Links between Child Shyness and Indices of Internalizing Problems during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Protective Role of Positivity.

IF 1.7 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY
Journal of Genetic Psychology Pub Date : 2022-03-01 Epub Date: 2021-12-03 DOI:10.1080/00221325.2021.2011093
Stefania Sette, Antonio Zuffianò, Belén López-Pérez, Jane McCagh, Gian Vittorio Caprara, Robert J Coplan
{"title":"Links between Child Shyness and Indices of Internalizing Problems during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Protective Role of Positivity.","authors":"Stefania Sette,&nbsp;Antonio Zuffianò,&nbsp;Belén López-Pérez,&nbsp;Jane McCagh,&nbsp;Gian Vittorio Caprara,&nbsp;Robert J Coplan","doi":"10.1080/00221325.2021.2011093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Shyness in childhood has been linked to socio-emotional difficulties such as anxiety, depression, and loneliness. On the contrary, positivity (i.e., a personal tendency to see oneself, life, and future in a positive light) has been described as a protective factor. Given the challenges experienced by children during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic (e.g., closure of school and confinement), we aimed to test the potential protective role of positivity and how it may link child shyness and indices of internalizing problems (i.e., anxiety, depression, loneliness) during the first wave of the pandemic. Participants were <i>N</i> = 236 children (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 9.25 years, <i>SD</i> = 1.20) from Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom, the three worst-hit countries in Europe when the data were collected (April-June, 2020). Children completed online self-evaluation scales to assess temperamental shyness, positivity, and indices of internalizing problems during the COVID-19 pandemic. Results from a multivariate regression analysis revealed significant interaction effects between shyness and positivity in the prediction of outcome variables. Follow-up simple slope analyses indicated that shyness was positively related to depression only among children with lower levels of positivity. The study highlights the role of children's positivity in buffering the pernicious link between shyness and their negative feelings during the pandemic. The practical implications of these findings are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":54827,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Genetic Psychology","volume":"183 2","pages":"91-106"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Genetic Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00221325.2021.2011093","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/12/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Shyness in childhood has been linked to socio-emotional difficulties such as anxiety, depression, and loneliness. On the contrary, positivity (i.e., a personal tendency to see oneself, life, and future in a positive light) has been described as a protective factor. Given the challenges experienced by children during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic (e.g., closure of school and confinement), we aimed to test the potential protective role of positivity and how it may link child shyness and indices of internalizing problems (i.e., anxiety, depression, loneliness) during the first wave of the pandemic. Participants were N = 236 children (Mage = 9.25 years, SD = 1.20) from Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom, the three worst-hit countries in Europe when the data were collected (April-June, 2020). Children completed online self-evaluation scales to assess temperamental shyness, positivity, and indices of internalizing problems during the COVID-19 pandemic. Results from a multivariate regression analysis revealed significant interaction effects between shyness and positivity in the prediction of outcome variables. Follow-up simple slope analyses indicated that shyness was positively related to depression only among children with lower levels of positivity. The study highlights the role of children's positivity in buffering the pernicious link between shyness and their negative feelings during the pandemic. The practical implications of these findings are discussed.

COVID-19大流行期间儿童害羞与内化问题指数之间的联系:积极性的保护作用
童年时期的害羞与焦虑、抑郁和孤独等社会情感问题有关。相反,积极(即从积极的角度看待自己、生活和未来的个人倾向)被描述为一种保护因素。鉴于儿童在第一波COVID-19大流行期间所经历的挑战(例如,关闭学校和禁闭),我们旨在测试积极性的潜在保护作用,以及它如何将儿童害羞与第一波大流行期间的内化问题指数(即焦虑、抑郁、孤独)联系起来。参与者是来自意大利、西班牙和英国的N = 236名儿童(年龄= 9.25岁,SD = 1.20),这是收集数据时(2020年4月至6月)欧洲受灾最严重的三个国家。儿童完成在线自我评估量表,评估新冠肺炎大流行期间的气质羞怯、积极性和内化问题指标。多元回归分析结果显示,羞怯和积极在预测结果变量方面具有显著的交互作用。后续简单斜率分析表明,只有在积极程度较低的儿童中,羞怯与抑郁呈正相关。该研究强调了儿童的积极性在缓解大流行期间害羞和负面情绪之间的有害联系方面的作用。讨论了这些发现的实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Genetic Psychology is devoted to research and theory in the field of developmental psychology. It encompasses a life-span approach, so in addition to manuscripts devoted to infancy, childhood, and adolescence, articles on adulthood and aging are also published. We accept submissions in the area of educational psychology as long as they are developmental in nature. Submissions in cross cultural psychology are accepted, but they must add to our understanding of human development in a comparative global context. Applied, descriptive, and qualitative articles are occasionally accepted, as are replications and refinements submitted as brief reports. The review process for all submissions to The Journal of Genetic Psychology consists of double blind review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信