Psychometric properties and correlates of Chinese version of Perceived Stress Scale (CPSS-10) in people with common mental disorders with different employment Statuses.

Sam Shih, Ashley Chan, Eva Yeung, Amily Tsang, Rose Chiu, Menza Chu, Magdalene Poon
{"title":"Psychometric properties and correlates of Chinese version of Perceived Stress Scale (CPSS-10) in people with common mental disorders with different employment Statuses.","authors":"Sam Shih,&nbsp;Ashley Chan,&nbsp;Eva Yeung,&nbsp;Amily Tsang,&nbsp;Rose Chiu,&nbsp;Menza Chu,&nbsp;Magdalene Poon","doi":"10.1177/15691861211032318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Several studies have indicated that stress is associated with common mental disorders, and work stress trebles the risk of developing them. However, a validated assessment tool for measuring and establishing psychological stress correlates in this group of clients remains unavailable. The objectives of the present study were to examine the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Scale-10 (CPSS-10) on people with common mental disorders with different employment statuses and explore its correlates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two hundred and fifty-two participants with common mental disorders were recruited. The data were analysed through exploratory factor and confirmatory analyses to investigate construct validity. The convergent and discriminant validities were examined based on their correlation with other measures, while the internal consistency was estimated using Cronbach's α coefficient. A t-test was used to detect differences between groups. The CPSS-10 correlates were explored using multiple linear regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Principal component analysis with varimax rotation yielded two factors, which accounted for 63.82% of the total variance, while confirmatory factor analysis confirmed its factor structure. The CPSS-10 had a positively moderate to strong correlation with other measures, thereby indicating its acceptable convergent and discriminant validities. The internal consistency ranged from acceptable to good for the two subscales and ten overall items, while the item-total correlation was adequate except for the seventh item. There were no group differences in gender nor employment status. Finally, the CPSS-10 predictors were studied.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The CPSS-10 is a reliable and valid instrument for people with common mental disorders with different employment statuses.</p>","PeriodicalId":73249,"journal":{"name":"Hong Kong journal of occupational therapy : HKJOT","volume":"34 2","pages":"103-112"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/15691861211032318","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hong Kong journal of occupational therapy : HKJOT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15691861211032318","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/8/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background/objectives: Several studies have indicated that stress is associated with common mental disorders, and work stress trebles the risk of developing them. However, a validated assessment tool for measuring and establishing psychological stress correlates in this group of clients remains unavailable. The objectives of the present study were to examine the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Scale-10 (CPSS-10) on people with common mental disorders with different employment statuses and explore its correlates.

Methods: Two hundred and fifty-two participants with common mental disorders were recruited. The data were analysed through exploratory factor and confirmatory analyses to investigate construct validity. The convergent and discriminant validities were examined based on their correlation with other measures, while the internal consistency was estimated using Cronbach's α coefficient. A t-test was used to detect differences between groups. The CPSS-10 correlates were explored using multiple linear regression analysis.

Results: Principal component analysis with varimax rotation yielded two factors, which accounted for 63.82% of the total variance, while confirmatory factor analysis confirmed its factor structure. The CPSS-10 had a positively moderate to strong correlation with other measures, thereby indicating its acceptable convergent and discriminant validities. The internal consistency ranged from acceptable to good for the two subscales and ten overall items, while the item-total correlation was adequate except for the seventh item. There were no group differences in gender nor employment status. Finally, the CPSS-10 predictors were studied.

Conclusion: The CPSS-10 is a reliable and valid instrument for people with common mental disorders with different employment statuses.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

中文版压力感知量表(CPSS-10)在不同就业状态的常见精神障碍患者中的心理测量特征及相关因素
背景/目的:几项研究表明,压力与常见的精神障碍有关,工作压力使患这些疾病的风险增加了两倍。然而,一个有效的评估工具,测量和建立心理压力相关的这组客户仍然不可用。摘要本研究的目的是考察中国版压力知觉量表(CPSS-10)对不同就业状况的常见精神障碍患者的心理测量特征及其相关关系。方法:招募了252名患有常见精神障碍的参与者。通过探索性因素分析和验证性分析对数据进行分析,以考察结构效度。根据其与其他测量的相关性检验其收敛效度和判别效度,并使用Cronbach's α系数估计其内部一致性。采用t检验检测组间差异。采用多元线性回归分析探讨CPSS-10的相关因素。结果:方差旋转主成分分析得到2个因子,占总方差的63.82%,验证性因子分析证实了其因子结构。CPSS-10量表与其他量表具有正中至强的相关性,表明其具有可接受的收敛效度和判别效度。两个子量表和十个总体项目的内部一致性范围从可接受到良好,而项目-总相关性是充分的,除了第七个项目。在性别和就业状况方面没有群体差异。最后,研究了CPSS-10的预测因子。结论:CPSS-10量表适用于不同就业状况的常见精神障碍患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信