Microbiological and Antimicrobial Pattern of Diabetic Foot Ulcers at a Tertiary Care Center in East China.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Yaping Xie, Ying Xu, Kuang Chen, Can Chen, Jiao Huang, Qiong Chen, Pengfei Shi
{"title":"Microbiological and Antimicrobial Pattern of Diabetic Foot Ulcers at a Tertiary Care Center in East China.","authors":"Yaping Xie, Ying Xu, Kuang Chen, Can Chen, Jiao Huang, Qiong Chen, Pengfei Shi","doi":"10.1177/15347346211055972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diabetic foot infections (DFIs) are the most complex and challenging pathological state, characterized by high complexity of management, morbidity, and mortality. Empirical antimicrobial administration is needed before the identification of the causative organisms. Microbiological profile of the diabetic foot patients is the basis of the antibiotic choice for clinicians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>76 patients visiting the Diabetic Foot Center of our Hospital for having ulcers with Wagner 3 to 5 were retrospectively surveyed for the bacterium infected. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) was implemented and the results were interpreted on the basis of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 92 isolates were obtained, of which 47 strains of gram-negative bacilli (GNB) accounted for 51.1%, 41 strains of gram-positive cocci (GPC) accounted for 44.6%, and 4 strains of fungi accounted for 4.3%. Species of <i>Enterobacteriaceae</i> and <i>Staphylococcus</i> are the two predominant strains. The top 4 most frequently isolated strains were <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (22.8%), <i>enterococcus faecalis</i> (9.8%), <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> (9.8%), <i>Escherichia coli</i> (5.4%). The rate of resistance to methicillin was 33.3% for <i>S. aureus</i>. The rate of extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) production among <i>E. coli</i> was 60%. 50% of <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i> were resistant to carbapenems. <i>P. aeruginosa</i> showed high sensitivity to commonly used antibiotics. There was one isolate of <i>Acinetobacter</i> spp. resistant to most antimicrobials except tigecycline and aminoglycosides.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong><i>Enterobacteriaceae</i> and <i>Staphylococcus</i> are the two predominant species. The resistance to antibiotics of <i>S. aureus and P. aeruginosa</i> showed optimistic results. However, the high prevalence of CRKP imposed a challenging issue for clinical physicians.</p>","PeriodicalId":49181,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds","volume":" ","pages":"104-108"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15347346211055972","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/11/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Diabetic foot infections (DFIs) are the most complex and challenging pathological state, characterized by high complexity of management, morbidity, and mortality. Empirical antimicrobial administration is needed before the identification of the causative organisms. Microbiological profile of the diabetic foot patients is the basis of the antibiotic choice for clinicians.

Methods: 76 patients visiting the Diabetic Foot Center of our Hospital for having ulcers with Wagner 3 to 5 were retrospectively surveyed for the bacterium infected. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) was implemented and the results were interpreted on the basis of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines.

Results: A total of 92 isolates were obtained, of which 47 strains of gram-negative bacilli (GNB) accounted for 51.1%, 41 strains of gram-positive cocci (GPC) accounted for 44.6%, and 4 strains of fungi accounted for 4.3%. Species of Enterobacteriaceae and Staphylococcus are the two predominant strains. The top 4 most frequently isolated strains were Staphylococcus aureus (22.8%), enterococcus faecalis (9.8%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (9.8%), Escherichia coli (5.4%). The rate of resistance to methicillin was 33.3% for S. aureus. The rate of extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) production among E. coli was 60%. 50% of Klebsiella pneumoniae were resistant to carbapenems. P. aeruginosa showed high sensitivity to commonly used antibiotics. There was one isolate of Acinetobacter spp. resistant to most antimicrobials except tigecycline and aminoglycosides.

Conclusion: Enterobacteriaceae and Staphylococcus are the two predominant species. The resistance to antibiotics of S. aureus and P. aeruginosa showed optimistic results. However, the high prevalence of CRKP imposed a challenging issue for clinical physicians.

华东某三级医疗中心糖尿病足溃疡的微生物和抗菌模式
背景:糖尿病足感染(DFIs)是最复杂、最具挑战性的病理状态,其特点是管理复杂、发病率高、死亡率高。在确定致病菌之前,需要进行经验性抗菌治疗。糖尿病足患者的微生物学特征是临床医生选择抗生素的依据。方法:对本院糖尿病足中心就诊的 76 名溃疡为 Wagner 3 至 5 级的患者进行回顾性调查,以确定感染的细菌。结果:共获得 92 个分离菌株:结果:共分离出 92 株细菌,其中 47 株革兰阴性杆菌(GNB)占 51.1%,41 株革兰阳性球菌(GPC)占 44.6%,4 株真菌占 4.3%。肠杆菌科和葡萄球菌是最主要的两种菌株。最常分离到的前 4 种菌株是金黄色葡萄球菌(22.8%)、粪肠球菌(9.8%)、铜绿假单胞菌(9.8%)和大肠埃希菌(5.4%)。金黄色葡萄球菌对甲氧西林的耐药率为 33.3%。大肠埃希菌产生广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBLs)的比例为 60%。50%的肺炎克雷伯菌对碳青霉烯类产生耐药性。铜绿假单胞菌对常用抗生素表现出高度敏感性。除了替加环素和氨基糖苷类药物外,有一株分离出的不动杆菌对大多数抗菌药具有耐药性:结论:肠杆菌科和葡萄球菌是两种主要的细菌。金黄色葡萄球菌和铜绿假单胞菌对抗生素的耐药性结果令人乐观。然而,CRKP 的高流行率给临床医生带来了挑战性问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
17.60%
发文量
95
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds (IJLEW) is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, reviews of evidence-based diagnostic techniques and methods, disease and patient management, and surgical and medical therapeutics for lower extremity wounds such as burns, stomas, ulcers, fistulas, and traumatic wounds. IJLEW also offers evaluations of assessment and monitoring tools, dressings, gels, cleansers, pressure management, footwear/orthotics, casting, and bioengineered skin. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信