Development of a Standardized Semantic Feature-Based Reporting Proforma for Intraoperative Ultrasound Findings in Brain Tumors and Application in High-Grade Gliomas - A Preliminary Study.

IF 1.3 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Ultrasound International Open Pub Date : 2021-11-17 eCollection Date: 2021-08-01 DOI:10.1055/a-1637-9550
Prakash Shetty, Vikas Kumar Singh, Amit Choudhari, Aliasgar V Moiyadi
{"title":"Development of a Standardized Semantic Feature-Based Reporting Proforma for Intraoperative Ultrasound Findings in Brain Tumors and Application in High-Grade Gliomas - A Preliminary Study.","authors":"Prakash Shetty,&nbsp;Vikas Kumar Singh,&nbsp;Amit Choudhari,&nbsp;Aliasgar V Moiyadi","doi":"10.1055/a-1637-9550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose</b> A semantic feature-based reporting proforma for intraoperative ultrasound findings in brain tumors was devised to standardize reporting. It was applied as a pilot study on a cohort of histologically confirmed high-grade supratentorial gliomas (Grade 3 and 4) for internal validation. <b>Materials and Methods</b> This intraoperative semantic ultrasound proforma was used to evaluate 3D ultrasound volumes using Radiant DICOM software by 3 surgeons. The ultrasound semantic features were correlated with histological features like tumor grade, IDH status, and MIB index. <b>Results</b> 68 patients were analyzed using the semantic proforma. Irregular crenated was the most common margin (63.2%) and lesions were heterogeneously hyperechoic (95.6%). Necrosis was commonly seen and noted as single (67.6%) or multiple (13.2%) in over 80% cases. A separate perilesional zone, which was predominantly hyperechoic in 41.8% and both hypo and hyperechoic in 12.7%, could be identified in 54.5% of cases. Grade 4 tumors were more likely to have an irregular crenated margin (71.2%) with a single large area of necrosis, while Grade 3 tumors were likely to have smooth (31.3%) or non-characterizable margins (31.2%) with no or multiple areas of necrosis. IDH-negative tumors were more likely to have a single large focus of necrosis. Among the GBMs (52 cases), MIB labelling index of>15% was associated with poorly delineated, uncharacterizable margins, when compared with MIB labelling index<15% (23.5 vs. 0%), (p=0.046). <b>Conclusion</b> A detailed semantic proforma was developed for brain tumors and was internally validated. A few ultrasound sematic features were identified correlating with histological features in high-grade gliomas. It will require further external validation for refinement and acceptability.</p>","PeriodicalId":44852,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound International Open","volume":"7 2","pages":"E55-E63"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8598392/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound International Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1637-9550","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose A semantic feature-based reporting proforma for intraoperative ultrasound findings in brain tumors was devised to standardize reporting. It was applied as a pilot study on a cohort of histologically confirmed high-grade supratentorial gliomas (Grade 3 and 4) for internal validation. Materials and Methods This intraoperative semantic ultrasound proforma was used to evaluate 3D ultrasound volumes using Radiant DICOM software by 3 surgeons. The ultrasound semantic features were correlated with histological features like tumor grade, IDH status, and MIB index. Results 68 patients were analyzed using the semantic proforma. Irregular crenated was the most common margin (63.2%) and lesions were heterogeneously hyperechoic (95.6%). Necrosis was commonly seen and noted as single (67.6%) or multiple (13.2%) in over 80% cases. A separate perilesional zone, which was predominantly hyperechoic in 41.8% and both hypo and hyperechoic in 12.7%, could be identified in 54.5% of cases. Grade 4 tumors were more likely to have an irregular crenated margin (71.2%) with a single large area of necrosis, while Grade 3 tumors were likely to have smooth (31.3%) or non-characterizable margins (31.2%) with no or multiple areas of necrosis. IDH-negative tumors were more likely to have a single large focus of necrosis. Among the GBMs (52 cases), MIB labelling index of>15% was associated with poorly delineated, uncharacterizable margins, when compared with MIB labelling index<15% (23.5 vs. 0%), (p=0.046). Conclusion A detailed semantic proforma was developed for brain tumors and was internally validated. A few ultrasound sematic features were identified correlating with histological features in high-grade gliomas. It will require further external validation for refinement and acceptability.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

基于标准化语义特征的脑肿瘤术中超声结果报告格式的开发及其在高级别胶质瘤中的应用——初步研究。
目的设计一种基于语义特征的脑肿瘤术中超声结果报告格式,以规范报告。它被应用于一组组织学证实的高级别幕上胶质瘤(3级和4级)的初步研究,以进行内部验证。材料与方法3位外科医生采用术中语义超声形式,利用Radiant DICOM软件对三维超声体积进行评估。超声语义特征与肿瘤分级、IDH状态、MIB指数等组织学特征相关。结果对68例患者进行语义形式分析。不规则圆齿是最常见的边缘(63.2%),病变呈异质高回声(95.6%)。坏死常见于单发(67.6%)或多发(13.2%),占80%以上。在54.5%的病例中可以发现一个单独的病灶周围区,41.8%的病例以高回声为主,12.7%的病例低回声和高回声并存。4级肿瘤更可能有不规则的圆齿状边缘(71.2%),伴有单个大面积坏死,而3级肿瘤可能有光滑的边缘(31.3%)或非特征性的边缘(31.2%),没有或多个坏死区域。idh阴性肿瘤更可能有单个大病灶坏死。与MIB标记指数相比,在52例GBMs中,>15%的MIB标记指数与描述不佳、无法表征的边缘相关。结论:为脑肿瘤开发了详细的语义形式,并进行了内部验证。在高级别胶质瘤中发现了一些与组织学特征相关的超声语义特征。它将需要进一步的外部验证以进行细化和可接受性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ultrasound International Open
Ultrasound International Open RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信