弱至中度相关性。在6MWT中表现≤400 m的患者中,TGlittre与FEV1 (%pred)之间存在很强的相关性(r = -0.82;p < 1 (R2 = 0.17)。两种功能测试都能够将COPD GOLD 4患者与其他分类区分开来。与GOLD 2患者相比,GOLD 4患者使用TGlittre的时间更长(p p = .001)。GOLD 3和GOLD 4以及GOLD 2和GOLD 3之间的6MWT均无统计学差异。综上所述,与6MWT相比,TGlittre与肺功能的相关性更强,更能解释TGlittre的变异性,尤其是在功能损害较大的患者中。TGlittre似乎能更好地区分COPD患者肺功能的严重程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: From pathophysiology and cell biology to pharmacology and psychosocial impact, COPD: Journal Of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease publishes a wide range of original research, reviews, case studies, and conference proceedings to promote advances in the pathophysiology, diagnosis, management, and control of lung and airway disease and inflammation - providing a unique forum for the discussion, design, and evaluation of more efficient and effective strategies in patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信