Cost of healthy and culturally acceptable diets in Brazil in 2009 and 2018.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Revista de saude publica Pub Date : 2021-11-26 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.11606/s1518-8787.2021055003329
Eliseu Verly Junior, Dayan Carvalho Ramos Salles de Oliveira, Rosely Sichieri
{"title":"Cost of healthy and culturally acceptable diets in Brazil in 2009 and 2018.","authors":"Eliseu Verly Junior, Dayan Carvalho Ramos Salles de Oliveira, Rosely Sichieri","doi":"10.11606/s1518-8787.2021055003329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To estimate the lowest cost of a healthy and culturally acceptable diet and to assess the evolution of its cost in the periods 2008-2009 and 2017-2018.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used data on the individual food consumption and food prices from the Pesquisas de Orçamentos Familiares (Household Budget Surveys), in the 2008-2009 and 2017-2018. The sample strata of each period were aggregated, forming 108 new strata with geographic and economic homogeneity. Linear programming models generated diets for each new stratum, considering the constraints in two models: model 1 (≥ 400g of fruits and vegetables); and model 2 (≥ 400g of fruits and vegetables, < 2300mg of sodium, sodium/potassium ratio < 1, ≥ 500mg of calcium). Each food could progressively deviate 5g from the observed consumption averages until the models found a solution in each of the strata. The objective function was to minimize the total cost of the diet.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average observed and optimized costs were R$4.96, R$4.62 (model 1) and R$5.08 (model 2) in 2008-2009, and R$9.18, R$8.69 and R$9.87 in 2017-2018. Models 1 and 2 resulted in an increase of up to 6% and 11% in 2008-2009, and of up to 25% and 34% in 2017-2018 in the lowest income strata. The main changes observed in the two models include the reduction in the amounts of sweetened beverages, sweets, sauces, ready-to-eat foods, and an increase in fruits and vegetables, flour, and tubers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The adequate amount of fruits and vegetables resulted in an increase in costs to some population strata. When the adequacy of calcium, sodium, and potassium was considered, we observed a more significant increase in cost, especially in 2017-2018.</p>","PeriodicalId":21230,"journal":{"name":"Revista de saude publica","volume":"55 suppl 1","pages":"7s"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8627151/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de saude publica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2021055003329","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To estimate the lowest cost of a healthy and culturally acceptable diet and to assess the evolution of its cost in the periods 2008-2009 and 2017-2018.

Methods: We used data on the individual food consumption and food prices from the Pesquisas de Orçamentos Familiares (Household Budget Surveys), in the 2008-2009 and 2017-2018. The sample strata of each period were aggregated, forming 108 new strata with geographic and economic homogeneity. Linear programming models generated diets for each new stratum, considering the constraints in two models: model 1 (≥ 400g of fruits and vegetables); and model 2 (≥ 400g of fruits and vegetables, < 2300mg of sodium, sodium/potassium ratio < 1, ≥ 500mg of calcium). Each food could progressively deviate 5g from the observed consumption averages until the models found a solution in each of the strata. The objective function was to minimize the total cost of the diet.

Results: The average observed and optimized costs were R$4.96, R$4.62 (model 1) and R$5.08 (model 2) in 2008-2009, and R$9.18, R$8.69 and R$9.87 in 2017-2018. Models 1 and 2 resulted in an increase of up to 6% and 11% in 2008-2009, and of up to 25% and 34% in 2017-2018 in the lowest income strata. The main changes observed in the two models include the reduction in the amounts of sweetened beverages, sweets, sauces, ready-to-eat foods, and an increase in fruits and vegetables, flour, and tubers.

Conclusion: The adequate amount of fruits and vegetables resulted in an increase in costs to some population strata. When the adequacy of calcium, sodium, and potassium was considered, we observed a more significant increase in cost, especially in 2017-2018.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

2009 年和 2018 年巴西健康和文化上可接受的饮食成本。
目的估算健康且文化上可接受的饮食的最低成本,并评估 2008-2009 年和 2017-2018 年期间其成本的变化情况:我们使用了 2008-2009 年和 2017-2018 年家庭预算调查(Pesquisas de Orçamentos Familiares)中关于个人食品消费和食品价格的数据。对每个时期的样本分层进行了汇总,形成了 108 个具有地理和经济同质性的新分层。线性规划模型为每个新分层生成膳食,并考虑两个模型中的约束条件:模型 1(水果和蔬菜≥400 克);模型 2(水果和蔬菜≥400 克,钠< 2300 毫克,钠/钾比率< 1,钙≥500 毫克)。每种食物可逐渐偏离观察到的平均消耗量 5 克,直到模型在每个分层中找到一个解决方案。目标函数是使饮食的总成本最小化:2008-2009年的平均观察成本和优化成本分别为4.96雷亚尔、4.62雷亚尔(模型1)和5.08雷亚尔(模型2),2017-2018年的平均观察成本和优化成本分别为9.18雷亚尔、8.69雷亚尔和9.87雷亚尔。模型 1 和模型 2 的结果是,2008-2009 年最低收入阶层的收入分别增加了 6% 和 11%,2017-2018 年分别增加了 25% 和 34%。在这两个模型中观察到的主要变化包括:甜饮料、糖果、调味品、即食食品的数量减少,水果和蔬菜、面粉和块茎类食物的数量增加:结论:适量的水果和蔬菜会导致某些人群的成本增加。当考虑到钙、钠和钾的充足性时,我们发现成本增加更为显著,尤其是在 2017-2018 年。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista de saude publica
Revista de saude publica PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.60%
发文量
93
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Revista de Saúde Pública has the purpose of publishing original scientific contributions on topics of relevance to public health in general.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信