Diagnostic importance of serum C-reactive protein and procalcitonin in sepsis after burn.

IF 1.4 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
International Journal of Burns and Trauma Pub Date : 2021-10-15 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01
Ebral Yiğit, Yasemin Demir Yiğit
{"title":"Diagnostic importance of serum C-reactive protein and procalcitonin in sepsis after burn.","authors":"Ebral Yiğit,&nbsp;Yasemin Demir Yiğit","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In this study, we investigated the usefulness of blood white blood cell (WBC), C-reactive protein (CRP) and Procalcitonin (PCT) levels with a clinical diagnosis of infection in patients with severe burns, with a bacterial culture (+) wound site, in patients with SIRS and sepsis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In the study, 23 patients with (+) burn wound culture hospitalized in the intensive care unit of Gazi Yaşargil Training and Research Hospital Burn Center burn between January 2016 and January 2021 were analyzed. While five of these patients were showing symptoms of SIRS. Sepsis was observed in five patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 23 patients, 18 (78.3%) were male, and 5 (21.7%) were female. The majority of our patients were lived in rural areas. The average age of patients was 1,061±17,273 years. The wound culture results of the 23 patients were (+), mostly due to <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> in 21.7% (n=5) and <i>Staphylococcus epidermidis</i> in 21.7% (n=5). PCT and CRP results did not statistically differ in patients with sepsis, SIRS and (+) wound culture.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The laboratory biomarkers WBC, CRP and PCT do not have a superior value in determining and monitoring infection processes in patients with serious burns.</p>","PeriodicalId":45488,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Burns and Trauma","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8610824/pdf/ijbt0011-0391.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Burns and Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In this study, we investigated the usefulness of blood white blood cell (WBC), C-reactive protein (CRP) and Procalcitonin (PCT) levels with a clinical diagnosis of infection in patients with severe burns, with a bacterial culture (+) wound site, in patients with SIRS and sepsis.

Materials and methods: In the study, 23 patients with (+) burn wound culture hospitalized in the intensive care unit of Gazi Yaşargil Training and Research Hospital Burn Center burn between January 2016 and January 2021 were analyzed. While five of these patients were showing symptoms of SIRS. Sepsis was observed in five patients.

Results: From 23 patients, 18 (78.3%) were male, and 5 (21.7%) were female. The majority of our patients were lived in rural areas. The average age of patients was 1,061±17,273 years. The wound culture results of the 23 patients were (+), mostly due to Staphylococcus aureus in 21.7% (n=5) and Staphylococcus epidermidis in 21.7% (n=5). PCT and CRP results did not statistically differ in patients with sepsis, SIRS and (+) wound culture.

Conclusion: The laboratory biomarkers WBC, CRP and PCT do not have a superior value in determining and monitoring infection processes in patients with serious burns.

Abstract Image

血清c反应蛋白和降钙素原对烧伤后脓毒症的诊断意义。
在这项研究中,我们研究了血液白细胞(WBC)、c反应蛋白(CRP)和降钙素原(PCT)水平在严重烧伤患者感染的临床诊断中的作用,伴有细菌培养(+)伤口部位,SIRS和脓毒症患者。材料与方法:本研究对2016年1月至2021年1月在Gazi yaargil训练与研究医院烧伤中心重症监护室住院的23例(+)烧伤创面培养患者进行分析。其中5名患者表现出SIRS的症状。5例患者出现脓毒症。结果:23例患者中,男性18例(78.3%),女性5例(21.7%)。我们的大多数病人生活在农村地区。患者平均年龄1061±17273岁。23例患者伤口培养结果为(+),主要为金黄色葡萄球菌(21.7%)(n=5)和表皮葡萄球菌(21.7%)(n=5)。脓毒症、SIRS和(+)伤口培养患者的PCT和CRP结果无统计学差异。结论:实验室生物标志物WBC、CRP和PCT在判断和监测严重烧伤患者感染过程中没有优越的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
12.50%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信