Clinical Pharmacist's Intervention to Improve Medication Titration for Heart Failure: First Experience from Sudan.

IF 2.1 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Integrated Pharmacy Research and Practice Pub Date : 2021-11-11 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.2147/IPRP.S341621
Kannan O Ahmed, Imad Taj Eldin, Mirghani Yousif, Ahmed A Albarraq, Bashir A Yousef, Nasrein Ahmed, Anas Babiker
{"title":"Clinical Pharmacist's Intervention to Improve Medication Titration for Heart Failure: First Experience from Sudan.","authors":"Kannan O Ahmed,&nbsp;Imad Taj Eldin,&nbsp;Mirghani Yousif,&nbsp;Ahmed A Albarraq,&nbsp;Bashir A Yousef,&nbsp;Nasrein Ahmed,&nbsp;Anas Babiker","doi":"10.2147/IPRP.S341621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medications known to improve outcomes in heart failure (HF) are either not prescribed or prescribed at sub-therapeutic doses. The addition of clinical pharmacists to the HF team positively impacts optimizing prognostic medications for a patient with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the intervention of the clinical pharmacist as part of the multidisciplinary (MD) team in up-titration to achieve target doses of key therapeutic agents for HFrEF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective one group pretest-posttest interventional study; a comparison of the target dose achievement of key therapeutic agents for HFrEF was performed before and after clinical pharmacist interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 110 HFrEF patients, 57.3% were males, and the mean age of patients was 55.8 years (SD 12.6). Cardiomyopathy was the leading cause of HF. At baseline, 86% were on angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers/angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ACEIs/ARBs/ARNi) and 93.6% on beta blockers (BBs). At the end of study, the proportion of patients achieved the target dose was significantly increased (0 vs 77.4%, 6.8 vs 85.4%, and 0 vs 55.6%) for ACEIs, ARBs and ARNi, respectively, and (8.6% vs 66.1%; P = 0.001) for BBs. Moreover, the up-titration process was associated with significant improvement in most clinical as ejection fraction and New York Heart Association (NYHA) scale and laboratory characteristics.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>As a part of the MD team in the outpatient HF clinic, the clinical pharmacists increased the percentage of HFrEF patients achieving the target or maximal doses of key therapeutic agents and improving clinical and laboratory parameters.</p>","PeriodicalId":45655,"journal":{"name":"Integrated Pharmacy Research and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d8/31/iprp-10-135.PMC8593340.pdf","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrated Pharmacy Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/IPRP.S341621","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background: Medications known to improve outcomes in heart failure (HF) are either not prescribed or prescribed at sub-therapeutic doses. The addition of clinical pharmacists to the HF team positively impacts optimizing prognostic medications for a patient with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).

Objective: To assess the intervention of the clinical pharmacist as part of the multidisciplinary (MD) team in up-titration to achieve target doses of key therapeutic agents for HFrEF.

Methods: This was a prospective one group pretest-posttest interventional study; a comparison of the target dose achievement of key therapeutic agents for HFrEF was performed before and after clinical pharmacist interventions.

Results: Out of 110 HFrEF patients, 57.3% were males, and the mean age of patients was 55.8 years (SD 12.6). Cardiomyopathy was the leading cause of HF. At baseline, 86% were on angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers/angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ACEIs/ARBs/ARNi) and 93.6% on beta blockers (BBs). At the end of study, the proportion of patients achieved the target dose was significantly increased (0 vs 77.4%, 6.8 vs 85.4%, and 0 vs 55.6%) for ACEIs, ARBs and ARNi, respectively, and (8.6% vs 66.1%; P = 0.001) for BBs. Moreover, the up-titration process was associated with significant improvement in most clinical as ejection fraction and New York Heart Association (NYHA) scale and laboratory characteristics.

Conclusion: As a part of the MD team in the outpatient HF clinic, the clinical pharmacists increased the percentage of HFrEF patients achieving the target or maximal doses of key therapeutic agents and improving clinical and laboratory parameters.

临床药师干预改善心力衰竭药物滴度:苏丹首例经验。
背景:已知可改善心力衰竭(HF)预后的药物要么未开处方,要么以亚治疗剂量开处方。临床药师加入心衰团队对优化射血分数降低(HFrEF)心衰患者的预后药物有积极影响。目的:评价临床药师作为多学科(MD)团队的一员,对HFrEF关键治疗剂的上滴量达到目标剂量的干预作用。方法:前瞻性一组前测后测介入研究;比较临床药师干预前后HFrEF主要治疗药物的目标剂量实现情况。结果:110例HFrEF患者中,男性占57.3%,平均年龄55.8岁(SD 12.6)。心肌病是心衰的主要原因。基线时,86%的患者服用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂/血管紧张素受体阻滞剂/血管紧张素受体-neprilysin抑制剂(ACEIs/ARBs/ARNi), 93.6%的患者服用β受体阻滞剂(BBs)。研究结束时,acei、arb和ARNi达到目标剂量的患者比例分别显著增加(0比77.4%,6.8比85.4%,0比55.6%),(8.6%比66.1%;P = 0.001)。此外,升滴过程与大多数临床射血分数、纽约心脏协会(NYHA)量表和实验室特征的显著改善有关。结论:临床药师作为HF门诊MD团队的一员,提高了HFrEF患者达到关键治疗剂目标或最大剂量的比例,改善了临床和实验室参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
3.40%
发文量
29
审稿时长
16 weeks
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信