Frailty and In-Hospital Mortality Risk Using EHR Nursing Data.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Biological research for nursing Pub Date : 2022-04-01 Epub Date: 2021-12-30 DOI:10.1177/10998004211060541
Deborah Lekan, Thomas P McCoy, Marjorie Jenkins, Somya Mohanty, Prashanti Manda
{"title":"Frailty and In-Hospital Mortality Risk Using EHR Nursing Data.","authors":"Deborah Lekan,&nbsp;Thomas P McCoy,&nbsp;Marjorie Jenkins,&nbsp;Somya Mohanty,&nbsp;Prashanti Manda","doi":"10.1177/10998004211060541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PurposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate four definitions of a Frailty Risk Score (FRS) derived from EHR data that includes combinations of biopsychosocial risk factors using nursing flowsheet data or International Classification of Disease, 10th revision (ICD-10) codes and blood biomarkers and its predictive properties for in-hospital mortality in adults ≥50 years admitted to medical-surgical units. <b>Methods</b> In this retrospective observational study and secondary analysis of an EHR dataset, survival analysis and Cox regression models were performed with sociodemographic and clinical covariates. Integrated area under the ROC curve (iAUC) across follow-up time based on Cox modeling was estimated. <b>Results</b> The 46,645 patients averaged 1.5 hospitalizations (SD = 1.1) over the study period and 63.3% were emergent admissions. The average age was 70.4 years (SD = 11.4), 55.3% were female, 73.0% were non-Hispanic White (73.0%), mean comorbidity score was 3.9 (SD = 2.9), 80.5% were taking 1.5 high risk medications, and 42% recorded polypharmacy. The best performing FRS-NF-26-LABS included nursing flowsheet data and blood biomarkers (Adj. HR = 1.30, 95% CI [1.28, 1.33]), with good accuracy (iAUC = .794); the reduced model with age, sex, and FRS only demonstrated similar accuracy. The poorest performance was the ICD-10 code-based FRS. <b>Conclusion</b> The FRS captures information about the patient that increases risk for in-hospital mortality not accounted for by other factors. Identification of frailty enables providers to enhance various aspects of care, including increased monitoring, applying more intensive, individualized resources, and initiating more informed discussions about treatments and discharge planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":8997,"journal":{"name":"Biological research for nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological research for nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10998004211060541","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/12/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate four definitions of a Frailty Risk Score (FRS) derived from EHR data that includes combinations of biopsychosocial risk factors using nursing flowsheet data or International Classification of Disease, 10th revision (ICD-10) codes and blood biomarkers and its predictive properties for in-hospital mortality in adults ≥50 years admitted to medical-surgical units. Methods In this retrospective observational study and secondary analysis of an EHR dataset, survival analysis and Cox regression models were performed with sociodemographic and clinical covariates. Integrated area under the ROC curve (iAUC) across follow-up time based on Cox modeling was estimated. Results The 46,645 patients averaged 1.5 hospitalizations (SD = 1.1) over the study period and 63.3% were emergent admissions. The average age was 70.4 years (SD = 11.4), 55.3% were female, 73.0% were non-Hispanic White (73.0%), mean comorbidity score was 3.9 (SD = 2.9), 80.5% were taking 1.5 high risk medications, and 42% recorded polypharmacy. The best performing FRS-NF-26-LABS included nursing flowsheet data and blood biomarkers (Adj. HR = 1.30, 95% CI [1.28, 1.33]), with good accuracy (iAUC = .794); the reduced model with age, sex, and FRS only demonstrated similar accuracy. The poorest performance was the ICD-10 code-based FRS. Conclusion The FRS captures information about the patient that increases risk for in-hospital mortality not accounted for by other factors. Identification of frailty enables providers to enhance various aspects of care, including increased monitoring, applying more intensive, individualized resources, and initiating more informed discussions about treatments and discharge planning.

使用电子病历护理数据的虚弱和住院死亡率风险。
目的本研究的目的是评估虚弱风险评分(FRS)的四种定义,这些定义来自EHR数据,包括使用护理流程数据或国际疾病分类第10版(ICD-10)代码的生物心理社会风险因素组合和血液生物标志物,以及FRS对内科-外科住院≥50岁成人住院死亡率的预测特性。方法回顾性观察性研究并对EHR数据集进行二次分析,采用社会人口学和临床协变量进行生存分析和Cox回归模型。基于Cox模型估计随访时间的ROC曲线下综合面积(iAUC)。结果46,645例患者在研究期间平均住院1.5次(SD = 1.1),其中63.3%为急诊入院。平均年龄70.4岁(SD = 11.4),女性占55.3%,非西班牙裔白人占73.0%(73.0%),平均合并症评分为3.9分(SD = 2.9), 80.5%的患者服用1.5种高危药物,42%的患者有多药记录。表现最好的FRS-NF-26-LABS包括护理流程数据和血液生物标志物(HR = 1.30, 95% CI[1.28, 1.33]),准确度较好(iAUC = .794);年龄、性别和FRS的简化模型仅显示出类似的准确性。基于ICD-10编码的FRS表现最差。结论FRS捕获了增加住院死亡风险的患者信息,但没有考虑到其他因素。对虚弱的识别使提供者能够加强护理的各个方面,包括加强监测,应用更密集、更个性化的资源,并就治疗和出院计划发起更知情的讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Biological Research For Nursing (BRN) is a peer-reviewed quarterly journal that helps nurse researchers, educators, and practitioners integrate information from many basic disciplines; biology, physiology, chemistry, health policy, business, engineering, education, communication and the social sciences into nursing research, theory and clinical practice. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信